Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university

Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plagiarism is a concept that is difficult to define. Although most higher education institutions have policies aimed at minimising and addressing student plagiarism, little research has examined the ways in which plagiarism is discursively constructed in university policy documents, or the connections and disconnections between institutional and student understandings of plagiarism in higher education. This article reports on a study that explored students’ understandings of plagiarism in relation to institutional plagiarism discourses at a New Zealand university. The qualitative study involved interviews with 21 undergraduate students, and analysis of University plagiarism policy documents. The University policy documents revealed moral and regulatory discourses. In the interviews, students predominantly drew on ethico-legal discourses, which reflected the discourses in the policy documents. However, the students also drew on (un)fairness discourses, confusion discourses, and, to a lesser extent, learning discourses. Notably, learning discourses were absent in the University policy. Our findings revealed tensions between the ways plagiarism was framed in institutional policy documents, and students’ understandings of plagiarism and academic writing. We suggest that, in order to support students’ acquisition of academic writing skills, plagiarism should be framed in relation to ‘learning to write’, rather than as a moral issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, L. (2016). Student perspectives on plagiarism. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_67-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Freewood, M., & Macdonald, R. (2003). The student lifeworld and the meanings of plagiarism. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 34(2), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, S. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., et al. (2014). ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V., & Howell, M. (2001). The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students’ views? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M., & Overfield, H. (2006). Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education, 8(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, J. (2010). Judging plagiarism: A problem of morality and convention. Higher Education, 59(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Plagiarism and second language writing in an electronic age. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, G. (2009). Judgments about plagiarism and plagiarising students in institutional definitions. In Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, 28–30 September, University of Wollongong. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/09-4apcei/4apcei-Grigg.pdf.

  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students’ understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. New York: Abler Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, C. (2014). Referencing and identity, voice and agency: Adult learners’ transformations within literacy practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaposi, D., & Dell, P. (2012). Discourses of plagiarism: Moralist, proceduralist, developmental and inter-textual approaches. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—Literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, L. G. (2009). University students’ perceptions of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. (2002). Beyond ‘gotcha!’: Situating plagiarism in policy and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 54(1), 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Otago. (2011a). Dishonest practice procedures. http://web.archive.org/web/20111103210226/http://www.otago.ac.nz/administration/policies/otago003145.html.

  • University of Otago. (2011b). Plagiarism. http://web.archive.org/web/20150125215208/http://www.otago.ac.nz/study/plagiarism/otago006307.html.

  • Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literary practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, I. (2012). Developing students’ referencing skills: A matter of plagiarism, punishment and morality or of learning to write critically? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 921–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, U., Andon, N., & Cogo, A. (2011). Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Adam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adam, L., Anderson, V. & Spronken-Smith, R. ‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. High Educ 74, 17–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0025-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0025-9

Keywords

Navigation