Skip to main content
Log in

Mario Bunge on Gravitational Waves and the Reality of Spacetime

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I discuss the recent claims made by Mario Bunge on the philosophical implications of the discovery of gravitational waves. I think that Bunge is right when he points out that the detection implies the materiality of spacetime, but I reject his identification of spacetime with the gravitational field. I show that Bunge’s analysis of the spacetime inside a hollow sphere is defective, but this in no way affects his main claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For Bunge, an entity is material if it can change. Material objects, contrary to mere concepts, are changeable and can trigger changes in other objects.

  2. Spacetime is a 4-dimensional entity. This means that in 4-dimensions spacetime does not change. What we call changes are asymmetries in 3D slices of a 4 dimensional object (see Romero 2013). In order to achieve full consistency, Bunge should abandon the last residuum of relationism in his ontology and seriously consider whether ontological realism about spacetime is compatible with another cherished metaphysical doctrine: presentism. I have argued extensively against presentism elsewhere (Romero 2015, 2017).

References

  • Abbott, B. P. [LIGO Collaboration]. (2016). Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Letters, 116, 061102.

  • Bunge, M. (1967). Foundations of physics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1974a). Semantics I: Sense and reference. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1974b). Semantics II: Meaning and interpretation. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise of basic philosophy. Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1920). Ether and the theory of relativity. In: Renn, J. and Schemmel, M. (Eds.), (2007) The genesis of general relativity vol. 3: Gravitation in the twilight of classical physics (pp. 613–619). Berlin: Springer.

  • Romero, G. E. (2013). From change to spacetime: An Eleatic journey. Foundations of Science, 18, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, G. E. (2015). Present time. Foundations of Science, 20, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, G. E. (2017). On the ontology of spacetime: Substantivalism, relationism, eternalism, and emergence. Foundations of Science, 22, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeenk, C. (2014). Einstein’s role in the creation of relativistic cosmology. In M. Janssen & C. Lehner (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Einstein (pp. 228–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Mario Bunge for stimulating discussions. My research on gravitation is supported by Grant PIP 0338 (CONICET) and Grant AYA2016-76012-C3-1-P (Ministro de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, España).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo E. Romero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romero, G.E. Mario Bunge on Gravitational Waves and the Reality of Spacetime. Found Sci 23, 405–409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9529-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9529-8

Keywords

Navigation