Abstract
In this paper, we discuss how to model credit risk under the benchmark approach. Firstly we introduce an affine credit risk model. We then show how to price credit default swaps (CDSs) and introduce credit valuation adjustment (CVA) as an extension of CDSs. In particular, our model can capture right-way—and wrong-way exposure. This means, we capture the dependence structure of the default event and the value of the transaction under consideration. For simple contracts, we provide closed-form solutions. However, due to the fact that we allow for a dependence between the default event and the value of the transaction, closed-form solutions are difficult to obtain in general. Hence we conclude this paper with a reduced form model, which is more tractable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldeaux, J., & Platen, E. (2013). Functionals of multidimensional diffusions with applications to finance. Bocconi & Springer Series.
Bielecki, T., Brigo, D., & Patras, F. (2011). Credit risk frontiers: Subprime crisis, pricing and hedging, CVA, MBS, ratings, and liquidity. New York: Wiley.
Brigo, D., & Chourdakis, K. (2009). Counterparty risk for credit default swaps: Impact of spread volatility and default correlation. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 12(7), 1007–1026.
Burgard, C. Z., & Kjaer, M. (2011). Funding cost adjustment for derivatives. Asia Risk, 2011, 63–67.
Cesari, G., Aquilina, J., Charpillon, N., Filipović, Z., Lee, G., & Manda, I. (2009). Modelling, pricing, and hedging counterparty credit exposure. Berlin: Springer.
Crépey, S. (2011). A BSDE approach to counterparty risk under funding constraints. University de Evry (working paper).
Du, K., & Platen, E. (2012a). Benchmarked risk minimization. University of Technology, Sydney (working paper).
Du, K., & Platen, E. (2012b). Forward and futures contracts on commodities under the benchmark approach. University of Technology, Sydney (working paper).
Filipović, D. (2009). Term-structure models. Berlin: Springer Finance.
Kelly, J. R. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell Systems Technology Journal, 35, 917–926.
Lennox, K. (2011). Lie symmetry methods for multi-dimensional linear parabolic PDEs and diffusions. Ph. D. thesis, UTS, Sydney.
Long, J. B. (1990). The numeraire portfolio. Journal on Financial Economics, 26(1), 29–69.
Musiela, M., & Rutkowski, M. (2005). Martingale methods in financial modelling (2nd ed.)., Volume 36 of Applied Mathematics Berlin: Springer.
Pallavicini, A., Perini, D., & Brigo, D. (2011). Funding valuation adjustment: A consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypothecation. Imperial College, London (working paper).
Platen, E. (2002). A benchmark framework for integrated risk management. Technical report, University of Technology, Sydney. QFRG Research Paper 82.
Platen, E., & Bruti-Liberati, N. (2010). Numerical solution of SDEs with jumps in finance. Berlin: Springer.
Platen, E., & Heath, D. (2010). A benchmark approach to quantitative finance. Berlin: Springer Finance.
Platen, E., & Rendek, R. (2012). Approximating the numeraire portfolio by naive diversification. Journal of Asset Management, 13(1), 34–50.
Tang, D., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Counterparty risk for credit default swaps with states related default intensity processes. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 14(8), 1335–1353.
Wu, L. (2012). CVA and FVA under margining. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (working paper).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Laplace Transforms for Square-Root Processes
Appendix: Laplace Transforms for Square-Root Processes
The following results are based on Lennox (2011) and are contained in Baldeaux and Platen (2013) as Propositions 7.3.8 and 7.3.9. Consider a square-root process \(X = \left\{ X_t, \, t \ge 0 \right\} \), where
with \(X_0=x >0\).
Proposition 7.1
Assume that \(X = \left\{ X_t, \, t \ge 0 \right\} \) is given by (34) and that \(\frac{2 a }{\sigma } \ge 2\). Let \(\beta = 1 + m - \alpha + \frac{\nu }{2}\), \(m=\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{a}{\sigma } - 1 \right) \), and \(\nu = \frac{1}{\sigma } \sqrt{(a - \sigma )^2 + 4 \mu \sigma }\). Then if \(m > \alpha - \frac{\nu }{2} -1\),
where \({}_1{}F_1\) denotes the confluent hypergeometric function. Finally, we present Proposition 2.0.42 from Lennox (2011).
Proposition 7.2
Assume that \(X = \left\{ X_t, \, t \ge 0 \right\} \) is given by Eq. (34) and that \(\frac{2 a }{\sigma } \ge 2\). Define \(A=b^2+4 \mu \sigma \), \(m=\frac{1}{\sigma } \sqrt{(a- \sigma )^2 + 4 \sigma \nu } \), \(\beta = \frac{\sqrt{A x}}{\sigma \sinh ( \frac{\sqrt{A} t}{2} )}\), and \(k = \frac{\sqrt{A} + b \tanh ( \frac{\sqrt{A} t}{2} )}{2 \sigma \tanh (\frac{\sqrt{A} t}{2})}\). Then if \( a > ( 2 \alpha -3 ) \sigma \), for \(\mu >0\), \(\nu \ge 0\),
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldeaux, J., Platen, E. Credit Derivative Evaluation and CVA Under the Benchmark Approach. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 22, 305–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-015-9204-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-015-9204-4