Skip to main content
Log in

The Long and Winding Road of Molecular Data in Phylogenetic Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of molecules and reactions as evidence, markers and/or traits for evolutionary processes has a history more than a century long. Molecules have been used in studies of intra-specific variation and studies of similarity among species that do not necessarily result in the analysis of phylogenetic relations. Promoters of the use of molecular data have sustained the need for quantification as the main argument to make use of them. Moreover, quantification has allowed intensive statistical analysis, as a condition and a product of increasing automation. All of these analyses are subject to the methodological anxiety characteristic of a community in search of objectivity (Suárez-Díaz and Anaya-Muñoz, Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 39:451–458, 2008). It is in this context that scientists compared and evaluated protein and nucleic acid sequence data with other types of molecular data – including immunological, electrophoretic and hybridization data. This paper argues that by looking at long-term historical processes, such as the use of molecular evidence in evolutionary biology, we gain valuable insights into the history of science. In that sense, it accompanies a growing concern among historians for big-pictures of science that incorporate the fruitful historical research on local cases of the last decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anfinsen, Christian B. 1959. “The Molecular Basis of Evolution”. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, Jay D. 2002. “‘Molecules and Monkeys’: George Gaylord Simpson and the Challenge of Molecular Evolution.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 441–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise, John C. 1974. “Systematic Value of Electrophoretic Data.” Systematic Zoology, 23: 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise, John C. 2004. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution, 2nd Edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, John. 1990. “Evolutionary Anti-Reductionism: Historical Reflections.” Biology and Philosophy 5: 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, William C. 1963. “Genetics and the Human Race.” Science 140: 1057–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten, Roy J., and Davidson, Eric H. 1969. “Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory.” Science 165(3891):349–357

  • Britten, Roy J., and Kohne, David. 1968. “Repeated Sequences in DNA.” Science 161(3841): 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner-Janusch, John. 1962. “Biochemical Genetics of the Primates Hemoglobins and Transferrins.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102: 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Adrianne. 2002. “GenBank turns 20.” http://www.genomeweb.com/genbank-turns-20

  • Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi, L., Edwards, and Scott, V. 1967. “Phylogenetic Analysis: Models and Estimation Procedures.” Evolution 21(3): 550–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceruzzi, P.E. 1998. A History of Modern Computing, 2nd Edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Chiang, Howard H.H. 2009. “The Laboratory Technology of Discrete Molecular Separation: The Historical Development of Gel Electrophoresis and the Material Epistemology of Biomolecular Science, 1945–1970.” Journal of the History of Biology 42(3): 495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, Joel L. 1987. M.R. Hecht, B. Wallace, and G.T. Prance (eds.), DNA Hybridization and Avian Phylogenetics. New York: Plenum, pp. 47–96.

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff, Margaret O. 1969. “Computer Analysis of Protein Evolution.” Scientific American 221: 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff, Margaret O., Eck, Richard V., Chang, Marie A., and Sochard, Minie R. 1965. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. Silver Spring: National Biomedical Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff, Margaret O., Schwartz, R.M., and Orcutt, B.C. 1978. “A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins.” M.O. Dayhoff and R.M. Schwartz (eds.), Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol. 5. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp. 345–352.

  • De Chadarevian, Soraya. 1998. S. de Chadarevian and H. Kamminga (eds.), Following Molecules: Hemoglobin Between the Clinic and the Laboratory. Amsterdam: Harwood, pp. 171–201.

  • De Chadarevian, Soraya. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • De Chadarevian, Soarya, and Kammimga, Harmke (eds.). 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine. New Practices and Alliances 19101970s. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers.

  • Dickerman, A.W. 1991. “Among-Run Artifacts in DNA Hybridization.” Systematic Zoology 40(4): 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 1994. “The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 27(1): 21–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Michael R. 1998. “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution Within Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W. Ford. 1999. “Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree.” Science 284(5423): 212–2124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W. Ford. 2005. “If the Tree of Life Fell, Would It Make a Sound?” J. Sapp (ed.), Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution. Concepts and Controversies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–133.

  • Doty, Paul, Julius, Marmur, Eigner, J., and Schilkdraut, C. 1960. “Strand Separation and Specific Recombination in Deoxyribonucleic Acids: Physical Chemical Studies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 46(4): 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edman, Pehr, and Begg, Geoffrey. 1967. “A Protein Sequenator.” European Journal of Biochemistry 1: 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World. Computers and Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, Joseph. 1987. “Estimation of Hominoid Phylogeny from a DNA Hybridization Data Set.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 3: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, Joseph. 2001. “The Troubled Growth of Statistical Phylogenetics.” Systematic Biology 50(4): 465–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, D.F., Johnson, M.S., and Doolittle, R.F. 1985. “Aligning Amino Acid Sequences: Comparison of Commonly Used Methods.” Journal of Molecular Biology 21: 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, Walter M. 1966. “The Relation Between Frequencies of Amino Acids and Ordered Trinucleotides.” Journal of Molecular Biology 16: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, Walter M. 2000. “Homology, a Personal View on Some of the Problems.” Trends in Genetics 16(5): 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, Walter M., and Margoliash, Emanuel. 1967. “Construction of Phylogenetic Trees.” Science 155(3760): 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, Walter M., and Margoliash, Emanuel. 1968. “The Construction of Phylogenetic Trees. II. How Well Do They Reflect Past History?” Brookhaven Symposium of Biology 21: 217.

  • Florkin, Marcel. 1949. Biochemical Evolution. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannett, Lisa, and Griesemer, James. 2004. “Classical Genetics and the Geography of Genes.” H.J. Rheinberger and J.P. Gaudilliere (eds.), The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Deister, Vivette. 2011. “The Old Man and the Sea Urchin Genome: Theory and Data in the work of Eric Davidson (1969–2006). History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 33: 147–164

  • Garcia-Deister, Vivette. 2013. Interruptores, Baterias y Redes. El manejo de complejidad en la regulación genética. México City: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano

  • García-Sancho, Miguel. 2009. “The Perception of an Information Society and the Emergence of the First Computerized Biological Databases.” A. Matsumoto and M. Nakano (eds.), Human Genome. Features, Variations and Genetic Disorders. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Sancho, Miguel. 2010. “A New Insight into Sanger’s Development of Sequencing: From Proteins to DANN, 1943–1977.” Journal of the History of Biology 43(2): 263–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Sancho, Miguel. 2011. “From Metaphor to Practices: The Introduction of Information Engineers into the First DNA Sequence Database.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33(1): 71–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Sancho, Miguel. 2012. Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing. From Proteins to DANN, 19452000. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Giacomoni, Dario. 1993. “The Origin of DNA:RNA Hybridization.” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogarten, Johann, Doolittle, Ford, and Lawrence, J.G. 2002. “Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(12): 2226–2238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Morris. 1960. “On the Emergence of Intraspecific Differences in the Protein Antigens of Human Beings.” The American Naturalist 94(875): 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Morris. 1962. “Immunochemistry of the Primates and Primate Evolution.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102: 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Morris. 1964. “Man’s Place in the Phylogeny of the Primates as Reflected in Serum Proteins.” S.L. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Limited, pp. 204–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Morris. 1996. “Epilogue: A Personal Account of the Origins of a New Paradigm.” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5(1): 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 1985. “A Clock of Evolution.” Natural History 85(4): 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel. 1999. “Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel. 2001. “The Introduction of Computers into Systematic Research in the United States During the 1960s.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel. 2003. “The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology from Quantitative Zoology to Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 353–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Joel. 2010. “Waiting for Sequences: Morris Goodman, Immunodiffusion Experiments, and the Origins of Molecular Anthropology.” Journal of the History of Biology 43(4): 697–725.

  • Harris, Harry. 1966. “Enzyme Polymorphisms in Man.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 164(995): 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirs, C.H.W., Moore, S., and Stein, W.H. (1960). “The Sequence of the Amino Acid Residues in Performic Acid-Oxidized Ribonuclease”. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 235: 633–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirszfeld, Ludwik, and Hirszfeld, Hanna. 1919. “Serological Differences Between Blood of Different Races.” Lancet 2: 675–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, N.H. 1965. “The Evolution of Biochemical Synthesis-Retrospect and Prospect.” V. Bryson and H.J. Vogel (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York: Academic Press, pp. 15–24.

  • Houde, P. 1987. “Critical Evaluation of DNA Hybridization Studies in Avian Systematics.” The Auk 104: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubby, John L., and Lewontin, Richard C. 1966. “A Molecular Approach to the Study of Genic Heterozygosity in Natural Populations I. The Number of Alleles at Different Loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 54: 577–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Vernon M. 1956. “A Specific Chemical Difference Between Globins of Normal and Sickle-Cell Anemia Hemoglobins.” Nature 178: 792–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukes, Thomas H. 1966. “Molecules and Evolution”. New York: Columbia University Press

  • Jukes, Thomas H., and Cantor, Charles R. 1969. “Evolution of Protein Molecules.” H.N. Munro (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 21–132.

  • Kay, Lily. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Jane, Heeney, Catherine, Hawkins, Naomi, Hawkins, de Vries, Jantina, and Boddington, Paula. 2009. “Data Sharing in Genomics – Re-shaping Scientific Practice.” Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Peter, Limoges, Camille, and Cambrosio, Alberto. 1999. “The Automated Laboratory.” Fortun Michael and Mendelsohn Everett (eds.), The Practices of Human Genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 125–142.

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ronald R. 2006. “Cybernetics, Management Science, and Technology Policy: The Emergence of ‘Information Technology’ as a Keyword, 1948–1985.” Technology and Culture 47: 513–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, Timothy. 1999. “Shaping Biomedicine as an Information Science.” M.E. Bowden, T.B. Hahn, and R.V. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems. ASIS Monographic Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., pp. 27–45.

  • Lewontin, Richard C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindee, Susan and Santos Ventura Ricardo. 2012. “The Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles and International Networks: An Introduction to Supplement 5”. Current Anthropology, 53(5S): 3–16

  • Lipphardt, Veronika. 2010. “The Jewish Community of Rome: An Isolated Population? Bio-historical narratives in Genetic Analysis in the 1950s”. Biosocieties, 5(3): 306–329

  • Lipphardt, Veronika. 2012. “Isolates and Crosses in Human Population Genetics or: A Contextualization of German Race Science”. Current Anthropology, 53 (5): 69–82

  • Lovejoy, C.O., Burstein, A.H., Herple, K.G. “Primate Phylogeny and Immunological Distance”. Science, 176(4036): 803–805

  • Margoliash, Emanuel. 1963. “Primary Structure and Evolution of Cytochrome C.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 50(4): 672–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Jonathan. 1996. “The Legacy of Serological Studies in American Physical Anthropology.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18: 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Jonathan. 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Apes, People and Their Genes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Marks, Jonathan. 2008. “Myths of Molecular Anthropology.” Unpublished Paper for the Making Sequence Matter Conference, Yale University, June 20–21, 2008.

  • Marks, Jonathan, Schmid, Carl W., and Sarich, Vincent M. 1988. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide to Phylogeny: Relations of the Hominidae.” Journal of Human Evolution 18: 165–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmur, Julius, and Doty, Paul. 1959. “Heterogeneity in Deoxyribonucleic Acids: I. Dependence on Composition of the Configuration Stability of DNA’s.” Nature 183: 1427–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, P.M.H. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics an Human Failings. The Eugenic Society and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 1995. Species and Specificity. An Interpretation of the History of Immunology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Gregory J. 1998. “Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965.” Journal of the History of Biology 31: 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, T., and Vingron, Martin. 2000. “Modeling Amino Acid Replacement.” Journal of Computational Biology 7(6): 761–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, S., and Wunsch, Christian. 1970. “A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of Two Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3): 443–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • November, Joseph. 2006. “Digitalizing Life: The Introduction of Computers to Biology and Medicine.” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Princeton University.

  • November, Joseph. 2012. Biomedical Computing. Digitalizing Life in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, George H.F. 1904. Blood Immunity and Blood Relationship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • O’Hara, Richard. 1991. “Review of “Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution” by Charles Sibley and Jon Ahlquist.” The Auk 108(4): 990–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, Maureen A., and Boucher, Y. 2005. “Paradigm Change in Evolutionary Microbiology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstone, John. 1993. “Ways of Knowing. Towards a Historical Sociology of Science, Technology and Medicine.” British Journal for the History of Science 26: 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T.M. 1992. “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science.” Social Studies of Science 22(4): 633–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in Numbers, The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R. 1994. “Molecular Techniques in Population Genetics: A Brief History.” B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G.P. Wagner, and R. De Salle (eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution. Approaches and Applications. Bazel: Verlag Birkhauser; pp. 131–156.

  • Rieppel, O., and Kearney, M. 2007. “The Poverty of Taxonomic Characters.” Biology and Philosophy 22(1): 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, Lewin. 1988. “DNA Clock Conflict Continues.” Science 241: 1756–1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo, Maryellen, and Smith, T.F. 1986. “Phylogeny and DNA–DNA Hybridization.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan (ed.). 2005. Microbial Phylogeny and Evolution. Concepts and Controversies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, Vincent, Schmid, Carl W., and Jonathan, Marks. 1988. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide to Phylogeny: A Critical Analysis.” Cladistics 5: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, Vincent M., and Wilson, Alan C. 1967. “Immunological Time-Scale for Hominoid Evolution.” Science 158: 1200–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, James A. 1993. “Introduction”. The British Journal for the History of Science, 26: 387–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Carl W., and Marks, Jonathan. 1990. “DNA Hybridization as a Guide into Phylogeny: Physical and Chemical Limits.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1984. “The Phylogeny of the Hominoid Primates, as Indicated by DNA–DNA Hybridization.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1987. “DNA Hybridization Evidence of a Hominoid Phylogeny; Evidence from an Expanded Data Set.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 26: 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, Charles G., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, Charles G., Comstock, John A., and Ahlquist, Jon E. 1990. “DNA Hybridization Evidence of Hominoid Phylogeny: A Reanalysis of the Data.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 202–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. 1964. “The Meaning of Taxonomic Statements.” SL Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Temple F. 1990. “The History of the Genetic Sequence Databases.” Genomics 6: 701–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Marianne. 2008. “History in the Gene: Negotiations Between Molecular and Organismal Anthropology.” Journal of the History of Biology 41(3): 473–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Marianne. 2012. “Human Evolution Across the Disciplines: Spotlights on American Anthropology and genetics”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 34: 211–236

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 1999. “Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease.” Science 286(5444): 1488–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2006. “Collecting and Experimenting: The Moral Economies of Biological Research, 1960–1980s.” H.J. Rheinberger and S. de Chadarevian (eds.), History and Epistemology of Molecular Biology and Beyond: Problems and Perspectives. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Preprint 310, pp. 105–123.

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2008. GenBank. Natural History in the 21st Century? Science 322: 537–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2010a. “Laboratories, Museums, and the Comparative Perspective: Alan A. Boyden’s Quest for Objectivity in Serological taxonomy, 1924–1962.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40(2): 149–182.

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2010b. “Collecting, Comparing, and Computing Sequences: The Making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s “Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure”, 1954–1965.” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 623–660.

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2011. “The Experimenter’s Museum: Genbank, Natural History and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine.” Isis 102(1): 60–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, E. 2001. “Satellite-DNA: A Case Study for the Evolution of Experimental Techniques.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(1): 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Díaz, Edna. 2007. “The Rhetoric of Informational Molecules. Authority and Promises in the Early Days of Molecular Evolution.” Science in Context 20(4): 649–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Díaz, Edna. 2010. “Making Room for New Faces. Evolution, Genomics and the Growth of Bioinformatics.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32: 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, Edna, and Barahona, Ana. 1996. “The Experimental Roots of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18: 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Díaz, Edna, and Anaya-Muñoz, Victor. 2008. “History, Objectivity and the Construction of Molecular Phylogenies.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R. 1988. “The Phylogeny of the Hominoid Primates: A Statistical Analysis of the DNA–DNA Hybridization Data.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 2: 428–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1994. Naturalist. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.C., and Sarich, V.M. 1969. “A Molecular Time – Scale for Human Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 63: 1088–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, M.M. 1980. Blood Pure and Simple. A Story of Discovery, of People and of Ideas. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.

  • Zuckerkandl, Emilé. 1964. “Perspectives in Molecular Anthropology.” S.L. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution. London: Methuen and Co. Limited, pp. 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, Emilé, Jones, Richard T., and Pauling, Linus. 1960. “A Comparison of Animal Hemoglobins by Tryptic Peptide Pattern Analysis.” PNAS 46: 1349–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, Emilé, and Pauling, Linus. 1962. “Molecular Disease, Evolution and Genic Heterogeneity.” M. Kasha and B. Pullman (eds.), Horizons in Biochemistry: Albert Szent-Györyi Dedicatory Volume. New York: Academic Press, pp. 189–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl, Emile, Pauling, Linus. 1965a. “Molecules as Documents of Evolutionary History.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 8: 357–366.

  • Zuckerkandl, Emilé, Pauling, Linus. 1965b. “Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins.” Vernon Bryson, Henry Vogel (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York:Academic Press, pp. 97–166.

  • Zuckerkandl, Emilé, and Schroeder, Walter A. 1961. “Amino-Acid Composition of the Polypeptide Chains of Gorilla Hemoglobin”. Nature 192: 984–985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edna Suárez-Díaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suárez-Díaz, E. The Long and Winding Road of Molecular Data in Phylogenetic Analysis. J Hist Biol 47, 443–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9373-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9373-9

Keywords

Navigation