We examine the prevalent use of the phrase “local realism” in the context of Bell’s Theorem and associated experiments, with a focus on the question: what exactly is the ‘realism’ in ‘local realism’ supposed to mean? Carefully surveying several possible meanings, we argue that all of them are flawed in one way or another as attempts to point out a second premise (in addition to locality) on which the Bell inequalities rest, and (hence) which might be rejected in the face of empirical data violating the inequalities. We thus suggest that the phrase ‘local realism’ should be banned from future discussions of these issues, and urge physicists to revisit the foundational questions behind Bell’s Theorem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell J.S. (2004) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maudlin T. in Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Cushing J.T. Fine A. and Goldstein S. eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996).
Zeilinger A. (2005). Nature 438: 743
Price H. (1994). Mind (New Series) 103(411): 303–336
Shimony A. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association: Symposia and Invited Papers, Vol. 1980, issue 2, pp. 572–580, 1980.
d’Espagnat B. (1979). Scientific Am. 241(5): 158–181
Rowe M.A. et al. (2001). Nature 409: 791–794
Mermin N.D. (1980). Phys. Rev. D 22: 356–361
Ferrero M., Marshall T.W., Santos E. (1990). Am. J. Phys. 58(7): 683–688
Aspect A. (1999). Nature 398: 189–190
Wikipedia entry on “Bell’s theorem,” June 9, 2006, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell’s_theorem.
Gibson J.J. (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Daumer M., Dürr D., Goldstein S., Zanghi N. (1996). Erkenntnis 45: 379–397
Mermin N.D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65(27), 3373–3376 (1990); Mermin N.D. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(3), 803–815 (1993).
Proofs of Bell’s Theorem (i.e., derivations of Bell’s inequality) which use this Naive Realist approach include Bell’s own discussion in “Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality” in Ref.1; Mermin’s derivation in “Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory,” Phys. Today, April 1985, pp. 38–47; and many other papers and textbooks including, for example, Sakurai J.J. Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1994).
T. Norsen, quant-ph/0601205, Found. Phys. Lett. 19(7), 633–655 (2006).
Clauser J.F. Horne M.A., Shimony A., Holt R.A. (1969). Phys. Rev. Lett. 23: 880
Norsen T. “Counter-factual meaningfulness and the Bell and CHSH inequalities,” quant-ph/0606084.
Boyd R. “Scientific realism” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/
For a detailed philosophical defense of Perceptual Realism, see Kelley D. The Evidence of the Senses: A Realist Theory of Perception (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, 1986).
Albert D., Loewer B. (1988). Synthese 77: 195–213
The clearest philosophical work on the Many Worlds Interpretation has been done by David Albert. For a more systematic discussion of the claim that MWI necessitates a rejection of Perceptual Realism, see Albert D. Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
This point is mentioned also in David Albert, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, op cit.
Chiao R., Garrison J. (1999). Found. Phys. 29: 553–560
Peikoff L. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand (Dutton, New York, 1991), pp. 129–141.
M. Smerlak and Rovelli C. “Relational EPR,” quant-ph/0604064.
A. D. Sokal, Lingua Franca 62–64 (1996).
I. Born, trans., The Born–Einstein Letters (Walker, New York, 1971).
N.D. Mermin Phys. Today, April 1985, pp. 38–47.
For a recent attempt to clarify and revive the EPR argument, see Norsen T. Am. J. Phys. 73(2), 164–176 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norsen, T. Against ‘Realism’. Found Phys 37, 311–340 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9104-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9104-1