Skip to main content
Log in

Feminism, Law, and Neoliberalism: An Interview and Discussion with Wendy Brown

  • Interview
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the 24th June 2015, Feminist Legal Studies and the London School of Economics (LSE) Law Department hosted an afternoon event with Professor Wendy Brown, Class of 1936 First Professor of Political Science, University of California. Professor Brown kindly agreed to discuss her scholarship on feminist theory, and its relationship to both the law and neoliberalism. The event included an interview by Dr Katie Cruz (University of Leeds, Law School) and a Q&A session, which are presented here in an edited version of the transcript. Sumi Madhock, Professor of Gender Studies, LSE chaired the interview and discussion and introduced Professor Brown’s work. Katie Cruz asked Wendy Brown to reflect upon topics that span her scholarship and activism, including the state of critical, feminist, and Left approaches to rights, neoliberalism, despair and utopianism, and the future of feminist theory and practice in the context of neoliberalism and current debates about intersectionality. Participants in the discussion asked questions on a wide range of issues, including the limits of feminist engagement with law as a tool for social change, the dominance of neoliberalism, imperialist feminism, Islamophobia, secularism, and our attachment to the figure of homo politicus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Citizens’ United v Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 130 S.Ct.876 (2010) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf and https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZS.html . Burwell v Hobby Lobby 573 U.S. 134 S.Ct 2751 (2014) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf and https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/13-354. Accessed 1 December 2015.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. Do Muslim women need saving?. Cambridge: University of Harvard Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2001. Politics out of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2005. Edgework: Essays in knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2008. Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of empire and identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled states, waning sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlee. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlee. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, Katie. 2013. Unmanageable work, (Un)liveable lives: The UK sex industry, labour rights and the welfare state. Social and Legal Studies 22: 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, Katie. 2015. Within and against the law: UK sex worker rights activism and the politics of rights. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

  • Friedman, Milton. 1963. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/decoding. In Culture, media, language, ed. Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Love, and Paul Willis. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, Janet. 2006. Split decisions: How and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton: Princeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 2000. On the Jewish question. In Karl Marx: Selected writings, ed. David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra. 1988. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, James. 1973. The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan. 2009a. The politics of the veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan. 2009b. Sexularism. RSCAS Distinguished Lecture 2009/01 (23 April 2009). European University Institute, Florence, Italy. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/11553/RSCAS_DL_2009_01.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Cruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruz, K., Brown, W. Feminism, Law, and Neoliberalism: An Interview and Discussion with Wendy Brown. Fem Leg Stud 24, 69–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-016-9314-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-016-9314-z

Keywords

Navigation