Skip to main content
Log in

Tests on the Steel–Concrete Bond Strength in Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) Columns After Fire Exposure

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bond behaviour between the steel and concrete is important in ensuring the interaction of different components in steel reinforced concrete (SRC) columns under various working conditions, and sufficient bond strength should be kept in these columns even after fire exposure. This paper presents the experimental results of bond strength between the embedded steel and concrete in SRC columns after fire exposure. A total of eight push-out specimens were prepared, including two unheated and six fire exposed specimens. The fire exposed specimens were heated and left cooling down in a fire furnace, and then were tested for residual bond strength. Concrete explosive spalling was found when the test specimens were heated. The elevated temperatures at the steel–concrete interface and at the location of stirrups were recorded by thermocouples. Effects of different parameters, such as fire scenario, lateral confinement, and encased steel type, on the bond behaviour were analysed. Time delay was found in the temperature increase across the concrete section, and the inner maximum temperature reached at a measurement location was 430°C during the cooling phase, which was much higher than the temperature of 180°C measured at the end of heating phase for the same location. The reduction in bond strength was as high as 54.2%, whereas the corresponding ultimate slip increased significantly from around 0.3 mm to over 4 mm due to fire exposure. An existing model was revised to predict bond stress-slip curves for SRC columns after fire exposure, and a reasonably good agreement was obtained between the measured and predicted results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A sv :

Total area of stirrups within one spacing

b f :

Section width of steel flange

B :

Cross-sectional width

C z :

Thickness of concrete cover for flange

d :

Section depth of the embedded steel

D :

Cross-sectional depth

E c :

Young’s modulus of elasticity of concrete

E s :

Young’s modulus of elasticity of steel

f cu :

Compressive cube strength of concrete at the time of testing

f cu,f :

28-Day compressive cube strength of concrete

f y :

Yield strength of steel

f u :

Ultimate strength of steel

H c :

Embedded length of the steel section in concrete

k τT :

Parameter determining the bond stress after fire exposure

k sT :

Parameter determining the slip after fire exposure

N u :

Ultimate axial compressive load

S :

Slip

S r :

Slip when residual strength becomes stable

S t :

Spacing of stirrups

S u :

Slip corresponding to the ultimate bond strength

t :

Fire exposure time

t f :

Thickness of the steel flange

T :

Temperature

T max :

Maximum history temperature in the heating and cooling phases

τ :

Bond stress

τ r :

Residual bond stress

τ u :

Ultimate bond strength

τ ue :

Measured ultimate bond strength

τ up :

Predicted ultimate bond strength

References

  1. Han LH, Zheng YQ, Tao Z (2009) Fire performance of steel-reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Mag Concrete Res 61(7):409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mao XY, Kodur VKR (2011) Fire resistance of concrete encased steel columns under 3 and 4-side standard heating. J Constr Steel Res 67(3):270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han LH, Tan QH, Song TY (2015) Fire performance of steel reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 141(4):04014128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song TY, Han LH, Tao Z (2015) Structural behaviour of SRC beam-to-column joints subjected to simulated fire including cooling phase. J Struct Eng 141 (9) 04014234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pothisiri T, Panedpojaman P (2013) Modeling of mechanical bond-slip for steel-reinforced concrete under thermal loads. Eng Stuct 48:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang XH, Liu XL (2003) A strain-softening model for steel-concrete bond. Cem Concrete Res 33(10):1669–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang ZH (2010) Modelling the bond between concrete and reinforcing steel in a fire. Eng Struct 32(11):3660–3669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berther JF, Yurtdas I, Delmas Y, Li A (2011) Evaluation of the adhesion resistance between steel and concrete by push out test. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(2):75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Torre-Casanova A, Jason L, Davenne L, Pinelli X (2013) Confinement effects on the steel-concrete bond strength and pull-out failure. Eng Fract Mech 97:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pothisiri T, Panedpojaman P (2013) Modeling of mechanical bond-slip for steel-reinforced concrete under thermal loads. Eng Struct 48:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao Z, Han LH, Uy B, Chen X (2011) Post-fire bond between the steel tube and concrete in concrete-filled steel tubular columns. J Constr Steel Res 67 (3):484–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tao Z, Yu Q (2012) Residual bond strength in steel reinforced concrete columns after fire exposure. Fire Safety J 53:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. GB/T 706-2008 (2008) Hot rolled section steel (English version). Standards Press of China, Beijing

  14. Song TY (2010) Research on post-fire performance of steel-concrete composite beam-column joints. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University (in Chinese)

  15. Wu B, Li YH (2010) Effect of heating and cooling on axially restrained RC columns with special-shaped crow section. Fire Technol 46(2):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Lou GB, Chen KP, Li GQ (2015) Residual strength of organic anchorage adhesive for post-installed rebar at elevated temperatures and after heating. Fire Technol. doi:10.1007/s10694-015-0510-1

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kang H, Lee HD, Hwang JH, Oh JY, Kim KS (2015) Structural performance of prestressed composite members with corrugated webs exposed to fire. Fire Technol. doi: 10.1007/s10694-015-0521-y

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bundy M, Hamins A, Choe (2016) Structural fire experimental capabilities at the NIST National Fire Research Laboratory. Fire Technol. doi: 10.1007/s10694-015-0544-4

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hou LF, Li M, Cui WY, Liu YC (2011) Numerical simulation and analysis of on-building high-rise building fires. Proc Eng 11:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. www.fire.nist.gov/fds/index.html

  21. Dwaikat MB, Kour VKR (2010) Fire induced spalling in high strength concrete beams. Fire Technol 46(2): 251–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. HulinT, Maluk C, Bisby L, Hodicky K, Schmidt JW, Stang H (2015) Experimental studies on the fire behaviour of high performance concrete thin plates. Fire Technol 51(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang HJ (2010) Bond behaviour of steel reinforced concrete members after exposure to standard fire. Master Thesis, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University (in Chinese)

  24. Yang Y (2005) Study on the basic theory and its application of bond-slip between steel shape and concrete in SRC structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (in Chinese)

  25. Hawkins NM (1973) Strength of concrete-encased steel beams. Civil Engineering Transactions, Institute of Engineers Australia CE15(1-2):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roeder CW (1984) Bond stress of embedded steel shapes in concrete. Composite and mixed construction. In: Proceedings of the US/Japan Joint Seminar, New York, pp 227–240

  27. Hamdan M, Hunaiti Y (1991) Factors affecting bond strength in composite columns. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on steel-concrete composite structures. Fukuoka, Japan. pp. 213–218

  28. Wium JA (1992) A composite columns: force transfer from steel section to concrete encasement. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lausanne (Switzerland): Swiss Federal Institue of Technology

  29. Xiao JQ, Zhong SS, Zou LM (1992) Experimental study on the bond behavior of steel reinforced concrete. Sichuan Building Science, 18(4):2–6 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roeder CW, Chmielowski R, Brown CB (1999) Shear connector requirements for embeded steel sections. J Struct Eng 125(2):142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu C, He YB (2002) Experimental study on bond behavior of steel reinforced concrete. J Hunan Univ 29(3):168–173 (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao GT, Han MY, Li YH (2006) Bond behavior and ultimate bearing capacity of steel reinforced concrete short columns. Ind Constr 36(4):36–39 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by China National Key Basic Research Special Funds project under Grant No. 2012CB719700 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China projects No. 51308539. The financial support is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin-Hai Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, WH., Han, LH., Tan, QH. et al. Tests on the Steel–Concrete Bond Strength in Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) Columns After Fire Exposure. Fire Technol 53, 917–945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0610-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0610-6

Keywords

Navigation