Abstract
Although to live is to face problems, the general concept of a problem has been significantly understudied. So much so, that the publication of Polya’s delightful How to Solve It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1945) caused quite a stir. And, although the concept of a conceptual problem is philosophical because it is deep and occurs across fields, from mathematics to politics, no philosophers have produced any memorable studies of it. Moreover, the word ‘problem’ is absent from most philosophical reference works. There are plenty of texts on particular problems such as those of evil and induction, but none on the general concept of a conceptual problem—as if it were not a problematic concept. Worse, we are seldom told that doing original mathematics, science or technology is to wrestle with original problems. Nor have we been told that the hardest problems are likely to be inverse, in that they go from effect to cause, or from sketch to implementation, or from conclusion to premises—as in diagnosing disease from symptoms, looking for a westward passage from Europe to Asia, and designing public policies to attack social issues. The existence of this significant gap in the philosophical literature justifies the publication of the present study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asimov, I. (1981). The role of the heretic. In D. Goldsmith (Ed.), Scientists confront Velikovsky. New York: W.W. Norton.
Bunge, M. (1945). Neutron–proton scattering at 8.8 and 13 MeV. Nature, 156, 301.
Bunge, M. (1959a). Causality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bunge, M. (1959b). ¿Qué es un problema científico? Holmbergia (Buenos Aires) VI, 15, 47–63.
Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific research, chapter 1. Berlin, NY: Springer.
Bunge, M. (1998). Scientific research (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bunge, M. (2006). Chasing reality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bunge, M. (2016). Modes of existence. Review of Metaphysics, 70, 225–234.
Bunge, M. (2017). From a scientific point of view. Tyndall: Cambridge Scholars.
Chomsky, N. (2009). The mysteries of nature. Journal of Philosophy, 106, 167–200.
de la Peña, L., Cetto, A. M., & Valdés-Hernández, A. (2015). The emerging quantum: The physics behind quantum mechanics. Cham: Springer.
Duhem, P. (1914). La théorie physique, son objet et sa structure. Lyon: Marcel Rivière.
Hall, R. L. (1995). Geometric spectral inversion. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 28, 1771–1786.
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to phenomenology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leibniz, G. (1921). [1765]. Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain. Paris: Flammarion.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1954). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Volume 1: Preface. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Russell, B. (1919). An introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.
Sanchez-Langelin, B., & Aspu-Guzik, A. (2018). Inverse molecular design using machine learning. Science, 361, 360–365.
Schlosshauer, M. (Ed.). (2011). Elegance and enigma: The quantum interviews. Heidelberg: Springer.
Sun, R. (2008). The cambridge handbook of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tarski, A. (1956/1933). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In J. H. Woodger (Ed. & Trans.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers From 1923–1928 by Alfred Tarski. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tarski, A. (1944). The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 341–376.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. London: Macmillan.
Wolin, S. (2008). Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zeilinger, A. (2010). [2005]. Dance of the photons. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunge, M. Inverse Problems. Found Sci 24, 483–525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-09577-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-09577-1