God May Not Play Dice, But Human Observers Surely Do Article First Online: 22 March 2014 DOI :
10.1007/s10699-014-9352-4

Cite this article as: Sassoli de Bianchi, M. Found Sci (2015) 20: 77. doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9352-4
3
Citations
160
Downloads
Abstract We investigate indeterminism in physical observations. For this, we introduce a distinction between genuinely indeterministic (creation-1 and discovery-1 ) observational processes, and fully deterministic (creation-2 and discovery-2 ) observational processes, which we analyze by drawing a parallel between the localization properties of microscopic entities, like electrons, and the lateralization properties of macroscopic entities, like simple elastic bands. We show that by removing the randomness incorporated in certain of our observational processes, acquiring over them a better control, we also alter these processes in such a radical way that in the end they do not correspond anymore to the observation of the same property. We thus conclude that a certain amount of indeterminism must be accepted and welcomed in our physical observations, as we cannot get rid of it without also diminishing our discriminative power. We also provide in our analysis some elements of clarification regarding the non-spatial nature of microscopic entities, which we illustrate by using an analogy with the process of objectification of human concepts. Finally, the important notion of relational properties is properly defined, and the role played by indeterminism in their characterization clarified.

Keywords Observation Quantum measurement Creation Discovery Quantum probabilities Localization Non-spatiality Control Concepts Relational properties

References Aerts, D. (1982). Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics.

Foundations of Physics ,

12 , 1131–1170.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1984). The missing element of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the EPR paradox situation.

Helvetica Physica Acta ,

57 , 421–428.

Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1986). A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics.

Journal of Mathematical Physics ,

27 , 202–210.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1994). Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability.

Foundations of Physics ,

24 , 1227.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1995). Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature.

International Journal of Theoretical Physics ,

34 , 1165.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1998). The entity and modern physics: The creation-discovery view of reality. In E. Castellani (Ed.),

Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Google Scholar Aerts, D., et al. (1990). An attempt to imagine parts of the reality of the micro-world. In J. Mizerski (Ed.),

Problems in quantum physics II; Gdansk ’89 (pp. 3–25). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

Google Scholar Aerts, D. (1999a). The stuff the world is made of: Physics and reality. In D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, E. Mathijs (eds.) The white book of ‘Einstein meets magritte’ (pp. 129–183). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 274.

Aerts, D. (1999b). Quantum mechanics: Structures, axioms and paradoxes. In D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, E. Mathijs (eds.) The indigo book of ‘Einstein meets magritte’ (pp. 141–205). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 239.

Aerts, D. (2002a). Being and change: Foundations of a realistic operational formalism. In Probing the structure of quantum mechanics: Nonlinearity, nonlocality, computation and axiomatics (pp. 71–110). World Scientific, Singapore, p. 394.

Aerts, D. (2002b). Reality and probability: Introducing a new type of probability calculus. In Probing the structure of quantum mechanics: Nonlinearity, nonlocality, computation and axiomatics (pp. 205–229). World Scientific, Singapore, p. 394.

Aerts, D. (2009). Quantum particles as conceptual entities: A possible explanatory framework for quantum theory.

Foundations of Science ,

14 , 361–411.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (2010a). Interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities.

International Journal of Theoretical Physics ,

49 , 2950–2970.

CrossRef Google Scholar Aerts, D. (2010b). A potentiality and conceptuality interpretation of quantum physics.

Philosophica ,

83 , 15–52.

Google Scholar Aerts, D. (2011).

Quantum theory and conceptuality: Matter, stories, sematics and space–time .

arXiv:1110.4766 [quant-ph].

Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014a).

The unreasonable success of quantum probability I: Quantum measurements as uniform measurements .

arXiv:1401.2647 [quant-ph].

Aerts, D., & Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2014b).

The unreasonable success of quantum probability II: Quantum measurements as universal measurements .

arXiv:1401.2650 [quant-ph].

Baltag, A., & Smets, S. (2011). Quantum logic as a dynamic logic.

Synthese ,

179 , 285–306.

CrossRef Google Scholar Coecke, B. (1998). A representation for compound quantum systems as individual entities: Hard acts of creation and hidden correlations.

Foundations of Physics ,

28 , 1109–1135.

CrossRef Google Scholar Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2011). Ephemeral properties and the illusion of microscopic particles.

Foundations of Science ,

16 (4), 393–409.

Google Scholar Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2012). From permanence to total availability: A quantum conceptual upgrade. Foundations of Science, 17 (3), 223–244.

Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2013a). The \(\delta \) -quantum machine, the \(k\) -model, and the non-ordinary spatiality of quantum entities. Foundations of Science, 18 (1), 11–41.

Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2013b). The observer effect. Foundations of Science, 18 (2), 213–243.

Gomatam, R. V. (1999). Quantum theory and the observation problem.

Journal of Consciousness Studies ,

6 (11–12), 173–190.

Google Scholar Piron, C. (1990). Mécanique quantique. Bases et applications. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne (Second corrected edition 1998), First Edition.

Piron, C. (1976).

Foundations of quantum physics . Massachusetts: W. A. Benjamin Inc.

Google Scholar Piron, C. (1978). La Description d’un Système Physique et le Présupposé de la Théorie Classique.

Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie ,

3 , 131–152.

Google Scholar Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics.

International Journal of Theoretical Physics ,

35 , 1637.

CrossRef Google Scholar © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations 1. Laboratorio di Autoricerca di Base Lugano Switzerland