Abstract
I will focus on Dworkin’s use of idealisation in his “Prudent Insurance” Ideal for healthcare. Dworkin identifies problems with the circumstances under which people make their insurance decisions in the current United States healthcare system and he sees these as being the cause of strange resource allocation outcomes. He therefore imagines idealising away these prima facie unjust circumstances to develop a hypothetical market in which people are able to make better decisions (Section “Idealisation of Circumstance”). I will identify two further idealisations that Dworkin relies on in his theory. The first is to idealise people to be perfectly prudent (Section “Idealisation of Prudence”), which I consider to be justifiable, but difficult to actually apply in practise. The second is to idealise people to be perfectly self-interested (Section “Idealisation to Self-interest”). I do not see this as a justifiable idealization since it ignores principles of altruism and citizenship, which would seem to be deeply relevant to a theory of justice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
O’Neill, O. (1987). Abstraction, Idealisation and Ideology in Ethics. In J. D. G. Evans (Ed.), Moral philosophy and contemporary problems (pp. 55–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.
Tsuchiya, A. (1999). Age-related preferences and age weighting health benefits. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 267–276.
Wolff, J. (2002). Railway safety and the ethics of the tolerability of risk. UK: Railway Safety Research Centre.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Stephen John for his help during the preparation of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clackson, S. Ronald Dworkin’s “Prudent Insurance” Ideal for Healthcare: Idealisations of Circumstance, Prudence and Self-interest. Health Care Anal 16, 31–38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0052-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0052-x