Abstract
Scale is a debatable term in the humanities and social sciences. Conceptualized in human geography as spatial categories of thought, as the arenas where social processes occur, as bounded political-economic frames or as unhelpful binaries privileging either the local or the global, scale intersects a significant body of geographical research. The unfolding and intermeshing of topological connections that help to share moments and experiences are important sources for the differentiation, renewal and recalibration of individual identities, but they often work as co-components to scalar identifications. Engaging with the recent discussion on scale and the upsurge of emotional geographies, I seek to understand how people contextualize space through situated scalar perspectives and how they realign and recognize their identities through embodied emotions. The analysis of the empirical material, that comprises 23 focus groups with locally and universally-orientated civic organizations in Finland and England, focuses on the ways people use landscapes and communities as emotional signposts in their scalar identification. I argue that scale is a situated category, whose spectrum individuals negotiate through the performance of social discourses and cultural practices. In such negotiation, people scale their identity narratives to overcome or emphasize the distinctions between ‘us’ and ‘others’.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The selection of the regions is part of a project that studied the meaning of identity, how individual identities develop and how institutional identities are constructed in Finland and England at sub- and supranational levels.
These organizations thrive to influence the society, but they do this through established ways and not always through ‘contentious politics´ (Leitner et al. 2008). The majority of these civic organizations can be regarded as social movements that, citing DeLanda (2006, pp. 33–34), have given ‘rise to one or more organizations to stabilize it and perform specialized functions.’
I arranged the interviews with the groups by contacting the association’s key person. I requested them to form a group of four to six people. Six requests to English groups were unanswered. In South West England, I replaced Friends of the Earth with a similar Transition movement. One focus group in North Karelia consisted of two groups, hence 23 groups.
The first three Finnish regions resonate with the idea of three tribal territories – Finland, Tavastia (Häme) and Karelia – to which the Swedes arranged their high mediaeval rule. Ostrobothnia emerged as a significant territory after additional colonization in the fourteenth century. Southwest Finland and North Karelia are perhaps the two most contrasting regions in Finland. The former used to connect the entire Finnish ‘province’ to Swedish power through ecclesiastical, legal and educational institutions. The latter, annexed as part of Kexholm Karelia in 1617, remained more peripheral, unchanged and became a source of national reimagination for nineteenth century romantic artists (Meinander 2006). Päijät-Häme, a self-declared part of Helsinki-metropolitan region (Vainikka 2013), and North Ostrobothnia, the innovative centre of the Finnish north, both juggle between Eastern and Western Finnish traditions.
Numerous examples in the literature exemplify the specific or mystified nature of Cornwall. Many claim it to be a Celtic region (Deacon and Schwartz 2007; Laviolette 2012; Knight and Harrison 2013) whereas Devon - the county east of the millennia-old boundary river Tamar—often connotes quintessential and timeless Englishness, especially, in the works of leading English local historian, Hoskins (1985).
The research focuses on Finland and England, partly because of the researcher’s ability to conduct all stages of the research in both countries. More importantly, citizens in these countries have fairly strong national imaginaries and sense of distinctiveness, especially as their contrary ‘scalar legacies’, as imperial or dependent entities, have cluttered salient regionalism. For a reasonable comparison, it could also be argued that their relations to Europe are fairly noncentral as they are positioned, roughly speaking, between ‘the west’ and Europe or Europe and ‘the east’.
The participants were often the core members of the local groups, white and mainly middle class. They did not receive compensation for attendance. There is a slight overrepresentation of white-collar occupations in the material, especially in the universally-orientated groups. In relation to age, the Finnish sample with 66 participants (30 W/36 M) is representative of the wider populations – the average age of the Finnish participants was 47. The English sample with 28 participants (17 W/11 M) is older than the wider population with an average age of 59.
All names are pseudonyms.
Many English counties, Devon included, have mimicked the Cornish St. Piran’s flag. Attitudes towards the Devon flag are convoluted as the born-and-bred Devonians resent it and the more recently moved state that people have ‘welcomed it’ or are unaware of it. In Cornwall, the use of the St. Piran can become ‘inflammatory’. While the Cornish use it frequently, incomers can find it against their sense of Englishness. No regional flags exist in Finland, but people fly their provincial pennants. Some of them are based on the sixteenth century coats of arms, whose symbolic value was accentuated in the national romanticism era. Some more recently invented symbols do not hold similar emotional status.
References
Adey, P. (2008). Airports, mobility and the calculative architecture of affective control. Geoforum, 39(1), 438–451.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Allen, J. (2011). Topological twists: Power’s shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1(3), 283–298.
Anderson, B. (2006). Becoming and being hopeful: Towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(5), 733–752.
Anderson, J., Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2010). Positioning place: Polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 589–604.
Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10.
Antonsich, M. (2010a). Searching for belonging? An analytical framework. Geography Compass, 4(6), 644–659.
Antonsich, M. (2010b). Meanings of place and aspects of the self: An interdisciplinary and empirical account. GeoJournal, 75(1), 119–132.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boland, P. (2010). Sonic geography, place and race in the formation of local identity: Liverpool and Scousers. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92(1), 1–22.
Bondi, L. (2005). Making connections and thinking through emotions: Between geography and psychotherapy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 433–448.
Bondi, L., Davidson, J., & Smith, M. (2005). Introduction: Geography’s ‘emotional turn’. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.), Emotional geographies (pp. 1–16). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bosco, F. J. (2006). The Madres de Plaza de Mayo and three decades of human rights’ activism: Embeddedness, emotions, and social movements. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 342–365.
Bosco, F. J., & Herman, T. (2007). Focus groups as collaborative research performances. In D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 193–207). London: Sage.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.
Bunnell, T., Yea, S., Peake, L., Skelton, T., & Smith, M. (2012). Geographies of friendships. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 490–507.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
Buttimer, A. (2010). Humboldt, Granö and Geo-poetics of the Altai. Fennia, 188(2), 11–36.
Chettiparamb, A. (2013). Fractal spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 680–692.
Christou, A., & King, R. (2010). Imagining ‘home’: Diasporic landscapes of the Greek-German second generation. Geoforum, 41(4), 638–646.
Clark, T. N. (2010). Introduction. In T. N. Clark (Ed.), Gabriel Tarde on communication and social influence (pp. 1–71). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Corsín Jiménez, A. (2010). The height, length and width of social theory. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde (pp. 111–129). London: Routledge.
Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography and vision: Seeing, imagining and representing the world. London: I.B.Tauris.
Crang, M. (1998). Cultural geography. London: Routledge.
Davidson, J., & Milligan, C. (2004). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523–532.
Deacon, B., & Schwartz, S. (2007). Cornish identities and migration: A multi-scalar approach. Global Networks, 7(3), 289–306.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93–97.
Dodds, P. S., Muhamad, R., & Watts, D. J. (2003). An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science, 301(5634), 827–829.
Dodgshon, R. A. (2008). In what way is the world really flat? Debates over geographies of the moment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(2), 300–314.
Edmonds, M. (2006). Who said romance was dead? Journal of Material Culture, 11(1–2), 167–188.
Elwood, S. A., & Martin, D. G. (2000). “Placing” interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. The Professional Geographer, 52(4), 649–657.
Escobar, A. (2007). The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 106–111.
Escobar, A., & Osterweil, M. (2009). Social movements and the politics of the virtual: Deleuzian strategies. In C. B. Jensen & K. Rödje (Eds.), Deleuzian intersections in science, technology & anthropology (pp. 187–217). New York: Berghahn Books.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-Identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Graybill, J. K. (2013). Imagining resilience: Situating perceptions and emotions about climate change on Kamchatka. Russia. GeoJournal, 78(5), 817–832.
Harvey, D. C. (forthcoming). Heritage and scale: Settings, boundaries and relations. In L. Smith, W. Logan, & H. Silverman (Eds.), Theorizing heritage. London: Routledge.
Herod, A. (2011). Scale. Abingdon: Routledge.
Herod, A., & Wright, M. W. (2002). Placing scale: An introduction. In A. Herod & M. W. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of power: Placing scale (pp. 1–14). Malden: Blackwell.
Hopkins, P. E. (2007). Thinking critically and creatively about focus groups. Area, 39(4), 528–535.
Hoskins, W. G. (1985). The making of the English landscape. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Howitt, R. (1998). Scale as relation: Musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area, 30(1), 49–58.
Howitt, R. (2003). Scale. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 138–157). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jackson, P. (2004). Local consumption cultures in a globalizing world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(2), 165–178.
Jenkins, T. (2010). One or three: Issues of comparison. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde (pp. 102–109). London: Routledge.
Jonas, A. E. G. (1994). The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12(3), 257–264.
Jonas, A. E. G. (2011). Scale and networks. In J. Agnew & J. Duncan (Eds.), Companion to human geography (pp. 387–403). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kaiser, R., & Nikiforova, E. (2008). The performativity of scale: The social construction of scale effects in Narva, Estonia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 537–562.
Katz, J. (1999). How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Katz, C. (2003). Social formations: Thinking about society, identity, power and resistance. In S. Holloway, S. P. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 249–265). London: Sage.
Kekäläinen, O. (2006). Runon ja laulun Karjala. In K. Katajala & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Maakunnan synty: Pohjois-Karjalan historia 1809–1939 (pp. 271–304). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Knight, J., & Harrison, S. (2013). ‘A land history of men’: The intersection of geomorphology, culture and heritage in Cornwall, southwest England. Applied Geography, 42, 186–194.
Koefoed, L., & Simonsen, K. (2012). (Re)scaling identities: Embodied others and alternative spaces of identification. Ethnicities, 12(5), 623–642.
Latham, A. (2002). Retheorizing the scale of globalization: Topologies, actor-networks, and cosmopolitanism. In A. Herod & M. W. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of power: Placing scale (pp. 115–144). Malden: Blackwell.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to the actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laviolette, P. (2003). Landscaping death: Resting places for Cornish identity. Journal of Material Culture, 8(2), 215–240.
Laviolette, P. (2012). Homo Directus: Directionality as a cultural metaphor for Cornishness. Ethnologia Europaea, 42(1), 40–53.
Leitner, H. (2004). The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: Transnational interurban networks and the rescaling of political governance in Europe. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry (pp. 236–255). Oxford: Blackwell.
Leitner, H. (2012). Spaces of encounters: Immigration, race, class, and the politics of belonging in small-town America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4), 828–846.
Leitner, H., & Miller, B. (2007). Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 116–125.
Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172.
Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32(4), 551–559.
MacKinnon, D. (2011a). Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 21–36.
MacKinnon, K. (2011b). Identification. In V. Del Casino Jr., M. E. Thomas, P. Cloke, & R. Panelli (Eds.), A companion to social geography (pp. 37–54). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwel.
Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–242.
Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P, III, & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432.
Meinander, H. (2006). Finlands historia. Helsingfors: Werner Söderström.
Mills, A. (2006). Boundaries of the nation in the space of the urban: Landscape and social memory in Istanbul. Cultural Geographies, 13(3), 367–394.
Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 203–225.
Nicholls, W., Miller, B., & Beaumont, J. (2013). Conceptualizing the spatialities of social movements. In W. Nicholls, B. Miller, & J. Beaumont (Eds.), Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements (pp. 1–23). Farnham: Ashgate.
Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life. Environment and Planning A, 23(2), 239–256.
Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4), 536–546.
Pain, R. (2009). Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 466–486.
Pile, S. (2010). Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20.
Pratt, G. (1999). Geographies of identity and difference: marking boundaries. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 151–167). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Prytherch, D. L. (2010). ‘Vertebrating’ the region as networked space of flows: Learning from the spatial grammar of Catalanist territoriality. Environment and Planning A, 42(7), 1537–1554.
Rannila, P. (2011). Scale and the construction of urban space: Temporary re-scaling in Lahti, Finland, during the European Union meeting of 2006. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 65(2), 93–103.
Rapport, N. (2012). Anyone: The cosmopolitan subject of anthropology. New York: Berghahn Books.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Traditional identities and public spheres. Ithica: Cornell University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sidaway, J. D. (2009). Shadows on the path: Negotiating geopolitics on an urban section of Britain’s South West Coast Path. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(6), 1091–1116.
Smith, M., Davidson, J., Cameron, L., & Bondi, L. (2009). Geography and emotion—emerging constellations. In M. Smith, J. Davidson, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Emotion, place and culture (pp. 1–18). Abingdon: Ashgate.
Sörlin, S. (1999). The articulation of territory: Landscape and the constitution of regional and national identity. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 53(2–3), 103–112.
Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Staeheli, L. A. (2008). Citizenship and the problem of community. Political Geography, 27(1), 5–21.
Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Strathern, M. (2010). Afterword. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde (pp. 271–277). London: Routledge.
Swyngedouw, E., & Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The Congolese diaspora in Brussels and hybrid identity formation: Multi-scalarity and diasporic citizenship. Urban Research & Practice, 2(1), 68–90.
Terlouw, K. (2012). From thick to thin regional identities? GeoJournal, 77(5), 707–721.
Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57–78.
Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2008). Motion/Emotion: Picturing translocal landscapes in the Nurturing ecologies research project. Mobilities, 3(1), 117–140.
Vainikka, J. (2008). Reflections of global cities and on the connections between them. Nordia Geographical Publications, 37(6), 45–62.
Vainikka, J. (2012). Narrative claims on regions: Prospecting for spatial identities among social movements in Finland. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(6), 587–605.
Vainikka, J. (2013). The role of identity for regional actors and citizens in a splintered region: The case of Päijät-Häme. Finland. Fennia, 191(1), 25–39.
Warren, C. A. B., & Karner, T. X. (2010). Discovering qualitative methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Western, J. (2008). Russian dolls or scale skippers? Two generations in Strasbourg. The Geographical Review, 98(4), 532–550.
Wills, J. (2012). The geography of community and political organization in London today. Political Geography, 31(2), 114–126.
Wood, N., & Waite, L. (2011). Editorial: Scales of belonging. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(4), 201–202.
Wylie, J. (2007). Landscape. London: Routledge.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2010). Theorizing identity: Beyond the ‘us’ and ‘them’ dichotomy. Patterns of Prejudice, 44(3), 261–280.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the Academy of Finland (Grant Number 121992). I am grateful to the University of Exeter and David C. Harvey for hospitality during my stay in 2010. I thank the editor, Daniel Sui, the anonymous referees, and Lauren Martin, Maaria Niskala, Anssi Paasi and Vilhelmiina Vainikka for their constructive and supportive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vainikka, J.T. ‘A citizen of all the different bits’: emotional scaling of identity. GeoJournal 81, 5–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9596-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9596-0