Issue indivisibility and territorial claims* Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Hensel, P.R. & Mitchell, S.M. GeoJournal (2005) 64: 275. doi:10.1007/s10708-005-5803-3 Abstract
Early research on contentious issues in world politics suggested that there is an important distinction between largely tangible and largely intangible issues. Tangible issues are thought to be easier to resolve, while intangible issues can fester for long periods of time through fruitless negotiations and repeated armed conflict. Research on territorial issues has suggested that many territorial claims are driven by both tangible and intangible concerns, though, which complicates the analysis of issue tangibility. The authors argue that territorial issues with greater intangible salience (e.g. historical possessions, important homelands, sacred sites, identity ties) should be harder to resolve peacefully and should produce more frequent and severe militarized conflict. Empirical analyses of 191 territorial claims in the Americas and Western Europe (1816–2001) provide mixed support for these expectations. Territorial claims with high intangible salience are significantly more likely to experience militarized disputes and wars. Surprisingly, though, states are much more likely to strike peaceful agreements with their adversaries over territories that are valued for intangible reasons.
Keywords indivisible intangible issues militarized conflict salience territory
*This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants SES-0079421 and SES-0214447.
References Bercovitch, J., Langley, J. 1993 The nature of dispute and the effectiveness of international mediation Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 670 691 Google Scholar Bowman, I. 1946 The strategy of territorial decisions Foreign Affairs 24 177 194 Google Scholar Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D. 1996Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar Diehl, P.F. 1992 What are they fighting for? The importance of issues in international conflict research Journal of Peace Research 29 333 344 Google Scholar Fearon, J.D. 1995 Rationalist explanations for war International Organization 49 379 414 CrossRef Google Scholar Ghosn, F., Palmer, G., Bremer, S. 2004 The MID 3 data set, 1993–2001: procedures, coding rules, and description Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 133 154 CrossRef Google Scholar Goertz, G., Diehl, P.F. 1992Territorial Changes and International Conflict Routledge London Google Scholar Hassner, R.E. 2003 To halve and to hold: conflicts over sacred space and the problem of indivisibility Security Studies 12 1 33 CrossRef Google Scholar Hastings, M., Jenkins, S. 1983The Battle for the Falklands W.W. Norton New York Google Scholar Hensel, P.R. 1996 Charting a course to conflict: territorial issues and militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992 Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 43 73 CrossRef Google Scholar Hensel, P.R. 2000 Territory: theory and evidence on geography and conflict Vasquez, J.A. eds. What Do We Know about War? Rowman and Littlefield Lanham, MD Google Scholar Hensel, P.R. 2001 Contentious issues and world politics: territorial claims in the Americas, 1816–1992 International Studies Quarterly 45 81 109 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hensel P.R., Allison M. and Tures J., 2005: Credible commitments and negotiations over territory. Working paper, Florida State University
Hensel P.R., Mitchell S.M. and Sowers T., 2006: Conflict management of riparian disputes: a regional comparison of dispute resolution.
Political Geography, forthcoming Hill, N. 1945Claims to Territory in International Law and Relations Oxford University Press New York Google Scholar Holsti, K.J. 1991Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989 Cambridge University Press New York Google Scholar Huth, P.K. 1996Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Google Scholar Keohane, R.O., Nye, J.S. 1977Power and Interdependence Little, Brown Boston Google Scholar Kugler, J. Lemke, D. eds. 1996Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Ledger University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Google Scholar Luard, E. 1970The International Regulation of Frontier Disputes Praeger New York Google Scholar Luard, E. 1986War in International Society I. B. Tauris and Company London Google Scholar Mansbach, R., Vasquez, J. 1981In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics Columbia University Press New York Google Scholar
Marshall M.G. and Jaggers, K., 2000: Polity IV dataset.
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/ Mitchell, S.M., Prins, B.C. 1999 Beyond territorial contiguity: issues at stake in democratic militarized interstate disputes International Studies Quarterly 43 169 183 CrossRef Google Scholar Most, B., Starr, H., Siverson, R.M. 1989 The logic and study of the diffusion of international conflict Midlarsky, M.I. eds. Handbook of War Studies The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Google Scholar Murphy, A. 1990 Historical justifications for territory claims Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 531 648 CrossRef Google Scholar Pruitt, D.G. 1971 Indirect communication and the search for agreement in negotiation Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1 205 239 CrossRef Google Scholar Randle, R. 1987Issues in the History of International Relations Praeger New York Google Scholar Reed, W. 2002 A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation American Journal of Political Science 44 84 93 Google Scholar Rosenau, J.N. 1971 Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy Rosenau, J.N. eds. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy Free Press New York Google Scholar Rubin, J.Z., Brown, B.R. 1975The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation Academic Press New York Google Scholar Russett, B., Oneal, J.R. 2001Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations W. W. Norton & Company New York Google Scholar Schelling, T.C. 1960The Strategy of Conflict Oxford University Press New York Google Scholar Senese, P.D. 1996 Geographical proximity and issue salience: their effect on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 133 161 Google Scholar Senese, P.D., Vasquez, J.A. 2003 A unified explanation of territorial conflict: testing the impact of sampling bias, 1919–1992 International Studies Quarterly 47 275 298 CrossRef Google Scholar Simowitz, R. 1998 Evaluating conflict research on the diffusion of war Journal of Peace Research 35 211 230 Google Scholar Singer, J.D., Bremer, S., Stuckey, J. 1972 Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965 Russett, B. eds. Peace, War, and Numbers Sage Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar Starr, H., Siverson, R.M. 1998 Cumulation, evaluation, and the research process: investigating the diffusion of conflict Journal of Peace Research 35 231 237 Google Scholar Starr, H., Thomas, G.D. 2002 The ‘nature’ of contiguous borders: ease of interaction, salience, and the analysis of crisis International Interactions 28 213 235 CrossRef Google Scholar Tir, J. 2003 Averting armed international conflicts through state-to-state territorial transfers Journal of Politics 65 1235 1257 CrossRef Google Scholar Toft, M.D. 2003The Geography of Ethnic Violence Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ Google Scholar Vasquez, J.A. 1983 The tangibility of issues and global conflict: a test of Rosenau’s issue area typology Journal of Peace Research 20 179 192 Google Scholar Vasquez, J.A. 1993The War Puzzle Cambridge University Press Cambridge Google Scholar Vasquez, J.A. 1995 Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interaction, or territoriality Journal of Peace Research 32 277 293 Google Scholar Vasquez, J.A., Henehan, M.T. 2001 Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992 Journal of Peace Research 38 123 138 Google Scholar Walter, B.F. 2003 Explaining the intractability of territorial conflict International Studies Review 5 137 153 CrossRef Google Scholar