Abstract
This paper examines how middle managers in the long term care sector use the discourse of professionalism to create ‘appropriate’ work conduct of care workers. Using Watson’s concept of professional talk, we study how managers in their daily work talk about professionalism of vocationally skilled care workers. Based on observations and recordings of mundane conversations by middle managers, we found four different professional talks that co-exist: (1) appropriate looks and conduct, (2) reflectivity about personal values and ‘good’ care, (3) methodical work methods, (4) competencies. Jointly, these professional talks constitute an important discursive resource for middle managers to facilitate change on the work floor. Change involves the reconfiguration of care work and different managerial-worker relations. Middle managers use professional talks in both enabling and disenabling ways vis-à-vis care workers. Based on these findings, we suggest a more nuanced portrayal of the relationship between managers and professionals. Rather than being based on an intrinsic opposition, i.e. ‘managers versus professionals’, this relationship is flexibly reconstructed via professional talk.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Professionalism in everyday speech can for example refer to ‘paid services’ as opposed to doing something for pleasure, but is also used by people to imply that they are competent in their occupation or that they run someone else’s enterprise rather than one’s own [59].
In a very insightful article on varieties of discourse, [3] make a distinction between different forms of discourses, varying from a micro textual analysis to grand Discourses on a macro level that constitute the social world. Our perspective on discourse can be placed in the middle range theories of discourse, which assume that there is a loose connection between talk and the framing of action.
In Dutch: Regionale Opleidingscentra (ROC’s).
Only the very first day of observations was not recorded due to the absence of an appropriate recording device.
As opposed to hospital settings, in the Dutch long term care sector the use of uniforms is less common. Especially in small-scale living facilities, formal attire of care workers is rare since the goal of these domestic living arrangements is to let clients live their life as ‘normally’ as possible.
The terminology differs slightly per sector. In the disability sector, the term ‘Support Plan’ is used, whereas in the elderly sector the term ‘Care Living Plan’ is more common, see [54]. Notwithstanding these differences, the Plans are based on the same principles of self-determination and client choice.
References
Actiz. (2011). Vakbekwaam mensenwerk. Anders werken in de langdurige zorg, nieuwe professionaliteit. Utrecht: Actiz.
Alvesson, M. (1994). Talking in organizations: Managing identity and impressions in an advertising agency. Organization Studies, 15(4), 535–563.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.
Arman, R., Dellve, L., Wikström, E., & Törnström, L. (2009). What health care managers do: Applying Mintzberg’s structured observation method. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(6), 718–729.
Austin, J. L. (1978). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bekkers, V., et al. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in the public sector. Linking capacity and leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Birken, S. A., Lee, S.-Y. D., Weiner, B. J., Chin, M. H., & Schaefer, C. T. (2013). Improving the effectiveness of health care innovation implementation: Middle managers as change agents. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(1), 29–45.
Birken, S. A., Lee, S.-Y. D. & Weiner B. J. (2012). Uncovering middle managers’ role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implementation Science, 7(28). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-28.
Brint, S. G. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brunsson, N. (1990). Deciding for responsibility and legitimation: Alternative interpretations of organizational decision-making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1/2), 47–59.
Currie, G. (2000). The role of middle managers in strategic change in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 20(1), 17–22.
Czarniawska, B. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmö: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
Davies, S. (2006). Health services management education: Why and what? Journal of Health, Organization and Management, 20(4), 325–334.
Dopson, S., & Fitzgerald, L. (2006). The role of the middle manager in the implementation of evidence-based health care. Journal of Nursing Management, 14, 43–51.
Elshout, P. (2006). Middenmanagement: Functie in ontwikkeling. Tilburg: University of Tilburg.
Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 406–422.
Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and New Public Management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247–266.
Evetts, J. (2006). Short note: The sociology of professional groups. Current Sociology, 54, 133–143.
Evetts, J. (2003). The construction of professionalism in new and existing occupational contexts: Promoting and facilitating occupational change. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(4), 22–35.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. Social Review, 47(2), 280–307.
Gleeson, D., & Knights, D. (2006). Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in ‘troubled’ times. Sociology, 40(2), 277–295.
Goffman, E. (1991, reprint). Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. London: Penguin Books (1961).
Goffman, E. (1990, reprint). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books (1959).
Grey, C. (1998). On being a professional in a “big six” firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5/6), 569–587.
Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.
Grit, K., & Bont, A. (2010). Tailor-made finance care versus tailor-made care. Can the state strengthen consumer choice in healthcare by reforming the financial structure of long-term care? Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(2), 79–83.
Hussein, S., & Manthorpe, J. (2005). An international review of the long-term care workforce. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 17(4), 75–94.
Iedema, R., Degeling, P., Braithwaite, J., & White, L. (2003). ‘It’s an interesting conversation I’m hearing’: The doctor as manager. Organization Studies, 25(1), 15–33.
Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, IGZ, (2007). Verantwoorde zorg voor gehandicapten onder druk. Den Haag: IGZ.
Kipping, M. (2011). Hollow from the start? Image professionalism in management consulting. Current Sociology, 59(4), 530–550.
Kotter, J. P. (1986). The general managers. New York: The Free Press.
Lilleker, D. G., & Negrine, R. (2002). Professionalization: Of what? Since when? By whom? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(4), 98–103.
Mesman, J. (2008). Uncertainty in medical innovation: Experienced pioneers in neonatal care. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBA’s. A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Minztberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row. Reprinted by Prentice-Hall (1980).
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 1–22). Durham: Duke University Press.
Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I. (2011). Introduction: Professions and organizations—A conceptual framework. Current Sociology, 59(4), 389–405.
Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1349–1371.
Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism: present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration and Society, 39, 761–785.
Noordegraaf, M. (2000). Attention! Work and behavior of public managers amidst ambiguity. Delft: Eburon.
Noordegraaf, M., & Van der Meulen, M. (2008). Professional power play: Organizing management in health care. Public Administration, 86(4), 1055–1069.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.
Oldenhof, L. (2012). De middenmanager: Sleutelfiguur bij transities in de langdurige zorg. Studie voor de Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg. Den Haag: RVZ.
Oldenhof, L., & Putters, K. (2011). Daily practices of operational healthcare managers: Dealing with tensions between different values. Medische Antropologie, 23(1), 81–101.
Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg, RVZ. (2009). Dilemma’s van verpleegkundigen en verzorgenden. Den Haag: Centrum voor Ethiek en Gezondheid.
Stoopendaal, A. (2008). Zorg met afstand. Betrokken bestuur in grootschalige zorginstellingen. Rotterdam: Van Gorcum.
Stone, R., & Harahan, M. F. (2009). Improving the long term care workforce serving older adults. Health Affairs, 29(1), 109–115.
Thomas, P., & Hewitt, J. (2011). Managerial organization and professional autonomy: A discourse-based conceptualization. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1373–1393.
Van Loon, E., & Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2012). Framing reflexivity in quality improvement devices in the care for older people. Health Care Analysis, 20(2), 119–138.
Van Loon, J., & van Hove, G. (2001). Emancipation and self-determination of people with learning disabilities and down-sizing institutional care. Disability & Society, 16(2), 233–254.
Von Wright, G. H. (1972). The varieties of goodness. London & New York: Routledge and the Humanities Press.
Waring, J., & Currie, G. (2009). Managing expert knowledge: Organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. Organization Studies, 30(07), 755–778.
Waring, J. (2007). Adaptive regulation or governmentality: Patient safety and changing regulation of medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 163–179.
Watson, T. (2003). Professions and professionalism. Should we jump off the bandwagon, better to study where it is going? International Studies of Management and Organization, 32(2), 93–105.
Watson, T. J. (1994). In search of management. London: Routledge.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.
Willems, D., & Pols J. (2010). Goodness! The empirical turn in health care ethics. Medische Antropologie, 22(1), 161–170.
Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life. London: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oldenhof, L., Stoopendaal, A. & Putters, K. Professional Talk: How Middle Managers Frame Care Workers as Professionals. Health Care Anal 24, 47–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-013-0269-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-013-0269-9