Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Academic staff quality in higher education: an empirical analysis of Portuguese public administration education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education accreditation frameworks typically consider academic staff quality a key element. This article embarks on an empirical study of what academic staff quality means, how it is measured, and how different aspects of staff quality relate to each other. It draws on the relatively nascent Portuguese experience with study programme accreditation. The study provides an analysis of staff quality in public administration education, an area of massive expansion in recent years. Several dimensions of quality are assessed (staff qualifications, research intensity, disciplinary orientation, diversity, international orientation, professional orientation, and inbreeding) along with the interactions that occur between them. A statistical analysis is made of the indicators for all 21 study programmes in the area of public administration, involving 236 academics in six public universities. We find that, in general, the quality of academic staff complies with standards, but there are issues regarding qualifications and research intensity that need to be addressed. The findings emphasise the need to uphold academic staff quality standards but call for policies to curtail possible gaming resulting from it. The article illustrates the relevance of analysing staff quality from an empirical point of view and its contribution to our understanding of how different quality accreditation processes function and their implications for how quality is achieved in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A3ES. (2009). Regulations on the assessment and accreditation procedures. Lisboa: Agência de Avaliação e Acreditação do Ensino Superior.

    Google Scholar 

  • A3ES. (2013). Auditing internal quality assurance systems in higher education institutions, manual for the audit process. Lisboa: Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Lewis, L. S. (1996). The academic profession in international perspective. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries (pp. 3–48). Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. A. (2011). The Portuguese malaise: Structural causes of the crisis and lessons for the eurozone. Economic Affairs, 31(2), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. A. (2014). In the eye of the storm: Portugal and the European crisis. In L. C. Ferreira-Pereira (Ed.), Portugal in the European Union: Assessing twenty-five years of integration experience. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. A., & Moreira, J. M. (2006). Key issues for the training of senior civil servants in the context of public administration reform in Portugal. Oeiras: Instituto Nacional de Administração.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2005). Introduction. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 1–8). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragues, G. (2012). Portugal’s plight: The role of social democracy. The Independent Review, 16(3), 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2003). Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter: The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 78–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, S. (2012). Students’ perceptions of quality assessment – is there an option besides treating them as consumers? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. S. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change (in press). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., & Sin, C. (2015). The quality of teaching staff: Higher education institutions’ compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance—the case of Portugal. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,. doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9211-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caupers, J. (1999). Public administration programmes in Portugal. In T. Verheijen & B. Connaughton (Eds.), Higher education programmes in public administration: Ready for the challenge of europeanisation? (pp. 32–35). Limerick: Centre for European Studies, University of Limerick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenges of the quality movement (3rd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielecka, E., Brdulak, J., Miller, P., & Doroszewicz, S. (2013). European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance and Teaching Staff. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 4, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Márquez, B. L., Escudero-Torres, M. Á., & Hurtado-Torres, N. E. (2013). Being highly internationalised strengthens your reputation: An empirical investigation of top higher education institutions. Higher Education, 66(5), 619–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2015). Fiscal retrenchment in southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Public Management Review, 17(1), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (2013). Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: Lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality. Higher Education, 65(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EAPAA. (2013). Accreditation criteria, version 9. Enschede: European Association for Public Administration Accreditation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2005). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2006). Quality Assurance of Higher Education in Portugal: An assessment of the existing system and recommendations for a future system. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2009). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (3rd ed.). Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). The economic adjustment for Portugal. European economy occasional papers (Vol. 79). Brussels: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPEARI. (2011). Fluxos e situação profissional dos doutorados em Portugal – 2009 [Flows and professional status of PhDs in Portugal - 2009]. Lisboa: Gabinete de Planeamento, Estratégia, Avaliação e Relações Internacionais.

  • Green, D. (1994). What is quality in higher education? Concepts, policy and practice. In D. Green (Ed.), What is quality in higher education (pp. 3–20). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomarch, A. (1999). ‘Public service’, ‘public management’ and the ‘modernization’ of French public administration. Public Administration, 77(1), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, G. (2003). Diversity and convergence: A quantitative analysis of European public administration education programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4), 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2006). Impact of quality assurance: Overview of a discussion between representatives of external quality assurance agencies. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 287–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2007). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1992). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., Veloso, F. M., & Grediaga, R. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inanc, O., & Tuncer, O. (2011). The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics, 88(3), 885–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (1996). Expansion and diversification of public administration in the postwar state: The case of the Netherlands. Public Administration, 56(1), 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M. (2005). Distinctiveness in the study of public management in Europe. Public Management Review, 7(4), 537–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2002). Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langfeldt, L., Stensaker, B., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). The role of peer review in Norwegian quality assurance: Potential consequences for excellence and diversity. Higher Education, 59(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Sousa, S., Ribeiro, F., & Santiago, R. (2013). Creating a common grammar for higher education governance. Higher Education, 65(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magone, J. (2011). The difficult transformation of state and public administration in Portugal: Europeanization and the persistence of neo-patrimonialism. Public Administration, 89(3), 756–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, J. M., & Alves, A. A. (2008). Ciências da administração, gestão pública e governação em Portugal. In J. M. Moreira, C. Jalali, & A. A. Alves (Eds.), Estado, Sociedade Civil e Administração Pública: Para um Novo Paradigma do Serviço Público (pp. 99–110). Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2004). Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education, 48(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2005). European academic labor markets in transition. Higher Education, 49(1/2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASPAA. (2009). Accreditation standards for master’s degree programs. Arlington, VA: National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Frascati manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Sarrico, C. S., & Moreira, J. M. (2006). Trust in Portuguese public authorities. Public Integrity, 8(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, C. (1998). Educational training for new public management. International Public Management Journal, 1(2), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2003). International experience and academic careers. Personnel Review, 32(6), 774–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Amaral, A. (2012). Is there a bridge between quality and quality assurance? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. S. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change (pp. 114–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Amaral, A. (2014). Quality assurance in higher education: Contemporary debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012). Quality, evaluation and accreditation: From steering, through compliance, on to enhancement and innovation? In A. Amaral & G. R. Neave (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009. A nation, a generation (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., Sarrico, C. S., & Amaral, A. (2012). Academics’ perceptions on the purposes of quality assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, F., Rosser, C., Hurni, P. Y., & Mavrot, C. (2012). How traditional are the American, French and German traditions of public administration? A research agenda. Public Administration, 90(1), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrico, C. S., Rosa, M. J., Teixeira, P. N., & Cardoso, M. F. (2010). Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: Worlds apart or complementary views? Minerva, 48(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Langfeldt, L., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). The Impact of the European standards and guidelines in agency evaluations. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoleroff, A. (2013). Employment relations and unions in public administration in Portugal and Spain: From reform to austerity. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(4), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, L. V., & Alves, A. A. (2006). The future of Portuguese public administration and a new agenda for public administration sciences in the 21st century. Public Administration, 84(2), 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P. N., Cardoso, M. F., Sarrico, C. S., & Rosa, M. J. (2007). The Portuguese public university system: On the road to improvement? In A. Bonnaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation (pp. 347–375). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., & Pina, V. (2004). Reshaping public administration: The Spanish experience compared to the UK. Public Administration, 82(2), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (1995). Improvement and accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guide for external quality assessment in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B., & Rosa, M. J. (2007a). Introduction. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B., & Rosa, M. J. (2007b). Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B., Rosa, M. J., & Corbett, A. (2014). Next generations, catwalks, random walks and arms races: Conceptualising the development of quality assurance schemes. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. They would also like to thank A3ES for providing the data. C. S. Sarrico acknowledges support by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under Grant PEst-OE/CED/UI0757/2011 (which is funded by the Program COMPETE).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ISEG Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua do Quelhas 6, 1200-781, Lisbon, Portugal

    Cláudia S. Sarrico

  2. CIPES Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies, Rua 1° de Dezembro 399, 4450-227, Matosinhos, Portugal

    Cláudia S. Sarrico

  3. Universidade Católica Portuguesa - Instituto de Estudos Políticos, Palma de Cima, 1649-023, Lisbon, Portugal

    André A. Alves

Authors
  1. Cláudia S. Sarrico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André A. Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cláudia S. Sarrico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarrico, C.S., Alves, A.A. Academic staff quality in higher education: an empirical analysis of Portuguese public administration education. High Educ 71, 143–162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9893-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9893-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation