Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers

  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have documented that concerns about genetic discrimination (GD) may influence access to and participation in medically necessary care. We sought to characterize how GD issues influence current cancer genetics professional (CGP) practice, determine if their attitudes regarding GD have changed over time, and compare their knowledge and attitudes regarding laws prohibiting GD to a contemporary cohort of non-genetics clinicians. Members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Familial Cancer Special Interest Group were invited to complete a 39 item online survey, adapted from previously published instruments. The resulting data were compared to a survey of CGPs published in 2000 and to a contemporary cohort of non-genetics clinicians (n = 1,181). There were 153 qualified respondents. Compared to the historical CGP cohort (n = 163), a significantly greater proportion said they would bill insurance for the cost of genetic testing for themselves (P < 0.0001). Most CGPs (94%) considered the risk of GD to be low to theoretical, concordant with 64% who expressed confidence in existing federal laws prohibiting GD. The mean knowledge score of CGPs regarding GD protective laws was significantly greater than that of non-genetics clinicians (P < 0.001). As barometers of change, CGPs show a migration in opinion over the past 8 years, with decreased fear of GD and greater knowledge of laws prohibiting GD compared to non-genetics clinicians. Better knowledge of GD and protective legislation, may facilitate non-genetics clinician utilization of genetics and personalized medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowstuter KJ, Sand S, Blazer KR et al (2008) Influence of genetic discrimination perceptions and knowledge on cancer genetics referral practice among clinicians. Genet Med 10(9):691–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nedelcu R, Blazer KR, Schwerin BU et al (2004) Genetic discrimination: the clinician perspective. Clin Genet 66(4):311–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Freedman AN, Wideroff L, Olson L et al (2003) US physicians’ attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 120A(1):63–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL et al (1997) Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(2):148–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lynch HT, Snyder C, Lynch JF et al (2006) Patient responses to the disclosure of BRCA mutation tests in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer families. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 165(2):91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veach PM, Bartels DM, LeRoy BS (2001) Ethical and professional challenges posed by patients with genetic concerns: a report of focus group discussions with genetic counselors, physicians, and nurses. J Genet Couns 10:97–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall MA, McEwen JE, Barton JC et al (2005) Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers. Genet Med 7(5):311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Billings PR, Kohn MA, de Cuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper JS, Natowicz MR (1992) Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am J Hum Genet 50:476–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rose AL, Peters N, Shea JA, Armstrong K (2005) Attitudes and misconceptions about predictive genetic testing for cancer risk. Community Genet 8(3):145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall MA, Rich SS (2000) Patients’ fear of genetic discrimination by health insurers: the impact of legal protections. Genet Med 2(4):214–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lapham EV, Kozma C, Weiss JO (1996) Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers. Science 274(25):621–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E et al (2003) Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 163(5):573–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall MA, Rich SS (2000) Laws restricting health insurers’ use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination. Am J Hum Genet 66:293–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NCSL (2007) Genetics and health insurance state anti-discrimination laws. http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/Health/GeneticNondiscriminationinHealthInsuranceLaws/tabid/14374/Default.aspx. Cited 13 Feb 2008

  15. Nowlan W (2002) Human genetics: a rational view of insurance and genetic discrimination. Science 297(5579):195–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banks K, Weitzel JN, Metzenberg A, Vandergon V, Blazer KR (2004) Cancer genetic testing and genetic discrimination: a pre-cancer risk counseling survey of patient knowledge and opinions. Paper presented at the American society of human genetics: 54th annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 26–30 October 2004

  17. Kass NE, Medley AM, Natowicz MR et al (2007) Access to health insurance: experiences and attitudes of those with genetic versus non-genetic medical conditions. Am J Med Genet 143(7):707–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harmon A (2008) Fear of insurance trouble leads many to shun or hide DNA tests. The New York Times. 24 Feb 2008 Sunday. Sect A, 1–4

  19. Matloff ET, Shappell H, Brierley K, Bernhardt BA, McKinnon W, Peshkin BN (2000) What would you do? Specialists’ perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination. J Clin Oncol 18(12):2484–2492

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfeffer NL, McCarthy Veach P, LeRoy BS (2003) An investigation of genetic counselors’ discussions of genetic discrimination with cancer risk patients. J Genet Couns 12(5):419–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Finley R (1999–2009) Surveymonkey.com, Portland, OR 97209 http://www.surveymonkey.com. Cited 13 Feb 2008

  22. Dillman DA, Christensen JA, Carpenter EH, Brooks RM (1974) Increasing mail questionnaire response: a four state comparison. Am Sociol Rev 39(5):744–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matloff ET (2000) The breast surgeon’s role in BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. Am J Surg 180(4):294–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L et al (2000) Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med 75:850–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hudson KL, Holohan MK, Collins FS (2008) Keeping pace with the times—the genetic information nondiscrimination act of 2008. N Engl J Med 358(25):2661–2663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rothstein MA (2008) Putting the genetic information nondiscrimination act in context. Genet Med 10(9):655–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall MA, Rich SS (2000) Genetic privacy laws and patients’ fear of discrimination by health insurers: the view from genetic counselors. J Law Med Ethics 28(3):245–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parrott S, Del Vecchio M (2007) Professional status survey 2006. In: National society of genetic counselors, Inc. http://www.nsgc.org/client_files/career/2006_PSS_RESULTS.pdf. Cited 18 Feb 2008

  29. Hall MA (2006) Genetic discrimination. Paper presented at the national society of genetic counselors annual education conference, Nashville, TN, 10–14 November 2006

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Gwen Uman for her assistance with data analysis, Dr. Cindy Malone for her contributions to this project, and Janelle Hilario and Shawntel Payton for their assistance with preparation of the manuscript. This project was funded in part by the State of California, Department of Health Services, Cancer Research Program, NHGRI grant number R03 HG002846-01, and the California State University, Northridge Thesis Support Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey N. Weitzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huizenga, C.R., Lowstuter, K., Banks, K.C. et al. Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers. Familial Cancer 9, 253–260 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9308-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9308-y

Keywords

Navigation