Wheeler J.A., Zurek W.H. (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935). Phys. Rev 47:777CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
E. Schrödinger, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935); ibid
32, 446 (1936).
Selleri F., van der Merwe A. (1990). Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht See also references therein.MATHGoogle Scholar
N. Bohr, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934); Atomic Theory and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958).
W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (Dover, New York, 1930); Physics and Philosophy, (Harper and Row, NY, 1958).
D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952); ibid, 85, 180 (1952).
Everett H. III. (1957). Rev. Mod. Phys 29:463CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
Ballentine L.E. (1970). Rev. Mod. Phys 42:358MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
Bell J.S., Aspect A. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
van der Merwe A., Selleri F., Tarozzi G. Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, Eds., Vols I and II (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).
H. P. Stapp, Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003); H. P. Stapp, Found. Phys. 10, 767 (1980).
Schwartz J.M., Stapp H.P., Beauregard M. Phil. Trans. R Soc
. B 360
(1458), 1306 (2005).Google Scholar
E. Schrödinger, What is Life? And Mind and Matter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967). Studying the entire book is strongly recommended and in particular Chap. 3, p. 126 and Chap. 4, p. 139.
Schrödinger E. (1954). Nature and the Greeks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
E. P. Wigner, “Quantum Theory and Measurement,” in J. A. Wheeler, and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), pp. 260 and 325.
J. Von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Chap. VI (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955), p. 417.
F. London and E. Bauer, “Quantum Theory and Measurement,” in J. A. Wheeler, and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), p. 217.
W. Pauli and C. G. Jung, Atom and the Archetype, Pauli/Jung, Letters, 1932–1958. C. A. Meier, ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001).
R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989); The Shadows of the Mind (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
Mavromatos N.E., Nanopoulos D.V. (1998). Int. J. Mod. Phys B 12:517CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
Pöppel E. Trends Cognit Sci.
:56–61 (1997).Google Scholar
Aristotle, Posterior Analytics II 19, 99b28-29:
I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (1781), see translation in English by P. Max Müller (Anchor books, New York, 1966).
B. Spinoza, Ethics; edited and translated by G. H. R. Parkinson (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000).
Whitehead A.N. (1933). Adventures of Ideas. Macmillan, New York, p. 228Google Scholar
C. G. Jung, Psychological Types, p. 567 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971); C. G. Jung, The Integration of the Personality (Farrar and Rinehart, New York, 1939); C. G. Jung, Psychology of the Unconscious (Dodd, New York, 1916).
The idea of something “potentially existing” was discussed by Aristotle, see, e.g., Physics, 186a1-3. This can be translated as follows: “..., because the one exists in potentia and in actuality.”
Parmenides, On Nature, Pre-Socratic Greek Philosopher, born in 510 B.C. See The Fragments of Parmenides, A. H. Coxon (Assen, Netherlands, 1986). See also Ref. .
Parmenides, Presented by Plato, p. 920, Ref. .
Plato, “Collected Dialogs”, eds. E. Hamilton and H. Cairns, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1980).
S. Vivekananda, The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Mayavati memorial edn. (Advaita Ashrama, Calcutta, 1965).
Krishnamurti J., Bohm D. (1985). The Ending of Time. Gollancz, LondonGoogle Scholar
We postulate that the seat of consciousness cannot be matter-energy itself because matter is itself an experience of consciousness; namely the experience of matter is given us posteriori but that which perceives matter, that which has the experience, must be ready for the experience to occur a priori.(24)
E. Webb, Philosophers of Consciousness, Chapter 2, “B. Lonergan, Consciousness as experience and operation” (University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1988), p. 53.
The original meaning of the Greek word “phenomenon” is “appearance”, namely, that which appears in consciousness.
When a sentient being is examined to study “his” consciousness using all presently available instrumentation, the being is turned into an object (See Ref. , Chapter 3, “The principle of objectivation”). Subject is the experience of oneself. For example, if we follow the nerve excitation caused by the molecules of a flower which interact with those of his nose we will never “see” or experience the aroma. All we will be able to see is the electromagnetic imprint, the pointer which ultimately the subject experiences. Some people are inclined to think that this is not the final stage, that somehow another part of the brain has looked at this imprint and interpreted it. However, we have already included this, namely, the imprint we are considering is the one produced in the brain after this process, namely, it is the collective neural excitations including the neurons that process all the series of signals and their translations to other signals. See also, Ref. , Chapter 6, “The mystery of the sensual qualities”.
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, J. Physiol. 148, 574–591 (1959).
Hubel D.H. (1995). Eye, Brain, and Vision. Scientific American Library Series, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Eccles J.C. (1994). How the Self Controls its Brain. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Rieke F., Baylor D.A. (1998). Rev. Mod. Phys 70:1027CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
Yau K.-W., Baylor D.A. (1989). Ann. Rev. Neurosci 12:289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
A. K. Engel, P. Konig, A. K. Kreiter, T. B. Schillen, and W. Singer, Trends Neurosci. 15, 218 (1992); C. M. Gray, J. Comput. Neurosci. 1, 11 (1994); P. Fries, J.-H Schöder, P. R. Roelfsema, W. Singer, and A. K. Engerl, J. Neurosci. 22, 3739 (2002).
Baker C.L. Jr., Cynader M.S. (1986). J. Neurophysiol 55(6):1136PubMedGoogle Scholar
A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982); ibid, 47, 460 (1981); A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature
390, 575 (1997). D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(6), 1121–1125 (1998); I. Marcikic et al., Nature
421, 509 (2003); M. Riebe et al., Nature
429, 734 (2004); M. D. Barrett et al., Nature
429, 737 (2004).
Bohm D. (1979). Quantum Mechanics. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar