Skip to main content
Log in

Soil and Rock Classification from High Pressure Borehole Expansion Tests

Classification des Sols et des Roches à Partir d’Essais d’Expansion Cylindrique en Haute Pression

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical and mechanical properties used to characterize soil and rock are different according to the various approaches and targets of the different activities involved, namely soil mechanics, rock mechanics or engineering geology. The Authors suggest that the data obtained during a borehole expansion test, which can be summarized by a Ménard E-modulus and a limit pressure, be used in an overall classification ranging from loose soils to hard rock without any discontinuity based on the soil Pressiorama® as developed for soils these last 10 years.

Résumé

Les propriétés physiques et mécaniques utilisées pour caractériser les sols et les roches diffèrent selon les approches et les objectifs, ceux de la géotechnique, de la géologie de l’ingénieur ou de la mécanique des roches. Les auteurs suggèrent que les mesures faites lors de l’expansion de la cavité cylindrique d’un forage, et qui peuvent se ramener aux deux paramètres fondamentaux d’un module pressiométrique et d’une pression limite, soient utilisés pour une classification passant sans discontinuité des sols aux roches fondée sur le diagramme Pressiorama® mis au point pour les sols il y a quelques années.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Bied A (2002) Etude expérimentale et modélisation du comportement des roches granulaires: écrouissage, radoucissement et rupture en mode localisé. Thèse Doct. LCPC, Paris

  • Anagnostopoulos A et al (eds) (2011) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Athens. IOS Press, Amsterdam

  • Arsonnet G, Baud J.-P, Gambin M, Heintz R (2011) HyperPac 25 MPa Fills the Gap between the Ménard Pressuremeter and the Flexible Dilatometer. In: Anagnostopoulos A (ed.) Geotechnics of Hard Soils and Weak Rocks, XV ECSMGE, Athens (in French) and in this issue, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Journal, Special Issue on Hard Soils and Weak Rocks, Springer Verlag, Berlin (in English)

  • Baud J-P (2005) Analyse des résultats pressiométriques Ménard dans un diagramme spectral [Log(pLM), Log (EM/pLM)] et utilisation des regroupements statistiques dans la modélisation d’un site. In: Gambin, Magnan, Mestat (eds) ISP5—PRESSIO 2005, vol 1. Presses ENPC, Paris, pp 167–174 [English version available from author]

  • Baud J-P, Gambin M (2013) Obtaining the Ménard α rheological factor in a Pressiorama® diagram. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013, vol 1, pp 487–490. http://www.issmge.org/images/joomd/Volume1/index.html#468

  • Baud J-P, Gambin M, Schlosser F (2012) Stress-strain hyperbolic curves with Ménard PMTs, ISC’4. In: proceedings 4th international conference on geotechnical and geophysical site characterization Porto de Galinhas, Brazil

  • Baud J-P, Gambin M, Heintz R (2013) 50 MPa Ménard PMTs help linking Soil and Rock Classifications. ISP6, Parallel session to the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013. http://www.geotech-fr.org/ressources-documentaires/congres/symposium-isp6

  • Comité Français de mécanique des roches (2000) Manuel de mécanique des roches, tome I. Presses de l’Ecole des Mines, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaporte T (2009) DMX process (rock blasting with eXpansive foam), Abattage de roche sans emploi d’explosifs. Colas-rail DVD clip and technical notice

  • Galera M, Alvarez M, Bienawski ZT (2005) Evaluation of the deformation modulus of rock masses. Comparison by pressuremeter and dilatometer test. In: Gambin, Magnan, Mestat (eds) ISP5—PRESSIO 2005, vol 2. Presses ENPC, Paris, pp 239–256

  • Gambin M (2005) Le pressiomètre. In: I. Sharour et R. Gourvès (ed) Reconnaissance des terrains in situ, Hermès Sciences—Lavoisier Chapitre 4, 104–146

  • Hurtado J (1988) Introduction à la géomécanique. Sols et structures ed, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard L (1974) Le pressiomètre éclateur de roches. Notice technique Etudes Pressiométriques Louis Ménard D23

  • Ménard L (1976) The interpretation of pressuremeter tests results. Paris. Sols-soils no. 26

  • Ménard L, Rousseau J (1962) L’évaluation des tassements, tendances nouvelles. Sols-soils 1:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Parriaux A (2009) Geology: basics for engineers, 2nd edn. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1948) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New-York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Baud.

Additional information

*Previously published in Anagnostopoulos et al. (2011). Reprinted—Published in revised form with kind permission of IOS Press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baud, JP., Gambin, M. Soil and Rock Classification from High Pressure Borehole Expansion Tests. Geotech Geol Eng 32, 1397–1403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9752-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9752-9

Keywords

Mots-clés

Navigation