Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Opening the gates or coping with the flow? Governing access to higher education in Northern and Central Europe

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Access to higher education has become a key policy issue in most European countries in since the last half of the last century. We trace the historical development of the ways in which governments in two countries within the region, Norway and Poland, have attempted to steer developments. Three access waves or phases are identified and contextualized, by illuminating dominant policy logics and tensions. Our analysis suggests that “coping with the flow” reflects a continuous attempt to instrumentalize higher education and make it serve different political goals: equity, efficiency, and responsiveness. As for the institutions, these have either resisted or embraced government-led initiatives while protecting their institutional autonomy. We show empirical evidence of the fact that the two countries have undergone similar waves and policy measures, yet these have resulted in distinct institutional responses due to national peculiarities, history, local politics, and deeply rooted academic traditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Norway, work has started (in 2011) in order to integrate the national qualifications framework (for lifelong learning) with EQF (consult NOKUT 2011). New regulations are expected during the first half of 2014.

References

  • Aamodt, P. O. (1995). Floods, bottlenecks and backwaters: An analysis of expansion in higher education in Norway. Higher Education, 30, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aamodt, P. (2006). Access to higher education within a welfare state system: Developments and dilemmas. In P. Teixeira, D. B. Johnstone, M. Rosa, & H. Vossensteyn (Eds.), Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education: A fairer deal? Springer, Netherlands, pp. 317–341.

  • Aamodt, P. O., & Kyvik, S. (2005). Access to higher education in the Nordic countries. In T. Tapper & D. Palfreyman (Eds.), Understanding mass higher education. Comparative perspectives on access. London, New York: Routledgefalmer, pp. 121–138.

  • Antonowicz, D. & Gorlewski B. (2011). Demograficzne Tsunami. Raport Instytutu Sokratesa na temat wpływu zmian demograficznych na szkolnictwo wyższe do 2020 roku[Demographic Tsunami. The Report pf Socrates’ Institute on the impact of demographic changes on higher education till 2020]. Warszawa: Instytut Sokratesa.

  • Antonowicz, D. (2012). External influences and local responses. Changes in polish higher education 1990–2005. In: P. Maassen, M. Kwiek (eds.), National higher education reforms in a European context: Comparative reflections on Poland and Norway. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 87–111.

  • Białecki (1997). “Strategie polskiej edukacji” [Strategies of Polish education]. Nauki i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 10, 22–37.

  • Bisson, P., Kirkland, R., & Stephenson, E. (2010). The market state. New York: McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., Høstaker, R., & Vabø, A. (2000). Policy and practices in higher education: Reforming Norwegian universities. London: Jessica-Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1993). The university system: Engine of development in the new world economy. In A. Ransom, S. Khoo & V. Selvaratnam (Eds.), Improving higher education in developing countries (pp. 65–80). Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (2005). Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Stensaker, B., Smeby, J.-C., & De Boer, H. (2004). Contract arrangements in the Nordic countries: solving the efficiency-effectiveness dilemma? Higher Education in Europe, 29, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUS. (2013). Szkoły wyższe i ich finanse (Higher education and its finance). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

    Google Scholar 

  • KD. (2005). Act relating to universities and university colleges (overview of the law in English). Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research. Online at: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/doc/laws/acts/act-relating-to-universities-and-univers.html?id=213307.

  • KD. (2012). Long-term perspectives: Knowledge provides opportunity, Meld. St. 18 (2012–2013) report to the storting, White Paper. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.

  • Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (2013). The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges. Dordrecht: Springer London, Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in dutch higher education. Governance, 8(1), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2009). The two decades of privatization in polish higher education. Cost-sharing, equity, and access. In J. Knight (Ed.), Financing access and equity in higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Kwiek, M. (2012). Changing higher education policies: From the deinstitutionalization to the reinstitutionalization of the research mission in Polish universities. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2014). Social perceptions versus economic returns of the higher education: The Bologna process in Poland. In T. Kozma, M. Rébay, A. Óhidy, & É. Szolár (Eds.), The Bologna process in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 147–182). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (1981). The Norwegian regional colleges: A study of the establishment and implementation of a reform in higher education. Oslo: Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities.

  • Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44(1), 53–72.

  • Kyvik, S. (2009). The dynamics of change in higher education: Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2011). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 61(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (eds). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Melbourne, Madrid & Cape Town: Cambridge University Press.

  • Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: A ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P. H. (1997). Human resource management, leaders, laggards, and followers. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(2), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2002). The stakeholder perspective historically explored. In J. Enders, & O. Fulton, (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world: International trends and mutual observations: A festschrift in honour of Ulrich Teichler. Springer, Berlin, pp. 17–37.

  • NOKUT. (2011). Referencing the Norwegian qualifications framework (NKR) levels to the European qualifications framework (EQF): Report to the Norwegian referencing group. Oslo: Norwegian Quality Assurance Agency. Online at: http://www.nokut.no/documents/nokut/artikkelbibliotek/norsk_utdanning/nkr/referencing_the_norwegian_qualifications_framework_(nkr)_levels_to_the_european_qualifications_framework_(eqf).pdf.

  • NOU. (2006). Academic freedom: Individual rights and institutional management needs. NOU 2006/19. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.Online at: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kd/documents/Official-Norwegian-Reports-/2006/NOU-2006-nr-19-Academic-freedom.html?id=392466.

  • NOU. (2008). Sett under ett: ny struktur i høyere utdanning, Norges offtenlige utredninger. Oslo: Statens Forvaltningstjeneste.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSD-DBH (2013). Norwegian social science data services. Online at: http://www.Nsd.Uib.No/English/.

  • OECD. (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (2008). Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

  • Pinheiro, R. (2012). Knowledge and the ‘Europe of the regions’: The case of the high north. In M. Kwiek & P. Maassen (Eds.), National higher education reforms in a European context: Comparative reflections on Poland and Norway (pp. 179–208). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2013). Bridging the local with the global: Building a new university on the fringes of Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(2), 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., & Kyvik, S. (2009). Norway: Separate but connected. In N. Garrod & B. Macfarlane (Eds.), Challenging boundaries: Managing the integration of post-secondary education (pp. 47–58). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, pp. 1–20.

  • Popłonkowski, T. (1996). Autonomia uczelni, instytucjonalne ograniczenia autonomii, kierunki zmian. In M. Dąbrowa-Szefler & M. Pastwa (Eds.), Finansowanie i zarządzanie szkolnictwem wyższym Polska-Holandia. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlak, J. (1991). The development of higher education in Eastern and Central Europe and the aftermath of recent changes. Prospects, 12(3), 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein, F., & Berdahl, R. (2005). Autonomy and accountability: Who controls academe? In P. Altbach, R. Berdahl, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 71–90). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. New york: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulc, T. (2004). “Dynamika przemian w szkolnictwie wyższym w Polsce a realizacja procesu bolońskiego”[Dynamics of changes of Polish higher education in the context of the Bologna process]. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 24, 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2005). Understanding mass higher education: Comparative perspectives on access. Milton Park: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1970). Reflections on the transition from mass to universal higher education. Daedalus, 99(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M., & Burrage, M. (2010). Twentieth-century higher education: Elite to mass to universal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vabo, A., & Aamodt, P. O. (2005). Kvalitetsreformen og universitetene som masseutdanningsinstitusjon. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.

  • Vught, F. (2009). Diversity and Differentiation in Higher Education. In F. Vught (Ed.), Mapping the higher education landscape (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The article benefited from a research grant (DEC-2011/02/AHS6/00183) from the Polish National Research Council. We would like to thank Professors Ted Tapper, Pundy Pillay, Marek Kwiek and Peter Maassen as well as two anonymous reviews for insightful and constructive suggestions in an earlier version of the paper. Any remaining errors are the authors’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Agder, Post Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway

    Rómulo Pinheiro

  2. Department of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland

    Dominik Antonowicz

Authors
  1. Rómulo Pinheiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominik Antonowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rómulo Pinheiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinheiro, R., Antonowicz, D. Opening the gates or coping with the flow? Governing access to higher education in Northern and Central Europe. High Educ 70, 299–313 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9830-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9830-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation