Date: 05 Aug 2008
Best Interests and Pragmatism
- Sheelagh McGuinness
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this article I will show that ‘best interests’ is a concept that fits nicely with many of the features of pragmatism—Holm and Edgar’s rejection of the principle in favour of pragmatism it will be suggested is misplaced. ‘Best interests’ as a principle may be considered an embodiment of the ideals of pragmatic adjudication. The paper starts by briefly introducing the concept of ‘best interests’ and theories of judicial and legal ‘pragmatism’. This article will examine the role of the rational decision-maker in medical law and argue that this role is limited. The paper concludes by suggesting how we view the relationship between ‘best interests’ and ‘pragmatism’.
Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland [House Of Lords]. (1993). AC 789.
An NHS Trust v. A. (2005). EWCA Civ 1145.
Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and childhood. New York: Routledge.
Arras, J. D. (2001). Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics. Theoretical Medicine, 22, 69–85.CrossRef
Brazier, M. (2005). An intractable dispute: When parents and professionals disagree. Medical Law Review, 13, 412–418.CrossRef
Brazier, M. (1997). Hard cases. Journal of Medical Ethics, 23, 343.CrossRef
Buck v Bell 274 US 200 (1927).
Dworkin, R. (1975). Hard cases. Harvard Law Review, 88, 1057–1107.CrossRef
Dworkin, R. (2006). Justice in robes. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Frank, J. (1949). Law and the modern mind. London: Stevens.
Grey, T. C. (1996). Freestanding legal pragmatism. Cardozo Law Review, 18, 21–42.
Holm, S. & Edgar, A. (2008). Best interest—a philosophical critique. Health Care Analysis, 16(3). doi:10.1007/s10728-008-0092-x.
Holmes, O. W. (1931). Codes and the arrangement of the law. Harvard Law Review, 44, 725–737.
In Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation) (2001). Fam 15.
Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt (2004). EWHC 2247 (Fam).
Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt (2005). EWCA Civ 1181.
Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt (2005). EWHC 117.
Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt (2005). EWHC 693.
Posner, R. A. (1996). Pragmatic adjudication. Cardozo Law Review, 18, 1–20.
Posner, R. A. (2001). Breaking the deadlock: The 2000 election, the constitution, and the courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) (1993). Fam. 95.
Re Wyatt (2006). EWHC 319.
Regina (Burke) v General Medical Council (Official Solicitor and others intervening) (2005). EWCA Civ 1003.
Rorty, R. (2003). Consequences of pragmatism. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, S. J. (1998). A child’s best interests: A commentary on ‘jurisprudential and ethical perspectives on the best interests of children’ by Keith Walker. Interchange, 29, 309–316.CrossRef
Walker, K. (1998). ‘Jurisprudential and ethical perspectives on the best interests of children’. Interchange, 29, 287–308.CrossRef
- Best Interests and Pragmatism
Health Care Analysis
Volume 16, Issue 3 , pp 208-218
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Best interests
- Legal pragmatism
- Philosophical pragmatism
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M20 4LZ, UK