Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of Chinese and Australian university academics’ valence for teaching and cross-disciplinary research

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate reforms have taken place in Australian and Chinese higher education systems to increase efficiency and productivity, and to accommodate the emergence of global markets by exposing universities to market competition. The competing demands of teaching and research arguably have emerged as an important issue for both Australian and Chinese higher education. This study provides insights into the two primary functions of higher education, namely teaching and research. Expectancy Theory is used to investigate Chinese and Australian university academics’ valence for teaching and cross-disciplinary research, with reference to the key individual cultural values at the individual level, allocentrism and idiocentrism. A two-stage cluster sampling method was employed to select Chinese and Australian university academics. The Chinese sample comprised 213 universities academics from Beijing and Hangzhou, and the Australian sample consisted of 112 academics drawn from universities in Australia. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to identify factors in the Chinese and Australian data. The common factors identified for the Chinese and Australian samples were then compared, and posited hypotheses tested. There was no statistically significant difference between the Chinese and Australian participants’ valence for teaching. However, the Australian academics reported significantly higher valence for cross-disciplinary research than the Chinese academics. In general, the Australian academics scored significantly higher on idiocentric factors and lower on allocentric factors than their Chinese counterparts. Findings suggest that it may be helpful to categorise academic activities according to individual and group orientations and matching academic activities with academics’ cultural orientations may improve their motivation. In order to promote cross-disciplinary research, an environment of in-group cooperation may need to be fostered before any real progress can take place, especially when academics with allocentric orientations are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y., Segall, M., & Dasen, P. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., & Triandis, H. C. (2006). Culture. In K. Pawlik & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), Psychological concepts: An international historical perspective (pp. 47–62). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canaan, J. E., & Shumar, W. (2008). Higher education in the era of globalization and neoliberalism. In J. E. Caanan & W. Shumar (Eds.), Structure and agency in the neoliberal university (pp. 1–32). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., & Radhakrishnan, P. (2000). Allocentrism and idiocentrism as predictors of in-group perceptions: An individual difference extension of cultural patterns. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J., Barry, J., & Clark, H. (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55(9), 1051–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Lee, S.-Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. E. (2008). Study abroad for Chinese university presidents: How China is reforming higher education. Change, 40(3), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., & Newson, J. (1998). Universities and globalisation: Critical perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J. (2012). Harmonious expansion of China’s higher education: A new growth pattern. Higher Education, 63, 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B., Lee, C. M., Assessing, M., et al. (2003). Assessing the validity of self construal scales: A response to Levine et al. Human Communication Research, 29(2), 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. (1996). The relationship between teaching and research—A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, R. (1996). China’s universities, 1895–1995: A century of cultural conflict. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K. P., & Greenholz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, B., Rushbrook, P., & Smith, E. (2005). To publish or not to publish: that is the question? Learned Publishing, 18, 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980, Summer). Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1),42–63.

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D., & Toye, J. (2006). The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being. Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), 1085–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, L. (1999). Motives and performance: Why academics research?. Caulfield East: Victoria: Monash University: Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L., & Rosser, V. (2002). Faculty members’ morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & Ç. Kağitçibaşi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1–49). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U. (1995). Individualism and collectivism: A psychological, cultural and ecological analysis. Copenhagen: NIAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. R., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., Shearman, S. M., et al. (2003). Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29(2), 210–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, G., Gamba, R. J., & Marin, B. V. (1992). Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relationship between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73, 603–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in a cross-cultural environment: survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2013, December 14). http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_634/201205/135137.html.

  • Neumann, B. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Daily Online. (2011, March 11). http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/98649/7315789.html.

  • Pratt, G., & Poole, D. (2000). Global corporations ‘R’ us? The impacts of globalization on Australian universities. Australian Universities Review, 42(2), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. (2007). Where the students are in East Asia? International Educator, 16(4), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). When paradigms clash: Comments on Cameron and Pierce’s claim that rewards do not undermine intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruent effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Journal of Management, 26, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P., & Verma, J. (1987). Structure of collectivism. In Ç. Kağitçibaşi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 123–129). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, M. (2010). Education system reform in China after 1978: Some practical implications. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(4), 314–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). Self and social behavior in differing social contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (2011). Governance and Trust in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. (1995). Work and motivation (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness. Instructional Evaluation, 9, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. P., & Sarros, J. C. (2001). Corporate reforms to Australian universities: Views from the academic heartland. Caulfield, Victoria: Monash University, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2009). Enter the dragon: China’s higher education returns to the world community. In J. Smart & W. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and practice (pp. 431–467). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2011). Self and the other in the Confucian cultural context: Implications of China’s higher education development for comparative studies. International Review of Education, 57, 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., & Welch, A. (2001). Internationalising Chinese universities: A study of Guangzhou. World Studies in Education, 2(1), 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Edward Feng Li & Kerry Barnett

  2. Interdisciplinary Educational Research Institute, School of Education, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    John McCormick

Authors
  1. Edward Feng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John McCormick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerry Barnett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Feng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, E.F., McCormick, J. & Barnett, K. A comparison of Chinese and Australian university academics’ valence for teaching and cross-disciplinary research. High Educ 69, 583–605 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9792-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9792-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation