Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized allocation of straddle carriers to reduce overall delays at multimodal container terminals

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased global container trade and strong competition are boosting the need for efficient container terminals. Using internal transport resources efficiently reduces transfer times and operating costs. This article addresses the allocation of straddle carriers at a tactical level at intermodal container terminals via optimization and simulation. Our objective is to reduce overall delays at the terminal—with special focus on delays of inland transport modes (rail, road and waterway). We introduce a notation to describe different service strategies and delay criteria and analyze the complexity of different service strategies. A generic mixed integer linear program—that can be easily adapted to different service strategies—models the allocation problem based on a network flow representation of the terminal. We conduct a case study for a container terminal at the Grand Port Maritime de Marseille to evaluate the proposed allocation: we adapt the optimization model to the specific terminal, implement a discrete event simulation model and conduct experiments on actual data. Results show that the allocation proposed by the optimization model reduces delays at the terminal and performs well in a stochastic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessandri A, Cervellera C, Cuneo M, Gaggero M (2008a) Nonlinear predictive control for the management of container flows in maritime intermodal terminals. In: Proceedings of the 47th IEEE conference on decision and control, December 9–11, Cancún, Mexico, pp 2800–2805

  • Alessandri A, Cervellera C, Cuneo M, Gaggero M, Soncin G (2008b) Modeling and feedback control for resource allocation and performance analysis in container terminals. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 9:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeloudis P, Bell MGH (2011) A review of container terminal simulation models. Marit Policy Manag 38:523–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bish EK, Chen FY, Leong YT, Nelson BL, Ng JWC, Simchi-Levi D (2005) Dispatching vehicles in a mega container terminal. OR Spectr 27:491–506

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Briskorn D, Drexl A, Hartmann S (2006) Inventory-based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals. OR Spectr 28:611–630

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brucker P, Knust S. (n.d.) The scheduling zoo—a searchable bibliography on scheduling. http://www.desir.lip6.fr/~durrc/query/

  • Cao JX, Lee DH, Chen JH, Shi Q (2010) The integrated yard truck and yard crane scheduling problem: Benders’ decomposition-based methods. Transp Res Part E 46:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Bostel N, Dejax P, Cai J, Xi L (2007) A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal. Eur J Oper Res 181:40–58

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Spasovic L (2003) Scheduling material handling vehicles in a container terminal. Prod Plan Control 14:623–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauzére-Pérés S, Rouquet A, Reynaud C, Zehendner E (2012) Conception et validation d’un outil de prévision des flux routiers d’un terminal portuaire à conteneur. Congrés ATEC-ITS, Versailles, France

  • Gambardella LM, Bontempi G, Taillard E, Romanengo D, Raso G, Piermari P (1996) Simulation and forecasting in intermodal container terminal. Proceedings of the 8th European simulation symposium, SCS International, Ghent, Belgium, pp 626–630

  • Gambardella LM, Rizzoli AE, Zaffalon M (1998) Simulation and planning of an intermodal container terminal. Simulation 71:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella LM, Mastrolilli M, Rizzoli AE, Zaffalon M (2001) An optimization methodology for intermodal terminal management. J Intell Manuf 12:521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham R, Lawler E, Lenstra J, Kan AR (1979) Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling theory: a survey. Ann Discret Math 5:287–326

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann S (2004) A general framework for scheduling equipment and manpower at container terminals. OR Spectr 26:51–74

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Medina JC, Ouyang Y (2008) Optimal operations of transportation fleet for unloading activities at container ports. Transp Res Part B 42:970–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozan E (2000) Optimising container transfers at multimodal terminals. Math Comput Model 31:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau HY, Zhao Y (2008) Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 112:665–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans PJ, Wagelmans AP (2001) Dynamic scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2001-69-LIS

  • Notteboom T, Winkelmans W (2004) Factual report on the European port sector. Report commissioned by European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO)

  • Vis IF, de Koster R, Savelsbergh MWP (2005) Minimum vehicle fleet size under time-window constraints at a container terminal. Transp Sci 39:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work has been conducted within the ESPRIT Project, financed by the Mission Transports Intelligents of the DGITM (Direction Générale des Infrastructures, des Transports et de la Mer) of the MEEDDM (Ministére de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement Durable et de la Mer). The authors would like to thank Christophe Reynaud from Marseille Gyptis International for his precious advice. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their thorough reviews and their helpful suggestions that made it possible to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Zehendner.

Appendix: Estimation of truck arrivals

Appendix: Estimation of truck arrivals

This section presents a mechanism to forecast the number of export containers arriving by truck on a daily basis. This mechanism was developed within the ESPRIT project whose objective was to improve operations within the terminal based on reliable forecasts on the the number of container movements. We developed and tested an adapted version of the forecast mechanism presented by Gambardella et al. (1996).

Historic data reports for each export container arriving per truck, when it arrived at the terminal, on which vessel it was loaded and the planned departure of the vessel. Based on this data, we determine the average percentage on the total number of containers per vessel that arrive each day before the planned departure of the vessel (Fig. 6). To compute the number of export containers for a given day, we use information on announced arrivals of vessels and estimates on their volumes. For each vessel arriving in the next 14 days, we multiply the percentage with the volume of the vessel. The forecast equals the sum over all vessels. To determine the number of trucks per hour, we determine the average distribution of the workload over a working day (Fig. 7) and multiply it with the forecasted volume for the entire day.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Distribution of container arrivals with regard to the planned arrival of a vessel

Fig. 7
figure 7

Distribution of arriving containers over the day

We evaluated the quality of the forecast mechanism for a terminal at the Grand Port Maritime de Marseille. A prototype computed the estimates for the next two to three days based on historic data and announced vessels. Figure 8 presents the daily gap between the forecast and the realized entries of export container via trucks. The tests started in March 2011. We used data from March and April to calibrate the model and started forecasting in May. For most of the forecasts (around 85 %) the gap is smaller than 20 %, around 55 % of the forecasts do not exceed the gap of 10 % required by the terminal. All gaps above 40 % are due to postponed arrivals of vessels or by perturbations within the terminal.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Gap between the forecast and the realized entries of export container via trucks

The prototype may be improved by including more information, e.g., the day of the week, already arrived containers, time and not only day of a vessels arrival. The terminal operator can also use his specific knowledge on the situation at the terminal to adjust the forecast. The same mechanism may also be used to forecast daily volumes for import containers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zehendner, E., Rodriguez-Verjan, G., Absi, N. et al. Optimized allocation of straddle carriers to reduce overall delays at multimodal container terminals. Flex Serv Manuf J 27, 300–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-013-9188-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-013-9188-1

Keywords

Navigation