Abstract
Over the last two hundred years, there have been many occasions where the name of a newly-discovered element has provoked controversy and dissent but in modern times, the naming of elements after scientists has proved to be particularly contentious. Here we recount the threads of this story, predominantly through discourses in the popular scientific journals, the first major discussion on naming an element after a scientist (Moseley); the first definitive naming after a scientist (Curie); and the first naming after a living scientist (Seaborg).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon: Scientific events: moseleyum and the names of elements. Science 61, 510 (1925)
Anon: Discovery of the transfermium elements. Chem. Int. 16, 16–17 (1994)
Anon: Naming the transfermium elements. Chem. Int. 17, 3–5 (1995)
Anon: IUPAC proposes names for transfermium elements. Chem. Int. 19, 68–69 (1997)
Anon: Seaborgium: element 106 named in honor of Glenn T. Seaborg, LBL’s Associate Director at large. LBL Research Review, August 1994, available at: http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Research-Review/Magazine/1994/seaborgium-mag.html Cited 9 March 2007
Bosenquet, C., Keeley, C.: Note on a search for the missing element no. 43. Phil. Mag. Ser. 6 48, 154–157 (1924)
Brown, S.S.: History of IUPAC 1988–1999, IUPAC (2001)
Dagani, R.: Heavy-element nomenclature: ACS panel rejects names chosen by IUPAC. Chem. Eng. News. 72, 8 (21 November 1994a)
Dagani, R.: Shuffling of heavy-element names by IUPAC panel provokes outcries. Chem. Eng. News. 72, 8 (5 December 1994b)
Fennell, R.W.: History of IUPAC 1919–1987. Blackwell Science (1994)
Fernelius, W.C., Loening, K., Adams, R.M.: Notes on nomenclature: names for elements. J. Chem. Educ. 52, 583–584 (1975)
Freemantle, M.: Heavy-element name saga ends. Chem. Eng. News. 75, 9–10 (8 September 1997)
Freemantle, M., Dagani, R.: Heaviest elements named: IUPAC rejects ‘seaborgium’ for element 106. Chem. Eng. News. 72, 4–5 (10 October 1994)
Hamer, R.: Moseleyum. Science 61, 208–209 (1925)
Heilbron, J.L.: H. G. J. Moseley. University of California Press, Berkeley (1974)
Huheey, J.E.: Heavy-element nomenclature. Chem. Eng. News. 73, 4 (16 January 1995)
Kaesz, H.: The synthesis and naming of elements 110 and beyond. Chem. Int. 24(2), http://www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2002/2402/elements110.html Cited 23 September 2007
Koppenol, W.: H. Paneth, IUPAC, and the naming of elements. Helvetica Chimica Acta 88, 95–99 (2005)
Masson, I.: Letter to the editor. Nature 137, 545 (1925)
Paneth, F.A.: The making of the missing chemical elements. Nature 159, 8–10 (1947)
Seaborg, G.T., Seaborg, E.: Adventures in the atomic age: from Watts to Washington, p. 254. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2001),
Tripathi, S.K.: Heavy-element nomenclature. Chem. Eng. News 73, 5 (16 January 1995)
van der Krogt, P.: Elementymology & elements multidict: names that did not make it. http://www.elements.vanderkrogt.net/didnot_index.html Cited 9 March 2007
Weeks, M.E., Leicester, H.M.: Discovery of the chemical elements (7th ed.). J. Chem. Educ., pp. 820–823. Easton, PA (1968), together with the cited references 16 and 24, p. 828
Zamaraev, K.I.: IUPAC recommendations on names and symbols of transfermium elements. Chem. Int. 18, 34 (1996)
Zingales, R.: From masurium to trinacrium: the troubled story of element 43. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 221–227 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayner-Canham, G., Zheng, Z. Naming elements after scientists: an account of a controversy. Found Chem 10, 13–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9042-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9042-1