Abstract
Trust is a critical component in effective collaboration, decision-making and negotiation. The goal of effective team leaders should be to send signals and messages that increase trust. We attempt to determine if signals can vary perceptions of trustworthiness and if nonverbal behaviors, such as the voice, contain indicators of trust. In order to investigate the relationship between trust and vocal dynamics, this article presents a study that explores how the voice, measured unobtrusively, reflects a person’s current level of perceived trust. We used an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA) to maximize consistency and control in questioning, timing, and interviewer nonverbal behavior, thus eliminating potential confounds that may be introduced due to interaction adaptation. Participants (\(\text{ N}=88\)) completed a face-to-face interview with the ECA and reported their perceptions of the ECA’s trustworthiness. The results of the study revealed that vocal pitch was inversely related to perceived trust, but temporally variant; vocal pitch early in the interview reflected trust. The ECA was perceived as more trustworthy when smiling. While the results of this research suggest a relationship between vocal pitch and perceived levels of trust, more work needs to be done to clarify the causal relationship. Similarly, additional study needs to be done in order to integrate additional behavioral measurements that account for variation across diverse situations, people, and cultures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacharach M, Gambetta D (1997) Trust in signs. In: Cook KS (ed) Trust in society. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 148–184
Bachorowski JA, Owren MJ (1995) Vocal expression of emotion: acoustic properties of speech are associated with emotional intensity and context. Psychol Sci 6(4):219–224
Boersma P (2002) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int 5(9/10):341–345
Bollen K (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley-Interscience
Burgoon JK, Stern LA, Dillman L (2007) Interpersonal adaptation: dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cappella JN (1997) Behavioral and judged coordination in adult informal social interactions: vocal and kinesic indicators. J Pers Soc Psychol 72(1):119–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.119
Dyer NG, Hanges PJ, Hall RJ (2005) Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadersh Q 16(1):149–167
Fogg BJ, Nass C (1997) Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 46(5):551–561
Hall B, Henningsen DD (2008) Social facilitation and human-computer interaction. Comput Hum Behav 24(6):2965–2971. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.003
Hardin R (2002) Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Hess U, Philippot P, Blairy S (1999) Mimicry: facts and fiction. In: Philippot P, Feldman RS, Coats EJ (eds) The social context of nonverbal behavior, studies in emotion and social interaction. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, France, pp 13–241
Juslin PN, Laukka P (2003) Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code? Psychol Bull 129(5):770–814
Juslin PN, Scherer KR (2005) Vocal expression of affect. The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research, pp 65–135
Lee E (2008) Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: the moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender. Int J Human-Comput Stud 66(11):789–800
Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–734
McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38(1):24–59. doi:10.2307/256727
Moon Y, Nass C (1996) How “real” are computer personalities? Commun Res 23(6):651–674
Moon Y, Nass C (1998) Are computers scapegoats? attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 49(1):79–94
Muthén BO (1991) Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. J Educ Meas 28(4):338–354
Muthén BO (1994) Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociol Methods Res 22(3):376
Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56(1):81–103
Nass C, Steuer J (1993) Voices, boxes, and sources of messages. Hum Commun Res 19(4):504–527
Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence. ACM, Boston, MA, pp 72–78
Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Dryer C (1995) Can computer personalities be human personalities? In: Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, Denver, CO, pp 228–229
Nass C, Moon Y, Morkes J, Kim E, Fogg BJ (1997) Computers are social actors: a review of current research. In: Human values and the design of computer technology, center for the study of language and information lecture notes. Cambridge University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 137–161
Niewiadomski R, Pelachaud C (2010) Affect expression in ECAs: application to politeness displays. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 68(11):851–871
Nunamaker Jr JF, Derrick DC, Elkins AC, Burgoon JK, Patton MW (2011) Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA) based kiosk for automated interviewing. J Manag Inf Syst 28(1):17–49
Ohanian R (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity Endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J Advert 19(3):39–52
Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychol Women Q 26(4):269–281
Qiu L, Benbasat I (2010) A study of demographic embodiments of product recommendation agents in electronic commerce. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 68(10):669–688
Rapson RL, Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT (1993) Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge
Reysen S (2005) Construction of new scale: the Reysen likability scale. Soc Behav Pers Int J 33(2):201–208
Ridgeway C (2009) Cultural beliefs and the gendering of social relations. In: Framed by gender: how gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p 248
Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by gender: how gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Riegelsberger J (2005) Trust in mediated interactions (Doctoral dissertation). University College London, London
Rummel RJ (1970) Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Rusman E (2011) How to inform trustworthiness assessments in virtual project teams (Doctoral dissertation). Open University in the Netherlands (CELSTEC), Heerlen, The Netherlands
Six F, Nooteboom B, Hoogendoorn A (2010) Actions that build interpersonal trust: a relational signaling perspective. Rev Soc Econ 68(3):285–315
Streeter LA, Krauss RM, Geller V, Olson C, Apple W (1977) Pitch changes during attempted deception. J Pers Soc Psychol 35(5):345–350
Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Titze IR, Martin DW (1998) Principles of voice production. Acoust Soc Am J 104:1148
Tzafrir S, Sanchez R, Tirosh-Unger K (2012) Social motives and trust: implications for joint gains in negotiations. Group Decis Negot 21(6):839–862
Van Vugt HCV, Bailenson JN, Hoorn JF, Konijn EA (2008) Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 17(2):1–27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elkins, A.C., Derrick, D.C. The Sound of Trust: Voice as a Measurement of Trust During Interactions with Embodied Conversational Agents. Group Decis Negot 22, 897–913 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9339-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9339-x