Skip to main content
Log in

Place-based learning and knowing: critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For Indigenous peoples, knowledge and science are written onto the landscapes our languages “talk into being” through the “individual and collective consciousness of our communities (Cajete 2000, 284).” Our landscapes are the storied histories, cosmogonies, philosophies and sciences of those Indigenous knowledges which are increasingly being pushed aside by the ‘gray uniformity’ of globalization and its progenitor, European colonization. It is within storied places that we can still glimpse alternatives to this gray uniformity of globalization which brings with it a rhetoric of capitalism, modernism, abstract space and Western science. It is this rhetoric produced through globalization which erases the storied landscapes, destroying the libraries embedded within Indigenous toponyms, creating a terra nullius: an empty land awaiting a colonial/neo-colonial history and economy. As Paulo Freire has challenged us to see, critical consciousness requires us to “read our world,” decoding the images of our own concrete, situated experiences with the world (Freire and Macedo 1987, 35). A critical pedagogy of place recognizes the concrete experiences of communities grounded in shared histories, stories and challenges based within a politics of place. A critical pedagogy of place seeks to decolonize and reinhabit the storied landscape through ‘reading’ the ways in which Indigenous peoples’ places and environment have been injured and exploited. This paper seeks to discuss how through reading the places in the world as ‘political texts,’ one may engage in reflection and praxis in order to understand, and where necessary, to change the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Noel Castree (2009) provides an excellent discussion of the role of ‘place’ in contemporary geographic research.

  2. In a manner similar to Edward Casey (2001, 683), I am envisioning landscapes as “the presented layout of a set of places, not their mere accumulation but their sensuous self-presentation as a whole.”

  3. I am using the terms ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ in keeping with Robert Sack’s (1997) description in Homo Geographicus, as I find these terms offer a clear description of the shift in place making. I do not, however, agree with Sack’s concern that a significant attachment to place requires shutting ourselves off from the global society or caring about those beyond our borders.

References

  • Agnew, J. A. (1987). Place and politics: The geographical mediation of state and society. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. A. (2005). Space: Place. In P. J. Cloke & R. J. Johnston (Eds.), Spaces of geographical thought: deconstructing human geography’s binaries (pp. 81–96). London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, B. (2001). Post-colonial transformation. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. A., & Youngblood Henderson, J. (2000). Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge, Purich’s Aboriginal issues series. Saskatoon: Purich Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1977). The unsettling of America: Culture & agriculture. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Nichol, L. (1998). On creativity. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, L. (2001). Writing for an endangered world: literature, culture, and environment in the U.S. and beyond. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, Giselle. (2001). Boundary markers: Land surveying and the colonisation of New Zealand. Wellington, N.Z.: Bridget Williams Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Sante Fe, New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (1987). The road to Botany Bay: An essay in spatial history. London, Boston: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Studies in Continental thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (2001). Between geography and philosophy: What does it mean to be in the place-world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2004). Differential geographies: Place, indigenous rights and `local’ resources. Political Geography, 23(2), 133–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2009). Place: Connections and boundaries in an interdependent world. In N. J. Clifford, S. L. Holloway, S. P. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 153–172). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, W. (1993). Struggle for the land: Indigenous resistance to genocide, ecocide, and expropriation in contemporary North America. Monroe, Me.: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1995). Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, V., & Wildcat, D. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden, Colo.: Fulcrum Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., Jeffery, B., & Centre Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Ethics Interagency Advisory Panel on Research. (2004). The ethics of research involving indigenous peoples: Report of the Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Saskatoon: Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20(2), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. 30th anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. P. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word & the world, Critical studies in education series. South Hadley, Mass.: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2008). Place-based education: Grounding cultural responsive teaching in geographical diversity. In D. A. Gruenewald & G. A. Smith (Eds.), Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity (pp. 137–153). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. & Krell, D. F. (1993). Basic writings: From Being and time (1927) to The task of thinking (1964). Rev. and expanded ed. [San Francisco, Calif.]: Harper San Francisco.

  • Howitt, R., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2003). Ontological pluralism in contested cultural landscapes. In M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 557–569). London, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of landscape. World Archaeology, 25, 152–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling & skill. London; New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T., & Murton, B. (2007). Re/placing native science: Indigenous voices in contemporary constructions of nature. Geographical Research, 45(2), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Cloke, P. J. (2002). Tree Cultures: The place of trees and trees in their place. Oxford, New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. (1979). Axioms for reading the landscape. In D. W. Meinig (Ed.), The interpretation of ordinary landscapes (pp. 11–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little Bear, L. (2000). Jagged worldviews colliding. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 77–85). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, R. P. (2004). Indigenous Hawaiian cartographer: In search of common ground. Cartographic Perspectives, 48(Spring), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Giroux, H. (1990). Critical pedagogy and rural education: A challenge from Poland. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(4), 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1995). Reinventing Eden: Western culture as a recovery narrative. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (pp. 132–167). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in Western culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaday, N. S. (1976). Native American attitudes to the environment. In Å. Hultkrantz & W. H. Capps (Eds.), Seeing with a native eye: Essays on native American religion (pp. 84–92). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. (2007). Indigenous language consciousness: Being, place, and sovereignty. In E. L. Gansworth (Ed.), Sovereign bones: New Native American writing (pp. 135–148). New York, NY: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason, Environmental philosophies series. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (1999). Indigenous ecologies and an ethic of connection. In N. Low (Ed.), Global ethics and environment (pp. 175–187). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. B. (2004). Reports from a wild country: Ethics for decolonization. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1997). Homo geographicus: A framework for action, awareness, and moral concern. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. (2000). Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the organizing committee, the Council of Indigenous Peoples of Taiwan, and the various Indigenous Nations who welcomed us to Taiwan for the joint conference between the Indigenous Peoples’ Knowledges and Rights Commission and Islands Commission of the International Geographical Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay T. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J.T. Place-based learning and knowing: critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity. GeoJournal 77, 829–836 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9379-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9379-1

Keywords

Navigation