Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Samuelson Hypothesis & Indian Commodity Derivatives Market

  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Samuelson (1965) devised that futures price volatility increases as the futures contract approaches its expiration. The relation amid the volatility and time to maturity has significant inference for hedging strategies. Interestingly, so far the empirical evidence in favor of the Samuelson Hypothesis (maturity effect) is mixed in various markets. Considering no significant work to examine the relationship is so far carried out in commodity derivative markets of India, this paper ordeal the Samuelson Hypothesis on 8 commodities traded on Multi-Commodity Exchange (MCX), India. We have examined the issue by applying different regression techniques to test the hypothesis for 8 commodities (Aluminium, Nickel, Copper, Gold, Silver, Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Wheat) using inter-day data on MCX India. In order to test the Samuelson’s hypothesis, tests have been conducted using a series of GARCH, EGARCH and TGARCH models by including trading volume, open interest and time-to-maturity in the conditional variance equation. From our results, it is concluded that Samuelson’s hypothesis does not hold true for majority of commodity contracts considered. Our results also find that volatility series depend on the trading volume, compared to the time-to-maturity or open interest. As Samuelson hypothesis does not hold true for majority of commodity contracts, traders in Indian commodity derivative markets should not bias their decisions solely based on the time-to-maturity, but should also consider trading volume and open interest as they are an important determinant of price volatility. They should also consider the possibility of leverage effect while predicting future price volatilities, and the associated margin requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson R. W. (1985) Some determinants of the volatility of futures prices. Journal of Futures Markets 5: 331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. E., & Cruickshank, S. N. (2000). Empirical testing of the Samuelson hypothesis: An application to futures markets in Australia, Singapore and the UK. Working paper, School of Finance and Business Economics, Edith Cowan University.

  • Bessembinder H., Coughenour J. F., Seguin P. J., Smeller M. M. (1996) Is there a term structure of futures volatilities? Reevaluating the Samuelson hypothesis. Journal of Derivatives 4: 45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder H., Seguin P.J. (1993) Price volatility, trading volume and market depth: evidence from futures markets. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis 26(1): 21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board J. L. G., Sutcliffe C. M. S. (1990) Information, volatility, volume and maturity: An investigation of stock index futures. Review of Futures Markets 9: 532–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory econometrics for finance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, New York. ISBN-13 978-0-511-39848-3.

  • Daal E., Farhat J., Wei P. P. (2006) Does futures exhibit maturity effect? New evidence from an extensive set of US and foreign futures contracts. Review of Financial Economics 15: 113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong H. N., Kalev P. S. (2008) The Samuelson hypothesis in futures markets: An analysis using intraday data. Journal of Banking and Finance 32: 489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floros C., Vougas D. V. (2006) Samuelson’s hypothesis in Greek stock index futures market. Investment Management & Financial Innovation 3: 154–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway T., Kolb R. W. (1996) Futures prices and the maturity effect. Journal of Futures Markets 16: 809–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, R. Q., & Alvarez, S. (2004). Samuelson hypothesis revised: The case of the IBEX index futures. Stochastic finance 2004, Autumn School and international conference. Available at http://ferrari.dmat.fct.unl.pt/personal/mle/SF04/session7/Quiroga_y_Sanchez.pdf Last accessed on March 23, 2011.

  • Goodwin B. K., Schnepf R. (2000) Determinants of endogenous price risk in corn and wheat futures market. Jouranl of Futures markets 20: 753–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert J. H. (1995) Trading volume, maturity and natural gas futures price volatility. Energy Economics 17: 293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. (1998). Does the Samuelson effect hold for SPI futures? Working paper, Department of Accounting and Finance, The University of Western Australia.

  • Kolb, R.W., & Overdhal J.A. (2006). Understanding futures markets (6th ed.). Australia: Blackwell Publication, ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-3403-3

  • Khoury N., Yourougou P. (1993) Determinants of agricultural futures price volatilities: evidence from Winnipeg commodity exchange. Journal of Futures Markets 13: 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistikow D. (1989) Announcements and futures price variability. Journal of Futures Markets 9: 477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa I. A., Bollen B. (2001) Is there a maturity effect in the price of the S&P 500 futures contract?. Applied Economics Letters 8: 693–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pati, P. (2006). Maturity and volume effects on the volaitility: Evidences from NSE NIFTY futures. Paper presented at Unit Trust of India Capital Markets (UTICM) 10th Conference, Mumbai. Available at http://10.3.100.244/service/home/~/Pati%20paper.pdf?auth=co&loc=en_US&id=22831&part=3. Last accessed on January 6, 2012.

  • Ripple, R. D., & Moosa, I. A. (2007). The effect of maturity, trading volume, and open interest on crude oil futures price range-based volatility. In Proceedings of the EcoMod conference on energy and environmental modeling, Moscow, Russia, September 13–14, 2007. Available at http://www.ecomod.org/files/papers/478.pdf. Last accessed on December 22, 2011.

  • Rutledge D.J.S. (1979) Trading volume and price variability: New evidence on the price effects of speculation. In: Goss B.A. (eds) Futures markets: Their establishment and performance. Croom Helm, London, pp 137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P. A. (1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review 6: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma A., Kumar V. (2010) An examination of the maturity effect in the Indian commodities futures market. Agricultural Economics Research Review 23: 335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls W. D. (1999) Volatility, volume and maturity in electricity futures. Applied Financial Economics 9: 283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

    Saurabh Kumar Gupta & Prabina Rajib

Authors
  1. Saurabh Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prabina Rajib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabina Rajib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S.K., Rajib, P. Samuelson Hypothesis & Indian Commodity Derivatives Market. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 19, 331–352 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-012-9152-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-012-9152-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation