Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency with different fertilizers and water management under intensive lowland rice cropping systems in Bangladesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimum nitrogen rates and methods of application increase crop productivity and farm income while reducing negative environmental effects. Field experiments were conducted during four consecutive rice growing seasons in 2012–2013 to determine the effects of different N rates and methods of fertilizer application on floodwater ammonium concentration, rice yields and N use efficiency under two water regimes: continuous standing water and alternate wetting and drying (AWD). Fertilizer treatments included the use of deep placed urea briquettes and NPK briquettes (NPK), broadcast prilled urea (PU) and a control (without N). Deep placed fertilizer treatments irrespective of N rates and water regimes reduced floodwater ammonium similar to the control treatment, while broadcast PU treatment caused floodwater ammonium to increase as N rates increased. Deep placement of fertilizer above 52 and 78 kg N ha−1 during the AusAman seasons (wet seasons) and during the Boro season (dry season), respectively, had no significant effects on grain yields but reduced N recovery. Although the differences in grain yields among deep placed and PU treatments were not significant, deep placement of 30 % less N compared to broadcast PU significantly increased N recovery (30–35 % vs. 48–55 %). AWD irrigation increased grain yield by 16 % along with increased harvest index, particularly under deep placed treatments. However, the effects of AWD on yield varied with seasons suggesting the need for long-term studies across different rice growing seasons and sites to arrive at more definitive conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam MM, Karim MR, Ladha JK (2013) Integrating best management practice for rice with farmers’ crop management techniques: a potential option for minimizing rice yield gap. Field Crops Res 144:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam MG, Mahmud JA, Ahammad KU, Gulandaz MA, Islam M (2012) Proficiency and profitability of potato as affected by urea super granule (USG) as a source of nitrogen in high Ganges river floodplain of Bangladesh. Int J Sustain Crop Prod 7:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandaogo A, Bidjokazo F, Youl S, Safo E, Abaidoo R, Andrews O (2014) Effect of fertilizer deep placement with urea supergranule on nitrogen use efficiency in Sourou Valley (Burkina Faso). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. doi:10.1007/s10705-014-9653-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai SP, Palada MC, Midmore DJ, Wu D, Salas R (2010) On-farm evaluation of fertilizer briquettes and low-cost drip irrigation for smallholder vegetable production in Cambodia. Irrig Drain 60:318–329. doi:10.1002/ird.571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman BAM, Tuong TP (2000) Field water management to save water and increases its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agr Water Manag 1615:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Gines GC, Dizon MA, Samson MI, Alcantara JM (1996) Nitrogen-use efficiency in tropical lowland rice systems: contributions from indigenous and applied nitrogen. Field Crop Res 47:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH, Prochnow LI, Cantarella H (2009) Recent development of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Adv Agron 102:267–322. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(09)01008-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong NM, Brandt KK, Sorenson J, Hung NN, Hach CV, Tan PS, Dalsgaard T (2012) Effects of alternate wetting and drying versus continuous flooding on fertilizer nitrogen fate in rice fields in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam″. Soil Biol Biochem 47:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaihre YK, Singh U, Islam SMM, Huda A, Islam MR, Satter MA, Sanabria J, Islam MdR, Shah AL (2015) Impacts of urea deep placement on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma 259–260:370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory DI, Haefele SM, Buresh RJ, Singh U (2010) Fertilizer use, markets, and management. In: Pandey, S. et al. (Eds.), Rice in the Global Economy: Strategic research and policy issues for food security. International Rice Research Institute, pp 231-263

  • Hayashi K, Nishimura S, Yagi K (2006) Ammonia volatilization from the surface of a Japanese paddy fields during rice cultivation. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:545–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K, Nishimura S, Yagi K (2008) Ammonia volatilization from a paddy field following applications of urea: rice plants are both an absorber and an emitter for atmospheric ammonia. Sci Total Environ 390:485–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huda A, Gaihre YK, Islam MR, Singh U, Islam MdR, Sanabria J, Satter MA, Afroz H, Halder A, Jahiruddin M (2016) Floodwater ammonium, nitrogen use efficiency and rice yields with fertilizer deep placement and alternate wetting and drying under tipple rice cropping systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. doi:10.1007/s10705-015-9758-6

    Google Scholar 

  • IFDC (2013) Fertilizer Deep Placement. IFDC solutions. International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 USA, p 6 http://www.ifdc.org/getattachment/1c7e9b2e-37b3-4ea4-93c1-318013dc3ce9/FDP.pdf

  • Islam MS, Rahman F, Hossain ATMS (2011) Effects of NPK briquettes on rice (Oryza sativa) in tidal flooded ecosystem. Agriculturists 9:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor V, Singh U, Patil SK, Magre H, Shrivastava LK, Mishra VN, Das RO, Samadhiya VK, Sanabria J, Diamond R (2008) Rice growth, grain yield, and floodwater nutrient dynamics as affected by nutrient placement method and rate. Agron J 100:526–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kürschner E, Henschel C, Hildebrandt T, Jülich E, Leineweber M, Paul C (2010) Water Saving in Rice Production—Dissemination, Adoption and Short TermImpacts of Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) in Bangladesh. SLE Publication Series, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, pp 96

  • Lampayan RM, Rejesus RM, Singleton RR, Bouman BAM (2015) Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Res 170:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Chen T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang J, Zhang J (2013) Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice. Field Crops Res 154:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu TQ, Fan DJ, Zhang XX, Chen J, Li CF, Cao CG (2015) Deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer reduces ammonia volatilization and increases nitrogen utilization efficiency in no-tillage paddy fields in central China. Field Crops Res 184:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah Md AM, Gaihre YK, Hunter G, Singh U, Hossain SA (2015) Fertilizer deep placement increases rice production and economic returns in southern Bangladesh. Agron J. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0170

    Google Scholar 

  • Quamruzzaman Md (2006) Integrated nutrient management for sustaining crop productivity and improvement of soil fertility in Bangladesh agriculture. In: Food and Agriculture Organization, Improving Plant Nutrient Management for Better Farmer Livelihoods, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp 257, Accessed at www.fao.org/docrep/010/ag120e/ag120e00.htm on the 29.05.2015

  • Richards M, Sander BO (2014) Alternate wetting and drying in irrigated rice. Climate-smart agriculture practice brief. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online at www.ccafs.cgiar.org

  • Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser MO, MacDonald JD, Pelster DE, Bertrand N (2013) Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention: how deep to incorporate urea?. J Environ Qual 42:1635–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savant NK, Stangel PJ (1990) Deep placement of urea supergranules in transplanted rice: principles and practices. Fert Res 25:1–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh U, Cassman KG, Ladha JK, Bronson KF (1995) Innovative nitrogen management strategies for lowland rice systems. In: Fragile lives in fragile ecosystems, pp 229–254. Proceedings of the International Rice Research Conference; 13–17 Feb 1995. International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines

  • Singh U, Patil SK, Das RO, Padilla JL, Singh VP, Pal AR (1999) Nitrogen dynamics and crop growth on an alfisol and a vertisol under rainfed lowland rice-based cropping system. Field Crop Res 61:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer SG, Schjoerring JK, Denmead OT (2004) Ammonia emission from mineral fertilizers and fertilized crops. Adv Agron 82:557–622. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(03)82008-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timsina J, Singh U, Badaruddin M, Meisner C, Amin MR (2001) Cultivar, nitrogen, and water effects on productivity, and nitrogen-use efficiency and balance for rice-wheat sequences of Bangladesh. Field Crop Res 72:143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2013) Drawing down N2O to protect climate and the ozone layer. A UNEP synthesis report. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 1–57 Available online at http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/UNEPN2Oreport/

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2014) Excess nitrogen in the environment. In: UNEP year book 2014: Emerging issues in our global environment, pp 7–11. Available online at http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2014/

  • Watanabe T, Son TT, Hung NN, Van Truong N, Giau TQ, Hayashi K, Ito O (2009) Measurement of ammonia volatilization from flooded paddy fields in Vietnam. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr 55:793–799. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00419.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Y, Liang X, Chen Y, Liu J, Gu J, Guo R, Li L (2013) Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice. Effects on dry matter accumulation, yield, water and nitrogen use. Field Crop Res 144:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) provided support for this research through the project “Accelerating Agriculture Productivity Improvement -Integrating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation into the Feed the Future Bangladesh Fertilizer Deep Placement Rice Intensification (cooperative agreement number AID-388-A-10-00002)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yam Kanta Gaihre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mofijul Islam, S.M., Gaihre, Y.K., Shah, A.L. et al. Rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency with different fertilizers and water management under intensive lowland rice cropping systems in Bangladesh. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 106, 143–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9795-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9795-9

Keywords

Navigation