Skip to main content
Log in

Complementary effect of patient volume and quality of care on hospital cost efficiency

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the direct effect of an increase in patient volume in a hospital and the complementary effect of quality of care on the cost efficiency of U.S. hospitals in terms of patient volume. The simultaneous equation model with three-stage least squares is used to measure the direct effect of patient volume and the complementary effect of quality of care and volume. Cost efficiency is measured with a data envelopment analysis method. Patient volume has a U-shaped relationship with hospital cost efficiency and an inverted U-shaped relationship with quality of care. Quality of care functions as a moderator for the relationship between patient volume and efficiency. This paper addresses the economically important question of the relationship of volume with quality of care and hospital cost efficiency. The three-stage least square simultaneous equation model captures the simultaneous effects of patient volume on hospital quality of care and cost efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC (1987) The Volume-Outcome Relationship: Practice-Makes-Perfect or Selective-Referral Patters? Health Services Research 22(2):157–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Theokary C, Ren J (2011) An empirical study of the relations between hospital volume, teaching status and service quality. Production and Operations Management 20(3):303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carr W, Feldstein P (1967) The relationship of cost to hospital size. Inq 4:45–65

    Google Scholar 

  4. Preyra C, Pink G (2006) Scale and scope efficiencies through hospital consolidations. Journal of Health Economics 25(6):1049–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Porter M, Teisberg E (2004) redefining competition in health care. Harvard Business Review 82(6):65–76

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saxena SB, Sharma A, Wong A (2013) Succeeding in hospital & health systems M&A – Why so many deals have failed, and how to succeed in the future. Strategy&, http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/Strategyand_Succeeding-in-Hospital-and-Health-Systems-MA.pdf

  7. Kaplan R, Porter M (2011) How to solve the cost crisis in the health care. Harvard Bus Rev 89:47–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cylus J, Dickensheets B (2007) Hospital multifactor productivity: a presentation and analysis of two methodologies. Health Care Financ R 29(2):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris J (1977) The internal organization of hospitals: some economic implications. Bell J of Econ 8:467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Menon NM, Lee B, Eldenburg L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research 11(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tucker A, Edmondson A (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review 45(2):55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chirikos T, Sear A (2000) Measuring hospital inefficiency: a comparison of two approaches. Health Ser Res 34:1389–1408

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein S, Ward P, Keong Leong G, Butler T (2002) The effect of location, strategy, and operations technology on hospital performance. Journal of Operations Management 20:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosko M, Mutter R (2008) Stochastic frontier analysis of hospital inefficiency: a review of empirical issues and an assessment of robustness. Medical Care Research and Review 65:131–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Romano P, Mutter R (2004) The evolving science of quality measures for hospitals: implications for studies of competition and consolidation. Int J Health Care Finance & Econ 4:131–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Donabedian A (2003) Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press, Vol I, 13–15

  17. Bernet P, Rosko M, Valdmanis V (2008) The relationship between hospital cost inefficiency and debt ratings. Journal of Health Care Finance 34(4):66–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosko M (2001) cost efficiency of us hospitals: a stochastic frontier approach. Health Economics 10:539–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor D, Whellan D, Sloan F (1999) Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for medicare beneficiaries. The New England Journal of Medicine 340:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S (2006) Productivity changes in Taiwanese hospitals and the national health insurance. Service Industries Journal 26(4):459–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Linna M, Hakkinen U (2006) reimbursing for the costs of teaching and research in finnish hospitals: a stochastic frontier analysis. Int J Health Care Finance & Econ 6(l):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell P, Shortell S (1997) Adverse outcomes and variations in organization of care delivery. Medical Care 35(11):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nayar P, Ozcan Y (2008) data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality. Journal of Medical Systems 32:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosko M, Mutter R (2011) What have we learned from the application of stochastic frontier analysis to us hospitals? Medical Care Research and Review 68(1):75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hollingsworth B (2008) the measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics 17(10):1107–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9):1078–1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Neill L, Rauner M, Heidenberger K, Kraus M (2008) a cross-national comparison and taxonomy of dea-based hospital efficiency studies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 42(3):158–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banker R, Morey R (1986) use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 32(12):1613–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hollingsworth B, Smith P (2003) Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics Letters 10(11):733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Korhonen P, Syrjanen M (2004) resource allocation based on efficiency analysis. Management Science 50(8):1134–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Banker R, Conrad R, Strauss R (1986) A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: an illustrative study of hospital production. Management Science 32(1):30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vitaliano D, Toren M (1996) Hospital cost and efficiency in a regime of stringent regulation. Eastern Econ J 22:161–173

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fichtenbaum R (1983) variations in hospital cost by types of ownership. Journal of Behavioral Economics 12(2):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosko M (2004) Performance of U.S. Teaching Hospitals: A Panel Analysis of Cost Inefficiency. Health Care Management Science 7(16):7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mutter RL, Rosko MD, Wong HS (2008) Measuring hospital inefficiency: The effects of controlling for quality and patient burden of illness. Health Services Research 43(6):1992–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bowerman B, O’Connell R, Murphree E (2014) Business statistics in practice, 7th edn. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  38. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11):1359–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ray G, Xue L, Barney JB (2013) Impact of information technology capital on firm scope and performance: the role of asset characteristics. Academy of Management Journal 56(4):1125–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pisano G, Bohmer R, Edmondson A (2001) organizational differences in rates of learning: evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science 47(6):752–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shortell S, O’Brien J, Carman J, Foster R, Hughes E, Boerstler H, O’Connor E (1995) Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation. Health Services Research 30(2):377–401

    Google Scholar 

  42. Becker E, Sloan F (1985) Hospital ownership and preference. Economic Inquiry 23:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hansmann H (1998) Ownership of the Firm. J Law Econ Organ 4(2):267–304

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sloan F, Picone G, Taylor D, Chou S (2001) Hospital ownership and cost and quality of care: is there a dime's worth of difference? Journal of Health Economics 20(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hansmann H (1996) The ownership of enterprise. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Burgess JF, Wilson PW (1996) hospital ownership and technical inefficiency. Management Science 42:110–123. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Grosskopf S, Margaritis D, Valdmanis V (2004) competitive effects on teaching hospitals. European Journal of Operational Research 154(2):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Neely S, McInturff W (1998) What Americans say about the nation’s medical schools and teaching hospitals. Report on public opinion research. Part II, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mesquita LF, Brush TH (2008) Untangling safeguard and production coordination effects in long-term buyer-supplier relationships. Academy of Management Journal 51:785–807

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hughes R, Hunt S, Luft H (1987) effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Medical Care 25(6):489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hewitt M, Petitti D (2001) Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of cancer care. National Academies Press (US), Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ski CF, King-Shier KM, Thompson DR (2014) Gender, socioeconomic and ethnic/racial disparities in cardiovascular disease: a time for change. International Journal of Cardiology 170(3):255–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Curry L, Cherlin EJ, Wang Y, Webster TR, Drye EE, Normand ST, Krumholz HM (2010) Variation in hospital mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology 106(8):1108–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and appreciate the constructive comments from editors and anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Hoon Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J.H., Park, I., Jung, I. et al. Complementary effect of patient volume and quality of care on hospital cost efficiency. Health Care Manag Sci 20, 221–231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-015-9348-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-015-9348-9

Keywords

Navigation