Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving label placement quality by considering basemap detail with a raster-based approach

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topographic maps are arguably one of the most information-dense, yet intuitively usable, graphical artifacts produced by mankind. Cartography as science and practice has developed and collected a wealth of design principles and techniques to cope with the problems of high graphical density, especially for the case of label placement. Many of the more sophisticated techniques that take into account figure-ground relationships for lettering have not been fully operationalized until now. We present a novel generic quality evaluation model that allows full automation of refined techniques for improving map feature overlap, visual contrast and layer hierarchy. We present the objective function as a set of metrics corresponding to the design principles and provide exemplary parameterization via the set of experiments on global real-world datasets. The approach designed for labeling of point-like objects and can potentially be applied to linear and areal features. It has a low computational and memory requirement. Furthermore, it is conceivably applicable to annotate any kind of visualization beyond maps. The results of the conducted tests and comparison with a commercial labeling package illustrate the ability to produce highly legible and readable map lettering with our approach. Presented method heeds more cartographic design principles and is computationally less costly compared to commercially available methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams R, Bischof L (1994) Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intel 16(6):641–647. doi:10.1109/34.295913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn J, Freeman H (1984) A program for automatic name placement. Cartographica 21(2–3):101–109. doi:10.3138/0646-Q262-6636-3681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTER Validation Team (2011) ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 – Summary of Validation Results. Published by the ASTER GDEM Validation Team: METI, NASA and USGS. August 2011, 27 pages. Available online at: http://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/ersdac/GDEM/ver2Validation/Summary_GDEM2_validation_report_final.pdf. http://reverb.echo.nasa.gov.

  4. Barrault M (2001) A methodology for placement and evaluation of area map labels. Comput Environ Urban Syst 25(1):33–52. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battista GD, Eades P, Tamassia R, Tollis IG (1994) Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Comput Geom: Theory Appl 4(5):235–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Been K, Daiches E, Yap C (2006) Dynamic map labeling. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graphics 12(5):773–780. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2006.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewer CA (2005) Designing better maps: a guide for gis users. ESRI Press, Redlands CA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown B (1976) Effect of background constraint on visual search times. Ergonomics 19(4):441–449. doi:10.1080/00140137608931556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carstensen LW (1987) A comparison of simple mathematical approaches to the placement of spot symbols. Cartographica 24(3):46–63. doi:10.3138/GH04-24H7-63T8-167V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castner HW, Eastman RJ (1985) Eye-movement parameters and perceived map complexity—ii. Am Cartographer 12(1):29–40. doi:10.1559/152304085783914712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen J, Marks J, Shieber S (1995) An empirical study of algorithms for point-feature label placement. ACM Trans Graph 14(3):203–232. doi:10.1145/212332.212334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CIE (1978) Recommendations on uniform colour spaces, colour difference equations. CIE Publication, Psychometric Colour Terms

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cromley RG (1985) An LP relaxation procedure for annotating point features using interactive graphics In: proc. AutoCarto 7:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  14. Defence Geographic and Imagery Intelligence Agency (UK) (1973) Series ONC, Sheet F-3, Albania, Bosnia, etc., 1:1000000, Edition 14-GSGS, Reprinted by DGIA, Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom, 2000. Scan provided by University of Texas, Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/onc/txu-pclmaps-oclc-8322829_f_3.jpg (accessed on October 22, 2013)

  15. Doerschler JS, Freeman H (1992) A rule-based system for dense-map name placement. Commun Assoc Comput Mach 35(1):68–79. doi:10.1145/129617.129620

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edmondson S, Christensen J, Marks J, Shieber S (1996) A general cartographic labeling algorithm. Cartographica 33(4):13–24. doi:10.3138/U3N2-6363-130N-H870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ESRI (2009) Maplex for ArcGIS. Paper, An ESRI White, Available at http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/maplex-for-arcgis.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbairn D (2006) Measuring map complexity. Cartogr J 43(3):224–238. doi:10.1179/000870406X169883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman H (1991) Computer name placement. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems: principles and applications. Longman, London, pp 445–456

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman H, Ahn J (1984) AUTONAP – An Expert System for Automatic Map Name Placement. In: Proc. 1st Int Symp on Spatial Data Handling, pp 544–569.

  21. García R, de Castro JP, Verdú E, Verdú MJ, Regueras LM (2012) Web Map Tile Services for Spatial Data Infrastructures: Management and Optimization. In: Bateira C (ed.) Cartography - A Tool for Spatial Analysis, pp 25–48. doi:10.5772/46129

  22. Gervautz M, Purgathofer W (1988) A Simple Method for Color Quantization: Octree Quantization. In: Magnenat-Thalmann N, Thalmann D (ed) New Trends in Comput Graphics, pp 219–231. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83492-9_20

  23. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4):211–221. doi:10.1002/9780470979587.ch48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Götzelmann T, Ali K, Hartmann K, Strothotte T (2005) Form Follows Function: Aesthetic Interactive Labels. In: Comput Aesthetics 2005. EG WS on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, pp 193–200. doi:10.2312/COMPAESTH/COMPAESTH05/193-200

  25. Haklay M, Weber P (2008) Openstreetmap – user generated street map. IEEE Pervasive Comput 7(4):12–18. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2008.80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haralick M, Shapiro LG (1985) Image segmentation techniques. Comput Vision Graph Image Process 29:100–132. doi:10.1016/S0734-189X(85)90153-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrie L, Stigmar H, Koivula T, Lehto L (2004) An algorithm for icon placement on a real-time map. In: Fisher P (ed) Developments in spatial data handling. Springer, Berlin, pp 493–507. doi:10.1007/3-540-26772-7_38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harrie L, Stigmar H (2010) Evaluation of measures for quantifying map information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(3):266–274. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirsch SA (1982) An algorithm for automatic name placement around point data. Am Cartographer 9(1):5–17. doi:10.1559/152304082783948367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hong F, Zuxun Z, Daosheng D (2005) Quality evaluation model for map labeling. Geo Spat Inf Sci 8(1):72–78. doi:10.1007/BF02826996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Imhof E (1975) Positioning names on maps. Am Cartographer 2(2):128–144. doi:10.1559/152304075784313304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Imhof E (1982) Cartographic relief presentation. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  33. Imhof E (2007) Cartographic relief presentation (reprint). ESRI Press, Redmond

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ (1999) Data clustering: review. J ACM Comput Surv 31(3):264–323. doi:10.1145/331499.331504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jenny B, Hurni L (2006) Swiss-style colour relief shading modulated by elevation and by exposure to illumination. Cartogr J 43:198–207. doi:10.1179/000870406X158164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jenny B, Patterson T (2007) Introducing plan oblique relief. Cartogr Perspect 57:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones C (1989) Cartographic name placement with prolog. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 9(5):36–47. doi:10.1109/38.35536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jurio A, Bustince H, Pagola M, Couto P, Pedrycz W (2013) New measures of homogeneity for image processing: an application to fingerprint segmentation. Soft Comput Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/s00500-013-1126-3

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kakoulis KG, Tollis IG (2003) A unified approach to automatic label placement. Int J of Comput Geom Appl 13(1):23–59. doi:10.1142/S0218195903001062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kovanen J, Sarjakoski LT (2013) Sequential displacement and grouping of point symbols in a mobile context. J Locat Based Serv 7(2):79–97. doi:10.1080/17489725.2013.764024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee S, Sips M, Seidel H-P (2013) Perceptually driven visibility optimization for categorical data visualization. In: IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(10):1746–1757. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.315

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lehmann C, Döllner J (2012) Silhouette-based label placement in interactive 3D maps. In: Buchroithner M, Prechtel N, Burghardt D (eds) Cartography from Pole to Pole. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and, Cartography, pp 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leyk S, Boesch R (2010) Colors of the past: color image segmentation in historical topographic maps based on homogeneity. GeoInformatica 14(1):1–21. doi:10.1007/s10707-008-0074-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li Z, Huang P (2002) Quantitative measures for spatial information of maps. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 16(7):699–709. doi:10.1080/13658810210149416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lloyd R (1997) Visual search processes used in map reading. Cartographica 34(1):11–32. doi:10.3138/F342-1217-827R-0777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mote K (2007) Fast point-feature label placement for dynamic visualizations. Inf Vis 6(4):249–260. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Noyes L (1980) The positioning of type on maps: the effect of surrounding material on word recognition time. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 22(3):353–360. doi:10.1177/001872088002200309

    Google Scholar 

  49. Open Geospatial Consortium (2006) OpenGIS Web Map Server Implementation Specification. Tech. Rep. OGC 06–042, In: de la Beaujardiere J (eds.), Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=14416.

  50. Open Geospatial Consortium (2010) OpenGIS Web Map Tile Service Implementation Standard. Tech. Rep. OGC 07-057r7, In: Masó J, Pomakis K, Julià N (eds.), Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=35326.

  51. OpenStreetMap, (2013). (a collaborative project for creating a free editable geo-database of the world. Data © OpenStreetMap contributors; accessed on November 12, 2013). Available at http://openstreetmap.org.

  52. Pal SK, Pal NR (1987) Segmentation using contrast and homogeneity measures. Pattern Recogn Lett 5(4):293–304. doi:10.1016/0167-8655(87)90061-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pal NR, Pal SK (1993) A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognit 29:1277–1294. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J.

  54. Phillips RJ, Noyes L, Audley RJ (1977) The legibility of type on maps. Ergonomics 20(6):671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Phillips RJ, Noyes L (1982) An investigation of visual clutter in the topographic base of a geological map. Cartogr J 19(2):122–132. doi:10.1179/000870482787073225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Purves D, Lotto RB (2010) Why we see what we do redux: a wholly empirical theory of vision, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ramm F, Topf J, Chilton S (2010) openstreetmap: using and enhancing the free map of the world. UIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  58. Reimer A (2011) Squaring the Circle? Bivariate Colour maps and Jacques Bertin's concept of 'Disassociation' (Digital Proceedings), Int Cartographic Conference ICC 2011, Paris.

  59. Robinson AH, Morrison JL, Muehrcke PC, Kimerling AJ, Guptil SC (1995) Elements of cartography, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rylov MA, Reimer AW (2014) A comprehensive multi-criteria model for high cartographic quality point-feature label placement. Cartographica 49(1):52–68. doi:10.3138/carto.49.1.2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rylov MA, Reimer AW (2014) A Practical Algorithm for the External Annotation of Area Features. Cartogr J 51(3). doi:10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000091

  62. Schreyer M, Raidl GR (2002) Letting ants labeling point features. in: proc. IEEE Congr Evol Comput (CEC ′02) 2:1564–1569

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schrijver S (2003) Combinatorial optimization: polyhedra and efficiency. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1964) The mathematical theory of communication, the university of illinois press. Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shapiro LG, Stockman GC (2001) Image segmentation. Computer Vision, pp. 279–325, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

  66. Stadler G, Steiner T, Beiglbock J (2006) A practical map labeling algorithm utilizing morphological image processing and force-directed methods. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 33(3):207–215. doi:10.1559/152304006779077327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Strijk TW, van Kreveld MJ (2002) Practical extensions of point labeling in the slider model. GeoInformatica 6(2):181–197. doi:10.1023/A:1015202410664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sukhov VI (1967) Information capacity of a map entropy. Geodesy Aerophotography 10:212–215

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sukhov VI (1970) Application of information theory in generalization of map contents. Int Yearb Cartogr, X: 41–47

  70. van Dijk S, van Kreveld MJ, Strijk TW, Wolff A (2002) Towards an evaluation of quality for names placement methods. Int J of Geogr Inf Sci 16(7):641–661. doi:10.1080/13658810210138742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. van Kreveld MJ, Strijk TW, Wolff A (1999) Point labeling with sliding labels. Comput Geom: Theory Appl 13:21–47. doi:10.1016/S0925-7721(99)00005-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. van Roessel W (1989) An algorithm for locating candidate labeling boxes within a polygon. Am Cartographer 16(3):201–209. doi:10.1559/152304089783814034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Verner OV, Wainwright RL, Schoenefeld D (1997) Placing text labels on maps and diagrams using genetic algorithms with masking. INFORMS J Comput 9(3):266–275. doi:10.1287/ijoc.9.3.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Williams LG (1967) The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Acta Psychol 27:355–360. doi:10.3758/BF03207398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wojtach WT (2009) Reconsidering perceptual content. Philos Sci 76(1):22–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wolff A, Knipping L, van Kreveld M, Strijk T, Agarwal PK (2001) A Simple and Efficient Algorithm for High-Quality Line Labeling. Technical Report UU-CS-2001-44, Department of Computer Science, Utrecht University.

  77. Wolff A, Strijk T (2009) A map labeling bibliography. Available at http://i11www.iti.uni-karlsruhe.de/~awolff/map-labeling/bibliography

  78. Wood CH (1994) Effects of brightness difference on specific map-analysis tasks: an empirical analysis. Cartog Geogr Inf Sci 21(1):15–30. doi:10.1559/152304094782564019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wood CH (2000) Descriptive and illustrated guide for type placement on small scale maps. Cartogr J 37(1):5–18. doi:10.1179/000870400787320851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Yamamoto M, Camara G, Lorena LAN (2002) Tabu search heuristic for point-feature cartographic label placement. Geophys J R Astron Soc 6(1):77–90. doi:10.1023/A:1013720231747

    Google Scholar 

  81. Yoeli P (1972) The logic of automated map lettering. Cartogr J 9(2):99–108. doi:10.1179/000870472787352505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhang Q, Harrie L (2006) Real-time map labelling for mobile applications. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(6):773–783. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang Q, Harrie L (2006) Placing text and icon labels simultaneously: a real-time method. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 33(1):53–64. doi:10.1559/152304006777323127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zoraster S (1986) Integer programming applied to the map label placement problem. Cartographica 23(3):16–27. doi:10.3138/9258-63QL-3988-110H

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to warmly thank colleagues at our GIScience Research Group for productive discussions and their valuable feedback. We would like to express our particular appreciation to the anonymous reviewers whose constructive and helpful comments substantially improved the paper. Financial support as the scholarship from DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, German Academic Exchange Service) obtained by Maxim Rylov is gratefully acknowledged. Additional thanks go to Sarah Lohr for helping with the comparison of labeling results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GIScience Research Group, Institute of Geography, Heidelberg University, Berliner Straße 48, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Maxim A. Rylov & Andreas W. Reimer

Authors
  1. Maxim A. Rylov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas W. Reimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim A. Rylov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rylov, M.A., Reimer, A.W. Improving label placement quality by considering basemap detail with a raster-based approach. Geoinformatica 19, 463–486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-014-0214-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-014-0214-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation