Abstract
Making production decisions that will reduce total cost is a goal that most manufacturers pursue actively. However, the traditional production model development assumed that all products are perfect quality, which is far from reality. Since trade credit is a popular payment method in today’s business environment, this paper analyzes the production problem under trade credit and imperfect product reworking conditions. This work extends the traditional production model by considering reworking imperfect items and trade credit to cope with realistic situations. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal production lot size while minimizing the total cost. This paper develops an easy-to-use algorithm to solve the problem described, provides numerical examples to illustrate the proposed solution procedure, and discusses the impact of various system parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan WM, Ibrahim RN, Lochert PB (2003) A new EPQ model: integrating lower pricing, rework and reject situations. Prod Plan Control 14(7):588–595
Chiu YP (2003) Determining the optimal lot size for the finite production model with random defective rate, the rework process, and backlogging. Eng Optim 35(4):427–437
Chiu SW (2007) Optimal replenishment policy for imperfect quality EMQ model with rework and backlogging. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 23:165–178
Chiu SW (2008) An optimization problem of manufacturing systems with stochastic machine breakdown and rework process. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 24:203–219
Chiu SW, Gong DC, Wee HM (2004) Effects of random defective rate and imperfect rework process on economic production quantity model. Jpn J Ind Appl Math 21(3):375–389
Chiu TSP, Lin HD, Cheng FT (2006) Optimal production lot sizing with backlogging, random defective rate, and rework derived without derivatives. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 220(9):1559–1563
Chung KJ, Huang YF (2003) The optimal cycle time for EPQ inventory model under permissible delay in payments. Int J Prod Econ 84:307–318
Chung KJ, Huang YF (2006) Retailer’s optimal cycle times in the EOQ model with imperfect quality and a permissible credit period. Qual Quant 40:59–77
Goyal SK (1985) Economics order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. J Oper Res Soc 36:335–338
Hayek PA, Salameh MK (2001) Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Prod Plan Control 12(6):584–590
Huang YF (2003) Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing. J Oper Res Soc 54:1011–1015
Huang YF (2006) An inventory model under two levels of trade credit and limited storage space derived without derivatives. Appl Mathematical Modeling 30:418–436
Huang YF (2007) Optimal retailer’s replenishment decisions in the EPQ model under two levels of trade credit policy. Eur J Oper Res 176:1577–1591
Huang YF, Chung KJ (2003) Optimal replenishment and payment policies in the EOQ model under cash discount and trade credit. Asia-Pac J Operational Res 20:177–190
Konstantaras I, Goyal SK, Papachristos S (2007) Economic ordering policy for an item with imperfect quality subject to the in-house inspection. Int J Syst Sci 38(6):473–482
Liao JJ (2008) An EOQ model with noninstantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items under two-level trade credit. Int J Prod Econ 113:852–861
Liu JJ, Yang P (1996) Optimal lot-sizing in an imperfect production system with homogeneous reworkable jobs. Eur J Oper Res 91:517–527
Osteryoung S, Nosari E, McCarty DE, Reinhar WJ (1986) Use of the EOQ Model for Inventory Analysis. Prod Inventory Manag J 27:39–46
Ouyang LY, Chang CT, Teng JT (2005) An EOQ model for deteriorating items under trade credits. J Oper Res Soc 56:719–726
Ouyang LY, Wu KS, Yang CT (2006) An study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating item with permissible delay in payments. Comput Ind Eng 51:637–651
Ouyang LY, Ho CH, Su CH (2008) Optimal strategy for an integrated system with variable production rate when the freight rate and trade credit are both linked to the order quantity. Int J Prod Econ 115:151–162
Ouyang LY, Teng JT, Goyal SK, Yang CT (2009) An economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity. Eur J Oper Res 194:418–431
Sheen GJ, Tsao YC (2007) Channel coordination, trade credit and quantity discounts for freight cost. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 43:112–128
Teng JT (2002) On the economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. J Oper Res Soc 53:915–918
Teng JT (2009) Optimal ordering policies for a retailer who offers distinct trade credits to its good and bad credit customers. Int J Prod Econ 119:415–423
Teng JT, Chang CT (2009) Optimal manufacturer’s replenishment policies in the EPQ model under two levels of trade credit policy. Eur J Oper Res 195:358–363
Tsao YC, Sheen GJ (2007) Joint pricing and replenishment decisions for deteriorating items with lot-size and time dependent purchasing cost under credit period. Int J Syst Sci 38:549–561
Tsao YC, Sheen GJ (2008) Dynamic pricing, promotion and replenishment policies for a deteriorating item under permissible delay in payments. Comput Oper Res 35:3562–3580
Acknowledgment
We thank the Editor and two referees for their thoughtful comments which have aided us in the improvement of this manuscript. This paper was supported by the National Science Council under grant NSC 98-2410-H-036-004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: The proof of Proposition 1
Appendix 1: The proof of Proposition 1
-
(1)
Let \( \Uppsi (Q) = {\frac{{dTVC_{1} }}{dQ}},\quad {\text{then}}\quad {\frac{d\Uppsi (Q)}{dQ}} = {\frac{2K\lambda }{{Q^{3} }}} - {\frac{{C_{p} I_{p} (P - \lambda )M^{2} \lambda }}{{Q^{3} }}} - {\frac{{M^{2} \lambda^{2} I_{e} S_{p} }}{{Q^{3} }}}. \) If \( K\lambda - C_{p} I_{p} (P - \lambda )M^{2} \lambda - M^{2} \lambda^{2} I_{e} S_{p} > 0, \) we can know that \( \Uppsi (Q) \) is an increasing function because \( {\frac{d\Uppsi (Q)}{dQ}} > 0. \) When \( Q \to \infty \quad {\text{or}}\quad 0^{ + } , \) \( \Uppsi (Q) \) can be obtained by
$$ \begin{aligned} \mathop {\lim }\limits_{Q \to \infty } TVC_{1} (Q) = & {\frac{h\lambda (P - d - \lambda )}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{d\lambda h_{1} }}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{x^{2} \lambda h_{1} }}{{2P_{1} }}} + {\frac{{hx\lambda \left[ {P_{1} \left( {2P - 2\lambda - d} \right) - d\lambda } \right]}}{{2PP_{1}^{2} }}} \\ & + {\frac{{h\left[ {d\lambda + P_{1} \left( {\lambda - P} \right)} \right]^{2} }}{{2P^{2} P_{1}^{2} }}} + {\frac{{C_{p} I_{p} (P - \lambda )}}{P}} > 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$and \( \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{Q \to 0^{ + } }} TVC_{1} (Q) = - \infty < 0. \) Therefore, there exists a unique solution Q (where 0 < Q < ∞) for \( \Uppsi (Q) = 0 \). This completes this proof.
-
(2)
Let \( \Uppsi (Q) = {\frac{{dTVC_{2} }}{dQ}}, \) then \( {\frac{d\Uppsi (Q)}{dQ}} = {\frac{2K\lambda }{{Q^{3} }}} + {\frac{{C_{p} I_{p} M^{2} \lambda^{2} }}{{Q^{3} }}} - {\frac{{M^{2} \lambda^{2} I_{e} S_{p} }}{{Q^{3} }}}. \) If \( 2K\lambda + C_{p} I_{p} M^{2} \lambda^{2} - M^{2} \lambda^{2} I_{e} S_{p} > 0, \) we can know \( \Uppsi (Q) \) is an increasing function. When \( Q \to \infty \quad {\text{or}}\quad 0^{ + } , \) \( \Uppsi (Q) \) can be obtained by
$$ \begin{aligned} \mathop {\lim }\limits_{Q \to \infty } \Uppsi (Q) = \, & {\frac{h\lambda (P - d - \lambda )}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{d\lambda h_{1} }}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{x^{2} \lambda h_{1} - P_{1} C_{p} I_{p} }}{{2P_{1} }}} \\ & + {\frac{{hx\lambda \left[ {P_{1} \left( {2P - 2\lambda - d} \right) - d\lambda } \right]}}{{2PP_{1}^{2} }}} + {\frac{{h\left[ {d\lambda + P_{1} \left( {\lambda - P} \right)} \right]^{2} }}{{2P^{2} P_{1}^{2} }}} > 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$and \( \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{Q \to 0^{ + } }} \Uppsi (Q) = - \infty < 0 \). Therefore, there exists a unique solution Q (where 0 < Q <∞) for \( \Uppsi (Q) = 0 \). This completes this proof.
-
(3)
Let \( \Uppsi (Q) = {\frac{{dTVC_{3} }}{dQ}}, \) from \( {\frac{d\Uppsi (Q)}{dQ}} = {\frac{2K\lambda }{{Q^{3} }}} > 0, \), we can know \( \Uppsi (Q) \) is an increasing function. When \( Q \to \infty \quad {\text{or}}\quad 0^{ + } ,\quad \Uppsi (Q) \) can be obtained by
$$ \begin{aligned} \mathop {\lim }\limits_{Q \to \infty } \Uppsi (Q) = & {\frac{h\lambda (P - d - \lambda )}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{d\lambda h_{1} }}{{2P^{2} }}} + {\frac{{x^{2} \lambda h_{1} }}{{2P_{1} }}} + {\frac{{hx\lambda \left[ {P_{1} \left( {2P - 2\lambda - d} \right) - d\lambda } \right]}}{{2PP_{1}^{2} }}} \\ & + {\frac{{h\left[ {d\lambda + P_{1} \left( {\lambda - P} \right)} \right]^{2} }}{{2P^{2} P_{1}^{2} }}} + {\frac{{S_{p} I_{e} }}{2}} > 0 \\ \end{aligned} $$and \( \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{Q \to 0^{ + } }} \Uppsi (Q) = - \infty < 0. \) Therefore, there exists a unique solution Q (where 0 < Q <∞) for \( \Uppsi \left( Q \right) = 0 \). This completes this proof. □
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsao, YC., Chen, TH. & Huang, SM. A production policy considering reworking of imperfect items and trade credit. Flex Serv Manuf J 23, 48–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-010-9070-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-010-9070-3