Abstract
Higher education in the UK has become preoccupied with debates over the authority of knowledge and of criticality. In this article we argue that approaches to knowledge in higher education might benefit from a network sensibility that foregrounds the negotiated processes through which the material becomes entangled with the social to bring forth actions, subjectivities and ideas. We draw from a set of analytic perspectives that have arisen from actor-network theory traditionally associated with the writings of Bruno Latour. These approaches emphasise the contingent in knowledge production, even to claim that objects, knowledge or otherwise, come into being through enactment as effects within particular webs of relations. What becomes visible in such analysis is the precarious fragility of concepts and categories often assumed to be immutable, and the work required to establish their stability. We argue that this actor-network analysis helps to move away from a focus on separate entities and individuals to understand their material relationality. This analysis also foregrounds the controversies that tend to be foreclosed in what Latour calls ‘matters of fact’, and makes visible the different worlds in which knowing is evoked in practice. From this departure point the issue of interest is not which knowledge accounts are superior but how and when particular accounts become more visible or valued, how they circulate, and what work they perform in the process. These approaches afford a criticality that we argue open important entry points for rethinking curriculum, teaching and learning in higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies (thinking gender). New York: Routledge. 1993.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Berg, M., & Mol, A. (1998). Differences in medicine: Unravelling practices, techniques and bodies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory and education. London: Routledge.
Fountain, R. M. (1999). Socio-scientific issues via actor network theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 339–358.
Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 853–867.
Fox, S. (2005). An actor-network critique of community in higher education: Implications for networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 95–110.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Goodfellow, R., & Lamy, M.-N. (Eds.). (2009). Learning cultures in online education. London: Continuum.
Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 36(3), 253–265.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harman, G. (2007). The importance of Bruno Latour for philosophy. Cultural Studies Review, 13(1), 31–49.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Blackwell.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2011). Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor- network theorist. International Journal of Communication, 5, 796–810.
Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns (trans. C. Porter). Boston: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage Publications.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4), 379–393.
Law, J. (2004). Making a mess with method. In W. Outhwaite & S. P. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 595–606). London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
Law, J. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
Luck, J. T. (2008). Lost in translations: A socio-technical study of interactive videoconferencing at an Australian University. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Central Queensland University.
McGregor, J. (2004). Spatiality and the place of the material in schools. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(3), 347–372.
Mol, A.-M. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74–89). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mol, A.-M. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mol, A.-M., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 2(4), 641–671.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Nespor, J. (2011). Devices and educational change. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 15–37.
Oliver, M. (2012). Learning with technology as coordinated sociomaterial practice: Digital literacies as a site of praxiological study. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning 2012, Maastricht NT. Online: http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/info/confpapers.html.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.
Somerville, M. (2012). Art, community, and knowledge flows. In T. Fenwick & L. Farrell (Eds.), Knowledge mobilization and educational research. London: Routledge.
Somerville, M. (2013). Water in a dry land: Place learning through art and story. New York: Routledge.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Trowler, P. (2012). Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: Conceptual groundwork. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and territories in the 21st century (pp. 5–29). London: Routledge.
Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century (pp. 5–29). London: Routledge.
Verran, H. (2007). Metaphysics and learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 31–39.
Villegas, M., Neugebauer, S. R., & Venegas, K. R. (Eds.). (2008). Indigenous knowledge and education sites of struggle, strength, and survivance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Wright, S., & Parchoma, G. (2011). Technologies for learning? An actor-network theory critique of ‘affordances’ in research on mobile learning. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 247–258.
Young, M. (2009). Education, globalization and the ‘voice of knowledge’. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 193–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R. Networks of knowledge, matters of learning, and criticality in higher education. High Educ 67, 35–50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9639-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9639-3