Skip to main content
Log in

On the Persistence of Particles

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This paper is about the metaphysical debate whether objects persist over time by the selfsame object existing at different times (nowadays called “endurance” by metaphysicians), or by different temporal parts, or stages, existing at different times (called “perdurance”). I aim to illuminate the debate by using some elementary kinematics and real analysis: resources which metaphysicians have, surprisingly, not availed themselves of. There are two main results, which are of interest to both endurantists and perdurantists.

(1) I describe a precise formal equivalence between the way that the two metaphysical positions represent the motion of the objects of classical mechanics (both point-particles and continua).

(2) I make precise, and prove a result about, the idea that the persistence of objects moving in a void is to be analysed in terms of tracking the continuous curves in spacetime that connect points occupied by matter. The result is entirely elementary: it is a corollary of the Heine–Borel theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Hawley (2001) How Things Persist Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Sider (2001) Four-Dimensionalism Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Butterfield, (2004a), “On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter”,; available online at: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0406021; and at the Pittsburgh archive: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001760.

  4. J. Butterfield, (2004b), “Classical mechanics is not pointilliste, and can be perdurantist”, in preparation.

  5. S. Kripke, “Is There a Problem About Substitutional Quantification?”, in Truth and Meaning, G. Evans and J. McDowell, eds. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1976, reprinted 1999).

  6. J. Cushing (1994) Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and Copenhagen Hegemony Chicago University Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Cushing (1998) Philosophical Concepts in Physics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Butterfield, Philos. Quart.35, 32--44 (1985); reprinted in H. Noonan ed. Identity (Dartmouth Publishing, Brookfield Vermont, 1993

  9. D. Lewis (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Haslanger (1994) Australas. J. Philos. 72 339–359

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Johnston, Aristotelian Soc. Suppl. Vol. 61, 107–135 (1987); reprinted in H. Noonan ed. Identity (Dartmouth Publishing, Brookfield (Vermont), 1993).

  12. D. H. Mellor (1998) Real Time II Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Rea (1998) Philos. Rev. 107 225–260

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Balashov (1999) Nous 33 644–662

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Lewis, Analysis 48, 65–72 (1988); reprinted in H. Noonan, ed. Identity (Dartmouth Publishing, Brookfield (Vermont), 1993).

  16. D. Lewis (1999) Australas. J. Philos. 209 212

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Robinson (1982) Philos. Rev. 91 317–341

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Zimmermann (1997) Philos. Perspect 11 433–471

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hitchcock (2003) Br. J. Philos. Sci. 54 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Dowe (2000) Physical Causation Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Bell, “The Measurement Theory of Everett and de Broglie’s Pilot Wave”, in Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality and Particles, M. Flato et al., eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 11–17. Reprinted in Bell (1987); page references to reprint.

  22. J. Bell, “Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists”, in Quantum Gravity II, C. Isham, R.Penrose and D. Sciama, eds. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981), pp. 611–637. Reprinted in Bell (1987); page references to reprint.

  23. J. Butterfield, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 53, 289–330 (2002); available online at: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0103055; and at the Pittsburgh archive: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000104.

  24. Z. Xia (1992) Ann. Math. 135 411–468

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Diacu P. Holmes (1996) Celestial Encounters Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Apostol (1974), Mathematical Analysis, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, 1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Butterfield.

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Jim Cushing, an amazing mind and a wonderful man.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butterfield, J. On the Persistence of Particles. Found Phys 35, 233–269 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1943-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-004-1943-4

Keywords

Navigation