Abstract
This study features the concept of ‘context’ and how various macro, meso and micro features of the social system play themselves out in any setting. Using South Africa as an example, it explores the features that may constrain or enable professional development, quality teaching and the work of teaching and learning centres at eight universities in varied socio-cultural settings. The article draws on the work of critical realists and their explication of the concepts of structure, culture and agency. The research design was participatory, where members of teaching and learning centres at the eight institutions defined the aims and key questions for the study. They collected the data on which this article is based, namely a series of descriptive and reflective reports. The findings clustered around six themes: history, geography and resources; leadership and administrative processes; beliefs about quality teaching and staff development; recognition and appraisal; and capacity, image and status of the TLC staff. These features play out in unique and unpredictable constellations in each different context, while at the same time, clusters of features adhere together. Whilst there is no one to one, predictive relationship between university type and outcome, there is a sense that socio-economic contextual features are salient and require greater attention than other features.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As a policy reform initiative, from 2002 to 2005 31 higher education institutions in South Africa were merged or unbundled into 19 institutions. The merged institutions were challenged thereafter to become administrative, culturally and educationally cohesive.
A school which during the apartheid era would serve predominantly white children and was usually well-resourced.
References
Archer, M. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(Supplement 1), 222–252.
Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (1996). Culture and Agency: The place of culture in social theory. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2000). For structure: Its reality, properties and powers: A reply to Anthony King. The Sociological Review, 48(3), 464–472.
Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S., & Elder-Vass, D. (2012). Cultural system or norm circles? An exchange. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 93–115.
Badat, S. (2012). Redressing the colonial/apartheid legacy: Social equity, redress, and higher education admissions in democratic South Africa. In Z. Hasan & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Equalizing access: Affirmative action in higher education in India, United States, and South Africa (pp. 121–150). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bamber, V., Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2009). Introduction: Continuities, enhancement and higher education. In V. Bamber, P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & M. Enhancing (Eds.), Learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum in higher education (pp. 1–6). Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw Hill.
Berliner, D. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and scientific realism. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16–47). London: Routledge.
Blackmore, P., Chambers, J., Huxley, L., & Thackwray, B. (2010). Tribalism and territoriality in the staff and educational development world. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 105–117.
Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2011). A meta-analysis of teaching and learning at five historically disadvantaged universities. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.
Boughey, C., & Niven, P. (2012). The emergence of research in the South African academic development movement. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 641–653.
Bozalek, V., & Boughey, C. (2012). (Mis) framing higher education in South Africa. Social Policy and Administration, 46(6), 688–703.
Candy, P. (1996). Promoting lifelong learning: Academic developers and the university as a learning organization. International Journal for Academic Development, 1(1), 7–19.
D’Andrea, V. M., & Gosling, D. (2005). Improving teaching and learning: A whole institution approach. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
Department of Education. (2001). National Plan for Higher Education. http://education.pwv.gov.za/Doe_sites/Higher. Accessed 6 Mar 2001.
Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The causal power of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gosling, D. (2009). Report on the survey of directors of academic development in South African universities. Stellenbosch, South Africa: HELTASA.
Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasising reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283–310.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
Lave, J. (2012). Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 156–171.
Le Roux, P., & Breier, M. (2012). Steering from a distance: Improving access to higher education in South Africa via the funding formula. Johannesburg: Friedrich Ebert Stigting.
Leibowitz, B. (2012). Understanding the challenges of the South African higher education landscape. In B. Leibowitz, L. Swartz, V. Bozalek, R. Carolissen, L. Nicholls, & P. Rohleder (Eds.), Community, self and identity: Educating South African university students for citizenship (pp. 3–18). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Leibowitz, B., & Bozalek, V. (2014). Access to higher education in South Africa: A social realist account. Widening Participation (in press).
Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58(5), 619–635.
Mathieson, S. (2012). Disciplinary cultures of teaching and learning as socially situated practice: Rethinking the space between social constructivism and epistemological essentialism from the South African experience. Higher Education, 63, 549–564.
Maxwell, J. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Porpora, D. (1998). Four concepts of social structure. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 339–354). London: Routledge.
Quinn, L. (2012). Enabling and constraining conditions for academic staff development. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Re-imagining academic staff development: Spaces for disruption (pp. 27–50). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.
Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). Higher education monitor: A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Pretoria: Council for higher education. http://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/publications/HE_Monitor_6_ITLS_Oct2007_0.pdf.
Soudien, C. (2012). The promise of the university: What it’s become and where it could go. In B. Leibowitz (Ed.), Higher education for the public good: Views from the south (pp. 31–44). Stellenbosch: Sun Media.
South African Institute for Race Relations (SAIRR). (2012). South Africa Survey 2012. Education. Unit for risk analysis.
Trigwell, K. (2001). Judging university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 65–73.
Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Trowler, P. (2011). Doing insider research in universities. Kindle edition.
Volbrecht, T., & Boughey, C. (2004). Curriculum responsiveness from the margins: The case of academic development. In: H. Griesel (Ed.), Curriculum responsiveness: Case studies in higher edcuation (pp. 57–80). Pretoria: SAUWCA.
Acknowledgments
The National Research Foundation provided funding for the project titled “Context, structure and agency” (reference ESA20100729000013945). The authors acknowledge the contributions to the data by the members of the Context, Structure and Agency research team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leibowitz, B., Bozalek, V., van Schalkwyk, S. et al. Institutional context matters: the professional development of academics as teachers in South African higher education. High Educ 69, 315–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9777-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9777-2