Abstract
Over the past decade, Indigenous peoples in Taiwan have shown a strong desire for the “return of the Native”; this includes the Truku people in eastern Taiwan. Seizing a favorable climate of political opportunity structure in 2004, the Truku people first succeeded in obtaining the Taiwanese government’s recognition as an independent Indigenous nation—formerly considered a subgroup of the Atayal Nation. Then, riding on accumulated political resources, a few Truku elites started to engage in a government-initiated tribal mapping project. However, while tribal mapping originated in some North American Indigenous communities with a bottom-up process and spirit, the Taiwanese government sent both money (through the municipal government) and an academic expert team into the community to initiate and to assist (the elite group) with the tribal mapping project. These top-down government initiatives resulted in at least two major ill effects. First of all, two other subgroups of the Atayal Nation living in the same region were systematically excluded from the tribal mapping project, to the extent that their own traditional territories became part of the traditional territory of the newly formed Truku Nation. Secondly, possibly expecting a high political payoff on the part of elites, elite competition arose during the process of tribal mapping, with the interests of other community members largely ignored. As such, instead of establishing a decolonizing force, the “return of the Truku” appears to have achieved “colonialism from within.” This paper analyzes this process and considers ways to develop a more democratic strategy for the “return of the Truku.”
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Unpublished minutes from Tzong-De village meetings on re-naming the Truku nation in 2002.
The Truku people were categorized by Japanese scholars as a subgroup of Atayal people during the Japanese colonial rule of Taiwan; the KMT government continued to follow the Japanese categorization system.
References
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.
Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In F. Barth (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries (pp. 9–38). Illinois: Waveland Press.
Brass, P. R. (1991). Ethnicity and nationalism: Theory and comparison. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chapin, M., Lamb, Z., & Threlkeld, B. (2005). Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 619–638.
Cornell, S. (1988). The return of the native: American Indian political resurgence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crang, M. (1998). Cultural geography. New York: Routledge.
Fanon, F. (1999). On national culture. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory (pp. 36–52). New York: Columbia University Press.
Flavelle, A. (1996). Community mapping handbook: A guide to making your own maps of communities and traditional lands. Edmonton, Canada: Long Pine Foundation.
Hobsbawn, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. S. (2002, November). The Truwan nation: Ethnic identification and construction. Paper presented at the construction, identity, and division of atayal national consciousness conference, Taipei.
Li, C. S. (2003). Walking pass the rainbow bridge. Hualien: Truku Cultural Workshop.
Liau, S. C. (1977). The migration and distribution of Atayal’s east Sedeq tribe. Ethnological Research, (44), 61–206.
Lin, S. T. (2001). National identification of the indigenous people. Taipei: Council for Indigenous Peoples.
Sasala, Taiban. (2001). Drawing a story-telling map: Rukai nation’s tribal mapping experiences. In Taroko National Park (Ed.), Bringing people back in: Local participation of natural resource management (pp. 129–138). Hualien, Taiwan: Taroko National Park.
Sun, D. T. (2000). Ethnicity construction in between. Taipei: Unitas Publishing Co.
Wang, M. K. (1997). Chinese boundaries: Historic memories and ethnic identities. Taipei: Yun Chen.
Weber, M. (1969). Ethnic groups. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society (pp. 385–398). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chi, CC., Chin, HT. Knowledge, power, and tribal mapping: a critical analysis of the “return of the Truku people”. GeoJournal 77, 733–740 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9374-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9374-6