Abstract
Securing high-quality potable water is a key challenge for all societies. The question is not only about water availability and quality determined by hydrological, chemical, and biological factors, or technologies and monetary assets, but also about various cultural, social, and political factors that together constitute so-called hydro-social cycles. We focus on risk communication and management, in connection with the debates on planning and construction of an artificial groundwater recharge system in the Virttaankangas esker, aiming to provide potable water for the region of Turku, southwest Finland. Based on print media coverage, online debate, and comments on the environmental impact assessment report, we identify key themes and framings of risk debates and discuss which elements of the hydro-social cycle are prone to be highlighted or omitted. Our results show how different framings of risks and benefits are represented with regard to geography, time span, causative agents, impact types, those exposed, alternative management options, and uncertainties involved. Representations created both by traditional print media and new social media polarise the debate. The adoption of the concept of the hydro-social cycle in planning and communication processes may help in understanding and alleviating polarisation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. London: UCL Press.
Andersson, H. (2010). Veden saatavuus. Oikeustieteellinen tutkimus. Helsingin yliopisto, Oikeustieteellinen tiedekunta. Doctoral dissertation. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-92-7482-6 Accessed 12 January 2014.
Artimo, A., Saraperä, S., & Ylander, I. (2008). Methods for integrating an extensive geodatabase with 3D modeling and data management tools for the Virttaankangas artificial recharge project, Southwestern Finland. Water Resources Management, 22(12), 1723–1739.
Assmuth, T., Hilden, M., Lyytimäki, J., Benighaus, C., & Renn, O. (2009). Big pictures, close-ups, roadmaps and mind-maps: perspectives on integrated treatment of multiple risks. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 13(3/4), 294–312.
Barnes, J. (2012). Mixing waters: The reuse of agricultural drainage water in Egypt. Geoforum. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.019.
Bouleau, G. (2013). The co-production of science and waterscapes: The case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France. Geoforum. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.01.009.
Bourblanc, M., & Blanchon, D. (2013). The challenges of rescaling South African water resources management: Catchment management agencies and interbasin transfers. Journal of Hydrology. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.001.
Bouwer, H. (2002). Artificial recharge of groundwater: Hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1), 121–142.
Brown, R. R., Keath, N., & Wong, T. H. F. (2009). Urban water management in cities: Historical, current and future regimes. Water Science and Technology, 59(5), 847–855.
Budds, J. (2009). Contested H(2)O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40(3), 418–430.
Carey, M., French, A., & O’Brien, E. (2012). Unintended effects of technology on climate change adaptation: An historical analysis of water conflicts below Andean glaciers. Journal of Historical Geography, 38(2), 181–191.
Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Evans, D., Stephenson, M., & Shaw, R. (2009). The present and future use of ‘land’ below ground. Land Use Policy, 26(S1), S302–S316.
Fernandez, S. (2013). Much ado about minimum flows… Unpacking indicators to reveal water politics. Geoforum,. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.017.
Finewood, M. H., & Stroup, L. J. (2012). Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 147(1), 72–79.
Helmisaari, H.-S., Illmer, K., Hatva, T., Lindroos, A.-J., Miettinen, I., Pääkkönen, J., et al. (2003). Tekopohjaveden muodostaminen: Imeytystekniikka, maaperäprosessit ja veden laatu. TEMU-tutkimushankkeen loppuraportti. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 902, 209.
Hurlimann, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2012). Newspaper coverage of water issues in Australia. Water Research, 46(19), 6497–6507.
Isomäki, E., Britschgi, R., Gustafsson, J., Kuusisto, E., Munsterhjelm, K., Santala, E., Suokko, T. & Valve, M. (2007). Yhdyskuntien vedenhankinnan tulevaisuuden vaihtoehdot. Suomen ympäristö 27/2007. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.
Johnson, J. T. (2012). Place-based learning and knowing: Critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity. GeoJournal, 77(6), 829–836.
Jönsson, A. (2011). Framing environmental risks in the Baltic Sea: A news media analysis. Ambio, 40(2), 121–132.
Katko, T. S. (2000). Long-term development of water and sewage services in Finland. Public Works Management Policy, 4(4), 305–318.
Katko, T. S., Lipponen, M. A., & Rönkä, E. K. T. (2006). Groundwater use and policy in community water supply in Finland. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(1–2), 69–78.
Kiljunen, P. (2013). Tiedebarometri 2013. Porvoo: Tieteen tiedotus Ry.
Kitti, H. (2013). Pohjavesien laadullisen turvaamisen ja puhdistamisen hyödyt Suomessa. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 34/2013. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.
Kivimäki, A.-L. (1992). Tekopohjavesilaitokset suomessa. Helsinki: National Board of Waters and the Environment.
Klemm, O., Schemenauer, R. S., Lummerich, A., Cereceda, P., Marzol, V., Corell, D., et al. (2012). Fog as a fresh-water resource: Overview and perspectives. Ambio, 41(3), 221–234.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Kummu, M., Ward, P. J., de Moel, H., & Varis, O. (2010). Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environmental. Research Letters, 5(3), 034006.
Kuusisto, E. (2004). Hydrology. In P. Eloranta (Ed.), Inland and coastal waters of Finland (pp. 2–17). Saarijärvi: Palmenia Publishing.
Lahtinen, R., & Vuorisalo, T. (2004). Sewers, wastewater and newspapers: The early environmental debate on water pollution in Turku, Finland, 1887–1934. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 52(1), 34–51.
Lahtinen, R., & Vuorisalo, T. (2005). In search for the roots of environmental concern: Water management and animal welfare issues in the Finnish local press in 1890–1950. Scandinavian Journal of History, 30(2), 177–197.
Lavapuro, M., Lipponen, A., Artimo, A., & Katko, T. S. (2008). Groundwater sustainability indicators: Testing with Finnish data. Boreal Environment Research, 13(5), 381–402.
Lavento, H. (2009). Nokian vesikriisi yllätti: Vaaran merkkejä ei havaittu. Media and Viestintä, 32(1), 82–96.
Levikintarkastus. (2013). Digilukeminen lisää lehtien kokonaistavoittavuutta. Kansallinen Mediatutkimus 29.4.2013. Levikintarkastus Oy & TNS Gallup Oy. http://www.levikintarkastus.fi/mediatutkimus/KMT_kokonaistavoittavuus_tiedote_huhtikuu_2013.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2014.
Leys, A. J., & Vanclay, J. K. (2011). Social learning: A knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy, 28(3), 574–584.
Lodenius, M. (1985). Kvicksilvret som miljöproblem i Finland—förekomst, emissioner och mobilitet. Helsinki: Institutionen för miljövård, Helsinfors universitetet.
Lyytimäki, J. M. (2007). Temporalities and environmental reporting: Press news on eutrophication in Finland. Environmental Sciences, 4(1), 41–51.
Lyytimäki, J. (2011). Mainstreaming climate policy: The role of media coverage in Finland. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(6), 649–661.
Lyytimäki, J. (2012). Gone with the wind? Newspaper discourse of eutrophication and blue-green algae blooms in Finland. Water and Environment Journal, 26(3), 405–414.
Lyytimäki, J., Assmuth, T., & Hildén, M. (2011). Unrecognized, concealed or forgotten—the case of absent information in risk communication. Journal of Risk Research, 14(6), 757–773.
Matamoros, V., & Salvadó, V. (2013). Evaluation of a coagulation/flocculation-lamellar clarifier and filtration-UV-chlorination reactor for removing emerging contaminants at full-scale wastewater treatment plants in Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 96–102.
Meehan, K., Ormerod, K. J., & Moore, S. A. (2013). Remaking waste as water: The governance of recycled effluent for potable water supply. Water Alternatives, 6(1), 67–85.
Meissner, R., & Turton, A. (2003). The hydrosocial contract theory and the Lesotho Highlands water project. Water Policy, 5(2), 115–126.
Merrett, S. (2004). Integrated water resources management and the hydrosocial balance. Water International, 29(2), 148–157.
Micklin, P. P. (1996). Man and the water cycle: Challenges for the 21st century. GeoJournal, 39(3), 285–298.
Norman, E. S., Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2012). Introduction to the themed section: Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 52–61.
Opare, S. (2012). Rainwater harvesting: An option for sustainable rural water supply in Ghana. GeoJournal, 77(5), 695–705.
Peuhkuri, T. (2002). Knowledge and interpretation in environmental conflict: Fish farming and eutrophication in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(2–4), 157–168.
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118–129.
Schmid, A. N., Thompson, J. R., & Bengston, D. N. (2007). The public discourse about land use and water quality: Themes in newspapers in the upper Mississippi river basin. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 6(2), 187–196.
Sheelanere, P., Noble, B. F., & Patrick, R. J. (2013). Institutional requirements for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: Lessons from a Canadian trans-boundary watershed. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 67–75.
Söderman, T. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment—from components to services. Department of Geosciences and Geography A16. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Stenroos, M., & Rajalin, E. (1999). Puhtaan veden valtiaat: Juomavesikysymys Turussa. In S. Laakkonen, S. Laurila, & M. Rahikainen (Eds.), Harmaat aallot—ympäristönsuojelun tulo suomeen (pp. 143–158). Vammala: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 142(1), 56–60.
Vallin, J. (1999). Aurajoki avoviemärinä. In S. Laakkonen, S. Laurila, & M. Rahikainen (Eds.), Harmaat aallot—ympäristönsuojelun tulo suomeen (pp. 159–174). Vammala: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.
Vienonen, S., Rintala, J., Orvomaa, M., Santala, E. & Maunula, M. (2012). Ilmastonmuutoksen vaikutukset ja sopeutumistarpeet vesihuollossa. Suomen ympäristö 24/2012. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus.
YLE. (2003). Tekopohjavesi—maku korvien välissä. Finnish National Broadcasting Company, YLE. TV1/MOT. September 26, 2003. Transcript available from: http://yle.fi/mot/mb220903/kasikirjoitus.htm. Accessed 12 January 2014.
Acknowledgments
This research received financial support from the Academy of Finland project Aquatic Contaminants—Pathways, Health Risks and Management (CONPAT) of the Sustainable Governance of Aquatic Resources (AKVA) programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyytimäki, J., Assmuth, T. Down with the flow: public debates shaping the risk framing of artificial groundwater recharge. GeoJournal 80, 113–127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9540-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9540-3