Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Linking research and teaching: Are research-active staff members different teachers?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the global competition of higher education, research intensity has become the key indicator of the quality of universities. This raises the issue of how, and whether at all, a research-intensive environment offers a better learning experience for students. One potential answer to this dilemma lies in research-related teaching. In this empirical paper we examine whether research-active staff members are indeed different teachers and whether they are more likely to use research-related teaching practices. Using data from a national survey of academic staff in Estonia (N = 679), we observe that research-active teachers are more likely to incorporate research outcomes into teaching, to engage students in research groups, and co-publish with students. The effects vary across disciplines, types of institutions, and different practices. Furthermore, it is not only the research intensity of the teachers that matters, but it is their intrinsic interest in both teaching and research that seems to contribute most to the use of such practices. The results show the benefit of protecting the research-teaching nexus for individual academics and the need to cultivate a commitment to both research and teaching in order to capitalise on the research-intensive environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto, A. (2015). The teaching and research nexus from an international perspective. In W. K. Cummings & U. Teichler (Eds.), The relevance of academic work in comparative perspective (pp. 91–106). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badley, G. (2002). A really useful link between teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 443–455.

  • Bak, H. J., & Kim, D. H. (2015). Too much emphasis on research? An empirical examination of the relationship between research and teaching in multitasking environments. Research in Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9372-0.

  • Beerkens, M. (2013). Market competition and concentration in the academic research industry: Evidence from Australia 1992-2008. Science & Public Policy, 40(2), 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S. L., & Cashin, W. E. (2010). Student ratings of teaching: a summary of research and literature. Idea Paper #50. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

  • Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 598–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research a framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coate, K., Barnett, R., & Williams, G. (2001). Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49(4), 495–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durning, B., & Jenkins, A. (2005). Teaching/research relations in departments: The perspectives of built environment academics. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K., & Wakelin, S. J. (2009). Re-conceptualising the concept of a nexus? A survey of 12 Scottish IS/IM academics’ perceptions of a nexus between teaching, research, scholarship and consultancy. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 133–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresty, K. A., Pan, W., Heffernan, T., & Edwards-Jones, A. (2013). Research-informed teaching from a risk perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. (2010). Higher education?. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell, J. (2008). The nexus of teaching and research: Evidence and insights from the literature. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (2000). Teacher thinking, beliefs, and knowledge in higher education: An introduction. Instructional Science, 28(5), 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). One journey to unravel the relationship between research and teaching. Conference paper. Research and teaching: Closing the divide? An international colloquium, 18–19 March 2004, Winchester, Hampshire. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/hattie/docs/relationship-between-research-and-teaching-(2004).pdf. Accessed 14 December 2014.

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HTM. (2012). Statistilised andmed õppejõudude kohta Eesti hariduse infosüsteemist. http://www.ehis.ee/. Accessed 1 November 2012

  • HTM. (2014). Statistilised andmed kõrghariduse kohta haridusstatistika andmebaasist HaridusSilm. Üliõpilaste arv õpete lõikes. http://www.haridussilm.ee/. Accessed 11 December 2014.

  • Jenkins, R. (2004). A Guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. J. (1988). Research and teaching in the universities of Denmark: Does such an interplay really exist? Higher Education, 17(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 201–214.

  • Kember, D. (1997). Reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (2013). The academic researcher role: enhancing expectations and improved performance. Higher Education, 65(4), 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, M. (2014). A critical evaluation of recent progress in understanding the role of the research-teaching link in higher education. Higher Education, 67(3), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1994). The teaching-research nexus: Applying a framework to university students’ learning experiences. European Journal of Education, 29(3), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozay, S. B. (2012). The dimensions of research in undergraduate learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Murray, P., & Cotton, D. (2011). Drivers, barriers and strategies for implementing research-informed teaching: A case study of the environmental building discipline.Conference paper. International Conference in Engineering Education (ICEE), 22–26 September 2011, Belfast, UK. http://www.ineer.org/events/icee2011/papers/icee2011_submission_102.doc. Accessed 30 December 2014.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Volume 2 A Third Deade of research. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

  • Remmik, M., & Karm, M. (2013). From teaching to guiding learning: novice university teachers’ conceptions of teaching. In E. Saar & R. Mõttus (Eds.), Higher education at the crossroad: The case of Estonia (pp. 199–216). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Bond, C. H. (2001). Experiences of the Relation between Teaching and Research: What do academics value? Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Bond, C. H. (2005). The research/teaching relation: A View from the ‘edge’. Higher Education, 50(3), 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (Eds.). (2013). Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M., & Elen, J. (2007). The ‘research-teaching nexus’ and ‘education through research’: An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., & Smith, A. (2012). Buying-out teaching for research: The views of academics and their managers. Higher Education, 63(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. K. (2013). The design and methods of the comparative study. In U. Teichler, A. Arimoto, & W. K. Cummings (Eds.), The changing academic profession: Major findings of a comparative survey (pp. 25–36)., Volume 1 of the changing academy—The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The Russell Group. (2009). Research-led learning: The heart of a Russell Group university experience. http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/uploads/Learning-in-a-research-intensive-environment.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2014.

  • Trigwell, K. (2005). Teaching-research relations, cross-disciplinary collegiality and student learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driel, J. H., Van der Rijst, R. M., Verloop, N., & Visser, A. (2010). The ideal research-teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: building profiles. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weert, E. & Beerkens, M. (2009). Research at universities of applied sciences in Europe: Conditions, achievements and perspectives. Report prepared for the European Network for Universities of Applied Sciences (UASNET). Enschede: CHEPS.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Salme 1a, 50103, Tartu, Estonia

    Eve Mägi

  2. Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Postbus 13228, 2501 EE, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Maarja Beerkens

Authors
  1. Eve Mägi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maarja Beerkens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Mägi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mägi, E., Beerkens, M. Linking research and teaching: Are research-active staff members different teachers?. High Educ 72, 241–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9951-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9951-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation