Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing a real-time Twitter-based system for resource dispatch in disaster management

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the possibility of utilizing VGI in disaster management. Effective cross-jurisdictional disaster management requires real-time information, which is not available from official sources. This paper identifies tweets from Twitter as a potential VGI data source and shows how to discover and utilize relevant tweets. The paper proposes research methods for real-time (or near real-time) tweets harvesting, live tweets saving in a distributed geodatabase, and real-time VGI data redistribution. The study implements a Web GIS application as a platform for geo-tagged tweets operation. The implemented Web GIS application includes a tweet discovery component, a geo-tagged tweets mapping component, as well as an online geo-tagged tweets operation and analysis component. The major tasks include how to record the harvested geo-tagged tweets in a geodatabase so that it can be redistributed in real-time. Based on tweets from Hurricane Joaquin in 2015 and a hypothetical mass evacuation, the case study evaluates the pros and cons of VGI for response in emergency management. Spatial–temporal analysis components are also demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., et al. (2013). #Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (2003). GI science, disasters, and emergency management. Transactions in GIS, 7(4), 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. (2005). Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the U.S. increasing? Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86(41), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Longueville, B., Smith, R. S., et al. (2009). OMG, from here, I can see the flames!: A use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks (pp. 73–80).

  • ESRI (2000). Challenges for GIS in emergency preparedness and response. ESRI white paper. Environmental Systems Research Institute.

  • Farris, M. T., Laska, S., et al. (2006). Successful application of GIS technology for Post-9/11 disaster management: overcoming challenges, capitalising on advantages. International Jounal Risk Assessment and Management, 6(4–6), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2013). National response framework: 54. Last Updated: 16 June 2016.

  • Gerber, B. J., Ducatman, A., et al. (2006). The potential for an uncontrolled mass evacuation of the DC metro area following a terrorist attack: A report of survey findings, West Virginia University: 81.

  • Goldblatt, R. B., & Weinisch, K. (2005). Evacuation planning, human factors, and traffic engineering: Developing systems for training and effective response. TR News, 238(May–June), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Alan Glennon, J. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, D., & Chen, C. (2014). Detecting non-personal and spam users on geo-tagged Twitter network. Transactions in GIS, 18(3), 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiruta, S., Yonezawa, T., et al. (2012). Detection, classification and visualization of place-triggered geotagged tweets. 2012: ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Levitz, J. & Bauerlein, V. (2015, October 5). Flooding from hurricane Joaquin shuts roads, schools in South Carolina. The Wall Street Journal.

  • Litman, T. (2006). Lessons from Katrina and Rita: What major disasters can teach transportation planners. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, A. M., Robinson, A. C., et al. (2011). Geo-twitter analytics: Applications in crisis management. In 25 th International Cartographic Conference, Paris, France.

  • Meit, M., Briggs, T., Kennedy, A., Sutton, J., & Feldman, J. (2007). Spontaneous evacuation following a dirty bomb or pandemic influenza: Highlights from a national survey of urban residents’ intended behavior. Policy Analysis Brief W Series no. 12.

  • Murthy, D., & Longwell, S. A. (2013). Twitter and disasters: The uses of twitter during the 2010 Pakistan floods. Information, Communication and Society, 16(6), 837–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2008). The Role of Transit in Emergency Evacuation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, A. (2015, November 2). Damage estimates rising from South Carolina’s ‘record-breaking’ storm. Insurance Journal West Magazine.

  • Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., et al. (2010). Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. In The 19 th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC.

  • Schiermeier, Q., & Alabaster, J. (2013). Fukushima leaks 18 times worse than first thought. Nature News,. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, E., de Albuquerque, J. P., et al. (2015). An advanced systematic literature review on spatiotemporal analyses of twitter data. Transactions in GIS, 19(6), 809–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, T., Stronkman, R., et al. (2012). Towards a realtime Twitter analysis during crises for operational crisis management. In 9 th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian Earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy, 2(2), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation (1416509). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhua Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Elmes, G., Ye, X. et al. Implementing a real-time Twitter-based system for resource dispatch in disaster management. GeoJournal 81, 863–873 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9745-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9745-8

Keywords

Navigation