Abstract
The evaluation of the load acting on a shaft support is of fundamental importance for the correct dimensioning of the structure. The load acting on the support can appear somewhat complex. One approach to define the load on the lining may be to use the convergence-confinement method (CCM) normally used in the tunneling design. This process involves intersecting the convergence-confinement (CC) curve with the support reaction line. However, in order to be able to adopt this technique, it is necessary to know the radial displacement of the shaft wall at the point in which the support is to be installed. Using the equations of Vlachopoulos and Diederichs (Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:131–146, 2009) the reaction line of the support can be calculated. Numerical models developed with Flac 2D v.6.0 considering the Mohr–Coulomb criterion and an ideal elasto-plastic behavior simulating stepwise excavation and support installation were developed. The relation between applied internal stress and radial displacement of the wall shaft, obtained by the numerical simulation was compared with the CC curve obtained by the CCM and it showed a good match between the two methods. However, an iterative procedure has also been used to insert the reaction line in the CC graph. The result shows lower initial displacements (and therefore greater radial stress) when compared with the values obtained by numerical calculation with the axisymmetric model. It is therefore recommended the combined use of the CCM (analytical method) and the axisymmetric numerical model (step by step simulation) to obtain the values of the final load on the lining and the final plastic radius, necessary for the correct design of supporting structures on the shaft wall.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel JF, Dowise E, Richards P (1979) Concrete shaft lining design. In: Proceedings of 20th US symposium on rock mechanics, Austin, TX, pp 627–633
Berezantzev VG (1958) Earth pressure on the cylindrical retaining walls. In: Proceedings of conference on earth pressure problems, Brussels, vol II, pp 21–24
Brown ET, Bray JW, Ladanyi B, Hoek E (1986) Ground response curves for rock tunnels. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109:12–23. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:1(15)
Bullock RL (2011) Subsurface mine development. In: Darling P (ed) SME mining engineering handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Englewood, pp 1203–1221
Carter PG (2011) Selection process for hard-rock mining. In: Darling P (ed) SME mining engineering handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Englewood, pp 357–376
Fenner R (1939) Untersuchungen zur Erkenntnis des Gebirgsdruckes. Glueckauf 74:32–33
Guo Z, Yang X, Bai Y, Zhou F, Li E (2012) A study of support strategies in deep soft rock: the horsehead crossing roadway in Daqiang Coal Mine. Int J Min Sci Technol 22:665–667. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2012.08.012
Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London
ITASCA (2008) Flac 6.0 fast lagrangian analysis of continua, version 6.0-user’s manual. ITASCA Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis
Jia YD, Stace R, Williams A (2013) Numerical modelling of shaft lining stability at deep mine. Min Technol 122:8–19
McCreath DR (1980) Analysis of formation pressure on tunnel and shaft linings. MEng thesis, University of Alberta
Oreste P (2005a) A probabilistic design approach for tunnel supports. Comput Geotech 32:520–534. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.09.003
Oreste P (2005b) Back-analysis techniques for the improvement of the understanding of rock in underground constructions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20:7–21. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2004.04.002
Oreste P (2009a) The convergence-confinement method: roles and limits in modern geomechanical tunnel design. Am J Appl Sci 6:757–771. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2009.757.771
Oreste P (2009b) The determination of the tunnel structure loads through the analysis of the interaction between the void and the support using the convergence-confinement method. Am J Appl Sci 11:1945–1954. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2014.1945.1954
Öztürk H, Ünal E (2001) Estimation of lining thickness around circular shafts. In: Proceedings of 17th international mining congress and exhibition of Turkey—IMCET2001, pp 437–444
Pacher F (1964) Measurements of deformations in a test gallery as a means of investigating the behaviour of the rock mass and specifying lining requirements. Felsmechanik und Ingenieurgeologie Supplement I:149–161
Panet M (1995) Le calcul des tunnels par la méthode convergence-confinement. Presses de l’écolenationale des Ponts et chaussées, Paris
Pratere G (1977) An examination of some theories of earth pressure on shaft linings. Can Geotech J 14:91–106. doi:10.1139/t77-007
Rechsteiner GF, Lombardi G (1974) Une methode de calcul elasto-plastique de l’etat de tension et de deformation autour d’une cavite souterraine. In: Proceedings of 3rd congress of the international society for rock mechanics, (ISRM 74), pp 1049–1054
Rostami J (2011) Mechanical rock breaking. In: Darling P (ed) SME mining engineering handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Englewood, pp 417–434
Spagnoli G, Oreste P, Lo Bianco L (2016) New equations for estimating radial loads on deep shaft linings in weak rocks. Int J Geomech. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000657
Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2009) Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for convergence confinement analysis of deep tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:131–146. doi:10.1007/s00603-009-0176-4
Wong RCK, Kaiser PK (1988) Design and performance evaluation of vertical shafts: rational shaft design method and verification of design method. Can Geotech J 25:320–337. doi:10.1139/t88-034
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oreste, P., Spagnoli, G. & Lo Bianco, L. A Combined Analytical and Numerical Approach for the Evaluation of Radial Loads on the Lining of Vertical Shafts. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1057–1065 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0026-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0026-6