Abstract
Starting from the works by Aselli (De lactibus sive lacteis venis, 1627) on the milky veins and Harvey (1628, translated in 1993) on the motion of the heart and the circulation of the blood, the practice of vivisection witnessed a resurgence in the early modern period. I discuss some of the most notable cases in the century spanning from Aselli’s work to the investigations of fluid pressure in plants and animals by Stephen Hales (Vegetable Staticks, 1727). Key figures in my study include Johannes Walaeus, Jean Pecquet, Marcello Malpighi, Reinier de Graaf, Richard Lower, Anton Nuck, and Anton de Heide. Although vivisection dates from antiquity, early modern experimenters expanded the range of practices and epistemic motivations associated with it, displaying considerable technical skills and methodological awareness about the problems associated with the animals being alive and the issue of generalizing results to humans. Many practitioners expressed great discomfort at the suffering of the animals; however, many remained convinced that their investigations were not only indispensable from an epistemic standpoint but also had potential medical applications. Early modern vivisection experiments were both extensive and sophisticated and cannot be ignored in the literature of early modern experimentation or of experimentation on living organisms across time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aselli, Gasparo. 1627. De lactibus sive lacteis venis. Milan: apud Io. Baptistam Bidellium.
Bartholin, Thomas. 1663–1667. Epistolarum medicinalium centuria I–IV. 3 vols. Copenhagen: Typis Matthiæ Godicchenii, impensis Petri Haubold.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2008. “The Collaboration Between Anatomists and Mathematicians in the Mid-Seventeenth Century.” Early Science and Medicine 13: 665–709.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2011a. Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), The Color of Blood: Between Sensory Experience and Epistemic Significance, pp. 117–134.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2011b. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2011c. “Reliability and Generalization in Early Modern Anatomy.” In Maria Teresa Monti (ed.), La Tradizione galileiana e lo sperimentalismo naturalistico d’età moderna. Florence: Olschki, pp. 1–26.
Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Galileo’s Instruments of Credit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso. 1680–1681. De motu animalium. 2 vols. Rome: Angeli Bernabò.
Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1982. “Boyle and Harvey on the Valves in the Veins.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 56: 351–367.
Bylebyl, Jerome J. 1985. Andrew Wear, Roger K. French, and Iain M. Lonie (eds.), “Disputation and Description in the Renaissance Pulse Controversy”, pp. 223–245.
Carlino, Andrea. 1999. Books of the Body. Anatomical Ritual and Renaissance Learning. Translated by John and Anne C. Tedeschi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, Francis J. 1917–1921. “The History of Anatomical Injections.” C. Singer (ed.), Studies in the History and Method of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Vol. 2, pp. 285–343.
Colombo, Realdo. 1559. De re anatomica libri XV. Venice: Nicolaus Bevilacqua.
Cook, Harold J. 2007. Matters of Exchange Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cunningham, Andrew. 1985. Andrew Wear, Roger K. French, and Iain M. Lonie (eds.), Fabricius and the ‘Aristotle Project’ in Anatomical Teaching and Research at Padua, pp. 195–222.
Cunningham, Andrew. 1996. “The Historical Work of Wharton’s Work on Glands.” Thomas Wharton (ed.), Adenographia, XXVII–LII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cunningham, Andrew. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Daston, Lorraine and Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.). 2011. Histories of Scientific Observations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Heide, Anton. 1684. Anatome mytuli. Amsterdam: apud Janssonio Waesbergios
de Moulin, Daniel. 1988. A History of Surgery with Emphasis on the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience. The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eales, Nellie B. 1974. “The History of the Lymphatic System, with Special Reference to the Hunter-Monro Controversy.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 29: 280–294.
Ekholm, Karin J. 2010. Generation and its Problems: Harvey, Highmore and Their Contemporaries. Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Eriksson, Ruben. 1959. Andreas Vesalius’ First Public Anatomy at Bologna. 1540. An Eyewitness Report by Baldasar Heseler. Uppsala and Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Fabrizi, Gerolamo. 1600. De formato foetu. Venice: Per Franciscum Bolzettam.
Fournier, Marian. 1996. The Fabric of Life. Microscopy in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Frank, Robert G. Jr. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists. Berkeley: University of California Press.
French, Roger K. 1985. Andrew Wear, Roger K. French, and Iain M. Lonie (eds.), Berengario da Carpi and the Use of Commentary in Anatomical Teaching, pp. 42–74.
French, Roger K. 1994. William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
French, Roger K. 1999. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Gassendi, Pierre. 1641. Viri illustris Nicolai Claudii de Peireesc, senatoris aqvisextiensis vita. Paris: Sebastian Cramoisy.
Guerrini, Anita. 1989. “The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50: 391–407.
Guerrini, Anita. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Guerrini, Anita. 2006. “Alexander Monro Primus and the Moral Theatre of Anatomy.” The Eighteenth Century 47: 1–18.
Hales, Stephen. 1733. Statical Essays: Containing Hæmastaticks. London: W. Innis and R. Manby.
Hales, Stephen. 1969. Vegetable Staticks. London: Macdonald; New York: American Elsevier (originally published London: W. and J. Innys, and T. Woodward, 1727).
Harvey, William. 1993. The Circulation of the Blood and Other Writings. Translation by Kenneth J. Franklin with introduction by Andrew Wear. London: Everyman.
Holmes, Frederic L. 1993. “The Old Martyr of Science: The Frog in Experimental Physiology.” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 311–328.
Kooijmans, Luuc Webb. 2010. Death Defied: The Anatomy Lessons of Frederik Ruysch. Boston, MA: Brill.
Lawrence, Christopher. 1987. Rupke (ed.), Cinema Vérité?: The Image of William Harvey’s Experiments in 1928, pp. 295–313.
Le Clerc, Daniel, and Manget, Jean-Jacques (eds.). 1699. Bibliotheca anatomica. 2 Vols. 2nd ed., Geneva: Johan. Anthon. Chouët & David Ritter.
Lindeboom, Gerrit A. 1975. “Dog and Frog: Physiological Experiments at Leiden during the Seventeenth Century.” Scheurleer Lunsingh, H. Theodoor, Meyjes Posthumus, and H.M. Guillame (eds.), Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century. Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 279–294.
Lindeboom, Gerrit A. 1984. Dutch Medical Biography. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lower, Richard. 1669. Tractatus de corde. London: James Allestry.
Maehle, Andreas-Holger. 1987. Johann Jakob Wepfer (1620–1695) als Toxikologe. Aarau: Sauerländer.
Maehle, Andreas-Holger. 1990. “Literary Responses to Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Britain.” Medical History 34: 27–51.
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, and Trohler, Ulrich. 1987. Rupke (ed.), Animal Experimentation from Antiquity to the End of the Eighteenth Century: Attitudes and Arguments, pp. 14–47.
Manzoni, Tullio, 2008. “Cuore caldo o cervello freddo? Antiche controversie alla nascita delle neuroscienze”. Marco Piccolino (ed.), Neuroscienze controverse. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, pp. 3–48.
[Morgagni, Giovanni Battista]. 1705. Horatius de Florianis, Epistola, qua plus cento & qinquaginta errors ostenduntur. Luca Terranova, Altera epistola in illud idem argumentum. Rome: Typis Ioannis Francisci Buagni.
Needham, Joseph. 19592. A History of Embryology. New York: Abelard-Schuman.
Nuck, Anton. 1692. Operationes & experimenta chirurgica. Leiden: Apud Cornelium Boutesteyn.
Oster, Malcolm R. 1989. “The ‘Beame of Divinity’: Animal Suffering in the Early Thought of Robert Boyle.” British Journal for the History of Science. 22: 151–180.
Park, Katharine. 1994. “The Criminal and Saintly Body: Autopsy and Dissection in Renaissance Italy.” Renaissance Quarterly 47: 1–33.
Pecquet, Jean. 1653. New Anatomical Experiments. London: Octoavian Pulleyn, translation of Experimenta nova anatomica. Paris: Sebastian and Gabriel Cramoisy, 1651.
Ragland, Evan R. 2008. “Experimenting with Chemical Bodies: Reinier de Graaf’s Investigations of the Pancreas.” Early Science and Medicine 13: 615–664.
Ruestow, Edward G. 1996. The Microscope in the Dutch Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rupke, Nicolaas A. (ed.). 1987. Vivisection in Historical Perspective. London & New York: Croom Helm.
Schouten, Jan. 1974. “Johannes Walaeus (1604–1649) and His Experiments on the Circulation of the Blood.” Journal of the History of Medicine 29: 259–279.
Shank, Michael H. 1985. “From Galen’s Ureters to Harvey’s Veins.” Journal of the History of Biology 18: 331–355.
Siraisi, Nancy G. 1990. Medieval & Early Renaissance Medicine. An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Steintrager, Jmes A. 2004. Cruel Delight: Enlightenment Culture and the Inhuman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Steno, Nicolaus. 1910. Opera philosophica. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Vilhelm Tryde.
van Lieburg, Martin J. 1982. “Isaac Beeckman and his Diary-Notes on William Harvey’s Theory on Bloodcirculation (1633–1634).” Janus 69: 161–183.
von Staden, Heinrich. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wear, Andrew, French, Roger K., French, Lonie, and Iain, M. (eds.). 1985. The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, Charles. 1971. “The Helmontian George Thomson and William Harvey: The Revival and Application of Splenectomy to Physiological Research.” Medical History 15: 154–167.
Wepfer, Johann Jakob. 1679. Cicutae aquaticae historia et noxae. Basel: Joh. Rodolphum Konig.
Wilson, Catherine. 1995. The Invisible World. Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolfe, Charles. Forthcoming. “Why was There no Controversy over Life in the Scientific Revolution?” Vicor Boantza and Marcelo Dascal (eds.), Controversies in the Scientific Revolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Previous versions of this essay were delivered at venues on both sides of the Atlantic. I thank Hal Cook, Karin Ekholm, Evan Ragland, Bob Richards, Allen Shotwell, Nancy Siraisi, Fernando Vidal, the anonymous referees, and all those who offered comments on previous versions of my work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertoloni Meli, D. Early Modern Experimentation on Live Animals. J Hist Biol 46, 199–226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9327-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9327-7