Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Philosophical Issues and their Implications for the Systems Architect

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many system architects select their system methodologies without explicit consideration of the philosophical perspectives that impact their decisions. This paper describes how the concepts of ontology and epistemology apply in systems science. Ontology is how we specify terms of reference for existence, allowing us to understand the theory of existence via an ‘existence framework’. Epistemology, the theory of knowledge, allows us to explore new models and theories of knowledge acquisition so the best system-based methodologies can be deployed to solve complex system problems. After introducing these concepts, the paper presents system science issues and assesses the impact of ontological, axiological and epistemological perspectives on system methodology selection, research, system design and deployment. An ontological viewpoint such as realism, as an objective view is contrasted versus nationalism, a personal perceptional view. An epistemological viewpoint is explored comparing knowledge as a product of sensory perception or rational reflection. The paper’s significant contribution is that it helps system architects understand that their philosophical views of systems science impact their system methodology choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.). (2000). Houghton Mifflin Company. (http://www.dictionary.com).

  • Baker, E. H. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable: The usual ways of measuring IT’s contribution to productivity growth are breaking down in the complexity of the information age. CIO Insight, 1(77).

  • Bearden D.A. (2003) A complexity-based risk assessment of low-cost planetary missions: when is a mission too fast & too cheap?. Acta Astronautica 52(2): 371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies, (p. 8). NY: Basic Books, Inc.

  • Comfort L.K., Haase T.W. (2006) Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Management and Policy 10(4): 328–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricky, B. (1998). Systems engineering and analysis (p. 7). NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2004). National response plan. Washington DC: Department of Homeland Security.

  • Gross, D. (2005). Productivity is up or down. Pick your statistic. New York Times, August 21, 2005.

  • Hearnshaw H.M., Harker R.M., Cheater F.M., Baker R.H., Grimshaw G.M. (2003) Are audits wasting resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review criteria. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12: 24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. (1999) Computer age gains respect of economists. New York Times, April 14, 1999.

  • Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W. III (1972) Limits to growth. Universe Book, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Metaphysics (2001). http://www.philosophyclass.com.

  • Potter, J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods, (p. 36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Sarsfield L.P. (2003) The cosmos on a shoestring: Small spacecraft for space and Earth Science. RAND Corporation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallich, H. C. (1972). More on growth. Newsweek, March 13, 1972, p. 86.

  • Williams, R. (2007). Counterinsurgency tactics tested. The News-Enterprise. http://www.thenewsenterprise.com/.

  • Wilmer, M. (2006). Good decision support through capabilities based assessments and analyses of alternatives (pp. 2–8). Ft. Monroe, VA: Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Analysis.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deputy, Studies and Analysis Division, Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC), Fort Monroe, 23651, VA, USA

    Barry Charles Ezell

  2. Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400747, 151 Engineer’s way, Charlottesville, 22904, VA, USA

    Kenneth G. Crowther

Authors
  1. Barry Charles Ezell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth G. Crowther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Charles Ezell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ezell, B.C., Crowther, K.G. Philosophical Issues and their Implications for the Systems Architect. Found Sci 12, 269–276 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-007-9108-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-007-9108-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation