Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Twin-Fluid (Water Mist and Inert Gas) Fire Extinguishing Systems by Testing and Modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, some twin-fluid water mist systems have been developed to employ a large quantity of inert gas in conjunction with water. As a result, concern has been raised about whether such twin-fluid systems are true water mist systems, considering the fact that the gas used in the traditional twin-fluid water mist system is mainly for water atomization, not intended for fire extinguishment. The basis of the concern is that the requirements for water mist systems and gaseous systems, in terms of safety factor and agent discharge duration, are very different according to the pertinent NFPA standards. Therefore, there is a need to characterize such systems to ensure that appropriate standards are applied. An investigation was conducted to analyze the fire extinguishing characteristics of a twin-fluid system using a large quantity of nitrogen for water atomization, whose fire extinguishing performance had previously been evaluated with four spray fire scenarios in a 260 m3 machinery enclosure as described in FM Approval Standard 5560. Either diesel or heptane was used in the fire tests. Subsequently, a well-stirred reactor model was used to assist in analyzing the test results, and make fire extinguishment assessment for hypothetical protections employing only the water mist or nitrogen component of the twin-fluid system. The analyses showed that either the nitrogen or water mist component alone could extinguish fire for all the investigated fire scenarios. As a result, the twin-fluid system is more appropriately designated as a hybrid fire extinguishing system, instead of a traditional water mist or gaseous system. Based on the analyses, it is proposed that a twin-fluid system may be designated as a gaseous system, a water mist system, or a hybrid system if the dry-basis oxygen concentration in the enclosure at fire extinction is lower than 12.5%, higher than 16%, or between 12.5% and 16%, respectively. Also proposed are the system safety factors and discharge durations for hybrid systems whose fire extinguishing performance is enhanced by coupling water mist with a large quantity of inert gases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mawhinney JR (2008) Water mist fire suppression systems. In: Cote AE (ed) Fire protection handbook, 20th edn, Chap 8. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  2. NFPA 750 (2010) Standard on water mist fire protection systems. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  3. NFPA 12 (2011) Standard on carbon dioxide extinguishing systems. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  4. NFPA 2001 (2012) Standard on clean agent fire protection systems. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  5. FM Approvals Class 5560 (2012) Approval standard for water mist systems. FM Approvals, Norwood, MA

  6. Varri J (2001) A study of total flooding water mist fire suppression system performance using a transient one-zone computer model. Fire Technol 37:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li HF, Chow WK (2004) Modelling of water mist fire suppression systems by a one-zone model. Combust Theor Model 8(3):567–592

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zabetakis M (1965) Flammability characteristics of combustible gases and vapors. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC, Bulletin 627

  9. Lefebvre AH (1989) Atomization and sprays. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rasbash DJ (1962) The extinction of fires by water sprays. Fire Res Abstr Rev 4:28–52

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lebedev, PI, Rybanin, SS, Stesik, LN (1981) Heat and mass transfer of a liquid drop evaporating into a flow of gas capable of condensing. Int Heat Mass Transf 24(4):611–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carey VP (1992) Liquid-vapor phase-change phenomena: an introduction to the thermodynamics of vaporization and condensation processes in heat transfer equipment. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prahl J, Emmons HW (1975) Fire induced flow through an opening. Combust Flame 25:369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan, SW (1967) Foundations of fluid mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tewarson A (2008) Generation of heat and gaseous, liquid and solid products in fires. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn, Chap 3–4. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  16. Yu HZ, Kung HC, Han Z (1986) Spray cooling in room fires. In: Proceedings of the 21st symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, pp 129–136

  17. Yu HZ, Kung HC, Han Z (1989) The effects of spray cooling on the ceiling gas temperature at the door opening of room fires. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on fire safety science. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, pp 129–136

  18. Ferziger JH (1981) Numerical methods for engineering application. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyler C (2008) Flammability limits of premixed and diffusion flames. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn, Chap 2–7. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Zeng Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, HZ., Kasiski, R. & Daelhousen, M. Characterization of Twin-Fluid (Water Mist and Inert Gas) Fire Extinguishing Systems by Testing and Modeling. Fire Technol 51, 923–950 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-014-0428-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-014-0428-z

Keywords

Navigation