Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivations of faculty engagement in internationalization: a survey in China

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faculty plays a critical role in the growing trend of internationalization in higher education. Thus, it is important to understand the factors that drive faculty members to get involved in internationalization. Employing structural equation model with data gathered from questionnaire, this study attempts to explore how faculty engagement in internationalization is motivated based on a survey in China, and institution type is also considered in our model. Our findings suggest that in the overall sample, both individual and environmental motivations positively relate to faculty engagement in internationalization, and individual motivation is the more critical predictor. One striking result is that individual motivation plays a complete mediating factor between environmental motivation and faculty engagement in internationalization, suggesting the significance of transferring institutional incentives to faculty’s individual competence and efficacy. Institution type significantly accounts for environmental motivations. As to key university, the result was consistent with above. In general institution, however, the effect of environmental motivation is insignificant, indicating that sufficient funding is indispensable for the internationalization ambition of institutions. The implications for research and policy conclude this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The fit statistics of model for sample of general undergraduate institutions (N = 194) had deflected data: RMSEA (>0.08) and AGFI (<0.90), which might indicate that our sample size was not large enough, based on the study of Bentler and Yuan (1999). With such a doubt, we collected sample again from general undergraduate institutions during December 2014. Together with the added sample, a new sample (N = 246) of general undergraduate institutions was formed and accepted.

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto, A. (2009). Changing academic profession in the world from 1992–2007, In RIHE international seminar reports. The changing academic profession over 1992–2007: International, comparative, and quantitative perspectives (report of the international conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project, pp.1–38), Japan: Hiroshima University.

  • Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R.T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Blackburn, R. T., Lawrence, J. H., et al. (1991a). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship, and service. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Lawrence, J. H., et al. (1991b). Faculty at work: Focus on teaching. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ch., Zeng, M., Wen, D., Weng, L., & Yu, Zh. (2009). The survey and evaluation indicators for internationalization of research universities in China. Peking University Education Review, 4, 116–135. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, L. K. (2009). Planning for internationalization by investing in faculty. Journal of International and Global Studies, 1(1), 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, L. K. (2010). The twenty-first century university: Developing faculty engagement in internationalization. Peter Lang.

  • Colbeck, C. L., & Weaver, L. D. (2008). Faculty engagement in public scholarship: a motivation systems theory perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(2), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. ASHE-ERIC higher education report 1985, no. 4. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 237–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S., & Rhoads, R. A. (1995). Teaching and the faculty role: Enhancing the commitment to instruction in American colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M., Walker, E., & Chen, R. (2013). The American faculty in an age of globalization: Predictors of internationalization of research content and professional networks. Higher Education, 66(3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y. (2014). Constructing internationalisation in flagship universities from the policy-maker’s perspective. High Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9834-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. F. (2002). Joining the world: The challenge of internationalizing undergraduate education. Change Magazine, 34, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, M. (1981). Internationalizing the curriculum and the campus: Guidelines for AASCU institutions. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5, 135–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F. (2003). Policy and practice of the internationalization of higher education in China. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(3), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F., Finkelstein, M., & Rostan, M. (Eds.). (2014a). The internationalization of the academy: Rhetoric, recent trends, and prospects. Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7278-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F., Teichler, U., & Galaz-Fontes, J. F. (2014b). Regionalisation of higher education and the academic profession in Asia, Europe and North America. In F. Huang, M. Finkelstein, & M. Rostan (Eds.), The internationalization of the academy: Rhetoric, recent trends, and prospects (pp. 145–181). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, D. F., Yilmazsoylu, M., & Duke, B. (2011). Validation of the motivation to teach scale. H.U. Journal of Education, 40, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of studies in international education, 8(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. Higher education in turmoil. (2008) The changing world of internationalisation. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Lechuga, V. M. (2014). A motivation perspective on faculty mentoring: the notion of “non- intrusive” mentoring practices in science and engineering. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9751-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self- determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(6), 59–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push–pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education, 53(6), 791–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., & Eddy, P. M. (2014). The role of e-learning for faculty development in China. The New Educational Review, 35(1), 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Shu, J., & Zeng, X. (2014). A comparative study on academic profession internationalization between China and the USA. Comparative Education Review, 36(10), 97–103. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., & Tu, Y. (2012). Faculty’s limited engagement in higher education internationalization. Fudan Education Forum, 10(6), 54–58. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.(2011). Internationalizing Chinese higher education institutions. M.A. dissertation, The University of British Columbia.

  • Liu, H., Liu, J., & Chi, X. (2014). Regulatory mechanism of self-determination involvement in higher education: assessing Chinese students’ experiences. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9640-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. Walker, E., Chen, R. (2009). The internationalization of the American faculty: where are we? What drives or deters us? In RIHE international seminar reports. The changing academic profession over 1992–2007: International, comparative, and quantitative perspectives (report of the international conference on the changing Academic Profession Project, pp.113-144), Japan: Hiroshima University.

  • Mohrman, K., Geng, Y., &Wang, Y.(2011). Faculty life in China. The NEA 2011 Almanac of higher education. Accessed May 20, 2012. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/H-Mohrman_28Feb11_p83-100.pdf

  • Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). Should we use SEM? Pros and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. (2008). Motivation for faculty community engagement: Learning from exemplars. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIHE international seminar reports. (2009). The Changing academic profession over 1992-2007: international, comparative, and quantitative perspectives, report of the international conference on the Changing Academic Profession project, Japan: Hiroshima University.

  • Rostan, M., Finkelstein, M., & Huang, F. (2014). A profile of CAP participating countries and a global overview of academic internationalization in 2007-2998. In F. Huang, M. Finkelstein, & M. Rostan (Eds.), The internationalization of the academy: Rhetoric, recent trends, and prospects (pp. 37–54). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7278-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rostan, M., & Höhle, E. A. (2014). The international mobility of faculty. In F. Huang, M. Finkelstein & M. Rostan (Eds.), The internationalization of the academy: rhetoric, recent trends, and prospects (pp. 79–104). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7278-6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwietz, M. S.(2006). Internationalization of the academic profession: An exploratory study of faculty attitudes, beliefs and involvement at public universities in Pennsylvania. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Stohl, M. (2007). We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Office of Institutional Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2004). Results of the Faculty International Issues Survey. Accessed 5 April 2012. http://cgi.unc.edu/uploads/media_items/2004-faculty-international-survey.original.pdf.

  • Tien, F. F. (2000). To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research? Testing the expectancy theory. Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 723–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self- determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2014). China’s Elite Sector and National Projects. In Rumbley, L.E., Helms, R.M., Peterson, P.M., & Altbach, P.G. (Eds.),Global opportunities and challenges for higher education leaders: Briefs on key themes (pp.87–90). SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-863-3_21.

  • Welch, A. R. (1997). The peripatetic professor: the internationalisation of the academic profession. Higher Education, 34(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (2008). Internationalization of the curriculum: a remedy for international students’ academic adjustment difficulties? Ph.D. dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

  • Yang, R. (2004). Progress and paradoxes: New developments in China’s higher education. In M. Ka-Ho (Ed.), Centralization and decentralization (pp. 173–200). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2005). The Chinese professoriate in comparative perspective. In A. Welch (Ed.), The professoriate: Profile of a profession (pp. 179–192). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2014). China’s Internationalization Strategy. In Rumbley, L.E., Helms, R.M., Peterson, P.M., & Altbach, P.G. (Eds.), Global Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education Leaders: Briefs on Key Themes (pp. 95-98). SensePublishers.doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-863-3_21.

  • Yang, R., & Welch, A. R. (2010). Globalisation, transnational academic mobility and the Chinese knowledge diaspora: An Australian case study. Discourse (Abingdon): Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 593–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, B. (2011). Internationalization at home: The path to internationalization in Chinese research universities. Chinese Education and Society, 44(5), 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Hunan University, #7, 2 Lushan South Road, Changsha, 410082, China

    Bihong Li & Yangjun Tu

Authors
  1. Bihong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yangjun Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bihong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Tu, Y. Motivations of faculty engagement in internationalization: a survey in China. High Educ 71, 81–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9890-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9890-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation