Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy, Medicine and Healthcare: Insights from the Italian Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To contribute to our understanding of the relationship between philosophical ideas and medical and healthcare models. A diachronic analysis is put in place in order to evaluate, from an innovative perspective, the influence over the centuries on medical and healthcare models of two philosophical concepts, particularly relevant for health: how Man perceives his identity and how he relates to Nature. Five epochs are identified—the Archaic Age, Classical Antiquity, the Middle Ages, the Modern Age, the ‘Postmodern’ Era—which can be seen, à la Foucault, as ‘fragments between philosophical fractures’. From a historical background perspective, up to the early 1900s progress in medical and healthcare models has moved on a par with the evolution of philosophical debate. Following the Second World War, the Health Service started a series of reforms, provoked by anti-positivistic philosophical transformations. The three main reforms carried out however failed and the medical establishment remained anchored to a mechanical, reductionist approach, perfectly in line with the bureaucratic stance of the administrators. In this context, future scenarios are delineated and an anthropo-ecological model is proposed to re-align philosophy, medicine and health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Glouberman shows how broad philosophical issues affect the way we conceive of health and illness, and how this has a profound impact on all areas of the health field, from government policies to how we look at our own health. “Our ideas about (1) order and disorder, (2) how we relate to the natural world, (3) how we know who we are, are so pervasive that it is hard for us to recognise how much they influence our thinking in general and about health and illness in particular. As they have changed dramatically over time to become richer and more complex, many of our ideas about health have followed” [24, p. 3]. According to Engels, philosophical ideas have a direct bearing on what are considered the proper boundaries of professional responsibility as well as the attitudes towards patients [17].

  2. [6, p. 24].

  3. [20].

  4. [22, p. 202].

  5. [20, p. 19].

  6. [37, p. 102].

  7. In this case beneficial treatment consisted of forcing the intruder out, by making the body inhospitable for the spirit through violence, torture and fasting, or by expelling the evil spirit through potions provoking vomit, or by removing the spirit by means of a hole made in the cranium.

  8. [28], passim.

  9. [37, pp. 2–3].

  10. [20, pp. 82–83].

  11. [24, p. 4].

  12. [21, p. 17].

  13. [47, p. 9].

  14. [48, Vol. I], passim.

  15. [45], passim.

  16. [9, p. 30].

  17. [33].

  18. [19], passim.

  19. [29], passim.

  20. [47, pp. 331–348].

  21. The experimental methodology extrapolates a body from its natural environment and puts it in an artificial controlled environment where tests are carried out.

  22. [25], passim.

  23. [28].

  24. [7, pp. 6–7].

  25. [24].

  26. [23], passim.

  27. [35, p. 6].

  28. [10, p. 15].

  29. [28].

  30. [18, p. 112].

  31. [35, p. 11].

  32. [18, p. 112].

  33. [14, pp. 44–45].

  34. [42].

  35. [12].

  36. Ronzani writes, with reference to the medieval hospital: “Infirmaries were usually located in humid and dark rooms, without other facilities apart from some primitive latrines. Only poor people were hospitalized, since affluent families used to cure their sick at home. In each room there were patients with clinical, surgical or infectious diseases: two, three or even four persons per bed. Quite rarely there was a separate room for acutely ill patients. Therefore, quite often patients with slight diseases, became affected by fatal infections after hospitalization. The mortality rate was very high, mainly among puerperants and the wounded. All services, from the more intimate to the more insalubrious, were provided within the same room. Sometimes corpses remained for a long time in the beds, close to other patients, before removal” [46, p. 22].

  37. [49, p.12].

  38. [31, pp. 164–165].

  39. [8].

  40. [41].

  41. [16].

  42. [30, p. 201].

  43. [34].

  44. [15, p. 99].

  45. [14].

  46. [26, p. 74].

  47. [27].

  48. [14].

  49. [32], passim.

  50. [40].

  51. [1, 2].

  52. [3].

  53. [11].

  54. [5].

  55. The market mechanism stimulates consumption in that it regulates transactions on the basis not of the use value—in other words the advantage obtainable in terms of health—but rather of the exchange value, namely the encounter between demand and supply. In addition, supply, by virtue of the specific peculiarity of the sector, is able to condition demand.

  56. It is interesting to note that at the same time the industry pushes toward the increase of parameters which define the legal thresholds for polluting factors.

  57. We refer not only to plastic surgery, but also to the reduction of sleep needs, the enhancement of memory or of physical strength.

  58. [50, pp. 36–37].

  59. [13, p. 220].

  60. [44, p. 183].

  61. [36].

  62. [39].

  63. This approach has been taken up by Mintzberg in his latest book, where “to manage” is defined “not just to walk a tightrope, but to move through a multidimensional space on all kinds of tightropes” (p. 192). An interesting quotation by Scott Fitzgerald is then reported (p. 193): “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function” [38, pp. 192–193].

  64. Mintzberg, ibidem.

  65. [3, pp. 22–32].

  66. Mintzberg, ibidem.

  67. [38, p. 191].

  68. [38, p. 186].

  69. “Many organizations, in health care and beyond, are just too big” [38, p. 172].

  70. As Mintzberg observes. “To manage nursing in a hospital seems natural enough. But what about managing nursing in two hospitals, a few miles apart, that have been magically merged on a sheet of paper?” [38, p. 165].

  71. [38, p. 192].

  72. [4].

Abbreviations

EBM:

Evidence based medicine

ICT:

Information and communication technologies

LHU:

Local health units

MBO:

Management by objectives

References

  1. Adinolfi, P. (2008). L’assetto organizzativo delle aziende sanitarie: Evoluzione e prospettive future. In R. Mele & M. Triassi (Eds.), Manuale di management e gestione delle aziende sanitarie (pp. 271–313). Padova: Cedam.

  2. Adinolfi, P. (2008). La gestione delle risorse umane nelle aziende sanitarie. In R. Mele & M. Triassi (Eds.), Manuale di management e gestione delle aziende sanitarie (pp. 315–342). Padova: Cedam.

  3. Adinolfi, P. (2005). Il mito dell’azienda. L’innovazione gestionale e organizzativa nelle amministrazioni pubbliche (pp. 22–32). Milano: McGraw Hill.

  4. Adinolfi, P. (forthcoming). Barriers to reforming health care: The case of Italy. Health Care Analysis.

  5. Adinolfi, P., & Mercurio, R. (2005). La clinical governance, possibile soluzione ai fabbisogni di integrazione nelle aziende sanitarie. Mecosan, 14(53), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alfieri, R. (2007). Le idee che nuocciono alla sanità e alla salute. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aristotele. (1973). Opere (Vol. IX). Bari: Laterza.

  8. Bacon, F.(1968). Cogitata et Visa. In J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, & D. D. Heath (1857), The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. III), New York: Garret Press, pp. 1859–1864.

  9. Barni, T. (2007). Magna Grecia VI sec. A.C.: dalla sapienza all’indagine, dalla rivelazione alle congetture. La medicina si fa scienza, Hematology Meeting Report, 1(6), pp. 27–34.

  10. Bonani, V. (2011). Il corpo e il cosmo. De antiquitate & dignitate Scholae Salernitanae, in Il corpo e il cosmo Salerno: Ordine dei Medici Chirurghi e degli Odontoiatri della provincia di Salerno.

  11. Cavicchi, I. (2005). Sanità. Un libro bianco per discutere. Bari: Dedalo.

  12. Collière, M. F. (1992). Aiutare a vivere. Dal sapere delle donne all’assistenza infermieristica. Milano: Sorbona.

  13. Cosmacini, G. (1994). Storia della medicina e della sanità nell’Italia contemporanea. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cosmacini, G. (2005). Storia della medicina e della sanità in Italia. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  15. David, H. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Descartes, R. (1960). L’Homme. In C. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.), Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. IX), 11 volumes, revised by Rochot, B. & Costabe, P., Paris: CNRS.

  17. Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fielding, H. G. (1913). An introduction to the history of medicine (IV ed., p. 112). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Foucault, M. (1972). Naissance de la clinique. une archéologie du renard médical. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  20. Frazer, J. (1922). The golden bough. A study in magic and religion (III ed., p. 45). New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garrison, F. H. (1913). An introduction to the history of medicine, IV ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.

  22. Giannantoni, G. (Ed.). (1969). I presocratici, (Vol. I). Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gilson, E. (2009). Lo spirito della filosofia medievale. Brescia: Morcelliana.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glouberman, S. (2005). Changing conceptions of health and illness: Three philosophical ideas and health, Workshop: Shaping the future of home care. Ontario: Sutton place, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gourevitch, D. (2001). I giovani pazienti di Galeno. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gourevitch, D. (Ed.). (1992). Maladie et maladies, histoire et conceptualisation (Mélanges en honneur de Mirko Gremek). Genève: Librairie Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Granshaw, L., & Porter, R. (Eds.). (1989). The hospital in history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grmek, M. D. (2007). Storia del pensiero medico occidentale. Antichità e medioevo, Roma: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jacques, J. (1994). Ippocrate. Torino: Sei.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kant, I. (1995). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  31. La Cava, A. F. (1946). Liber Regular S. Spiritus Milan: Hoepli.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lyotard, J. F. (2002). La condizione postmoderna. Rapporto sul sapere, Milano: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lloyd, G. (1979). Magic, reason and experience (pp. 35–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Locke, J. (2011). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide Library.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Löwith, K. (2000). Dio, uomo e mondo nella metafisica da Cartesio a Nietzsche. Roma: Donzelli.

    Google Scholar 

  36. March, J. C., & Cohen, M. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity (p. 3). Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Meunier, L. (1924). Histoire de la médecine depuis ses origines jusqu’ à nos jours. Paris: E. Le François.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing. San Francisco: Financial Times Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morin, E. (2001). La réforme de la pensée suppose une réforme de l’être. Transversales. Science & Culture, 71, 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Newton, I. (1997). Principi matematici della filosofia naturale. Torino: Utet.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pazzini, A. (1947). Storia della medicina (Vol. II). Milano: Società Editrice Libraria.

  43. Pettersen, T. (2001). The ethics of care: Normative structures and empirical implications. Health Care Analysis, 19(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Romains, J. (1923). Knock, or Le Triumphe de la Médecine. In Banfort, I. (2003). The body in the library. A literary anthology of modern medicine. London: Verso.

  45. Ruggiu, L. (2007). Aristotele. La Fisica, Milano: Mimesi.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ronzani, E. (1942). Trattato di igiene e tecnica ospedaliera. Milano: Garzanti.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sarton, G. (1952). A history of science. Ancient Science through the Golden Age of Greece. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thorndike, L. (1923). A history of magic and experimental science (Vol. VIII). New York: Columbia University Press.

  49. Von Engelhardt, D. (2000). Il sollievo della sofferenza nella storia della medicina. In E. Sgreccia (Ed.), Storia della medicina e storia dell’etica medica verso il terzo millennio. Rubettino: Catanzaro.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Žižek, S. (2008). In defense of lost causes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Adinolfi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adinolfi, P. Philosophy, Medicine and Healthcare: Insights from the Italian Experience. Health Care Anal 22, 223–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-012-0208-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-012-0208-1

Keywords

Navigation