Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the fisherian mechanism: examining the genetic correlation between male song and female response in waxmoths

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of indirect (genetic) benefits sexual selection predict linkage disequilibria between genes that influence male traits and female preferences, owing to either non-random mate choice or physical linkage. Such linkage disequilibria, a genetic correlation, can accelerate the evolution of male traits and female preferences to exaggerated levels. But relatively few empirical studies have measured the genetic correlation between male traits and female responses in natural populations, and the findings of those few are mixed: often, genetic correlations are not found. We tested the above prediction in an acoustic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella, in which males attract females with a rhythmic train of sound pulses, and females respond only to song that exceeds a minimum pulse rhythm. Both male song rhythm and female threshold response are repeatable and heritable characters. Because female choice in A. grisella is based largely on male song, and males do not appear to provide direct benefits at mating, genetic correlation between male song rhythm and female response is expected. We studied 2 A. grisella populations, bred them according to a full-sib/half-sib design, split the progeny among 4 different environmental conditions, and measured the male song/female response genetic correlation in each of the 8 resulting groups. While song rhythm and response threshold were generally heritable, we found no evidence of significant genetic correlation between these traits. We suggest that the complexity of the various male song characters, of female response to male song, and of correlations between male song characters and between aspects of female response have mitigated the evolution of strong genetic correlation between song and response. Thus, exaggerated levels of trait development may be tempered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison JD, Roff DA, Cardé RT (2008) Genetic independence of female signal form and male receiver design in the almond moth, Cadra cautella. J Evol Biol 21:1666–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM (1993) Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363:255–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM (1999) The study of intersexual selection using quantitative genetics. Behaviour 136:1237–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker TCM, Pomiankowski A (1995) The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J Evol Biol 8:129–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blows MW (1999) Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2169–2174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LSE, Greenfield MD (2004) Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. J Evol Biol 17:821–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt LSE, Ludvar BC, Greenfield MD (2005) Co-occurrence of acceptance thresholds and preference functions in female choice: mate discrimination in the lesser wax moth. Ethology 111:609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breden F, Hornaday K (1994) Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy. Heredity 73:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins RD, Jang Y, Reinhold K, Greenfield MD (1999) Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signaling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Heredity 83:644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson-François A, Kelly JK, Greenfield MD (2006) Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J Evol Biol 19:532–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson-François A, Zhou Y, Greenfield MD (2009) Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype × environment interactions and conserve genetic variance. Genetica 136:27–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry JD (1992) The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46:540–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (2002) Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Baker M (2003) Bat avoidance in non-aerial insects: the silence response of signaling males in an acoustic moth. Ethology 109:427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Coffelt JA (1983) Reproductive behaviour of the lesser wax moth, Achroia grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae): signalling, pair formation, male interactions, and mate guarding. Behaviour 84:287–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Medlock C (2007) Temperature coupling as an emergent property: parallel thermal effects on male song and female response do not contribute to species recognition in an acoustic moth. Evolution 61:1590–1599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL (2004) Genotype × environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68:1461–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Weber T (2000) Evolution of ultrasonic signalling in wax moths: discrimination of ultrasonic mating calls from bat echolocation signals and the exploitation of an anti-predator receiver bias by sexual advertisement. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greig EI, Greenfield MD (2004) Sexual selection and predator avoidance in an acoustic moth: discriminating females take fewer risks. Behaviour 141:799–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne DJ, Via S (2001) Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412:904–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially-rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde AE (1994) Effect of artificial selection on male color patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Greenfield MD (1996) Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in wax moths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals. Anim Behav 51:1095–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Greenfield MD (1998) Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Evolution 52:1383–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Greenfield MD (2000) Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. Heredity 84:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Collins RD, Greenfield MD (1997) Variation and repeatability of ultrasonic sexual advertisement signals in Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Behav 10:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JK (2003) Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 164:1071–1085

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JK, Arathi HS (2003) Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90:77–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW (2004) Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683–691

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Künike G (1930) Zur biologie der kleinen wachsmotte, Achroia grisella Fabr. Z Angew Entomol 16:304–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic characters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Roelofs W, Bengtsson BO (1989) No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European cornborer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics 123:553–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Milum VG (1940) Moth pests of honey bee combs. Glean Bee Cult 68:424–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MR, Wagner WE, Ryan MJ (1996) A negative correlation between trait and mate preference in Xiphophorus pygmaeus. Anim Behav 52:1193–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhlhauser C, Blanckenhorn WU (2004) The quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behaviour 141:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Brommer JE, Gustafsson L (2006) Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441:84–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (2003) Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1089–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Hoikkala A (2005) Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim Behav 70:849–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD (2003) Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57:1304–1313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD (2004) Behavioral context regulates dual function of hearing in ultrasonic moths: bat avoidance and pair formation. Physiol Entomol 29:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther SA, Sætre GP, Borge T, Wiley C, Svedin N, Andersson G, Veen T, Haavie J, Servedio MR, Bureš S, Král M, Hjernquist MB, Gustafsson L, Träff J, Qvarnström A (2007) Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318:95–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU, Kalko EKV (2001) Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Case A, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (2004) Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RG (1987) Maximum likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41:812–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Kotiaho JS (2007) Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16604–16608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol Entomol 9:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1984) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. I. Genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution 38:881–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Reillo PR (1994) Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Kuster HK, Pettis JS, Danka RG, Gleason JM, Greenfield MD (2008) Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Evolution 62:1317–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Bethany Harris, Hannah Hohendorf and Chelsea Medlock (Univ. of Kansas) for assistance in the laboratory and Robin Cargel, Robert Danka (U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Baton Rouge, Louisiana) and Jeffrey Pettis (U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland) for field assistance. Software for analyzing song parameters was developed with the assistance of Simon Gray (Cambridge Electronic Design) and LaRoy Brandt (Univ. Kansas). Critical reviews by Rafael Rodriguez and two anonymous referees greatly improved an earlier version of the manuscript. The project was supported financially by U.S. National Science Foundation grant IOB-0516634.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Greenfield.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 62 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Kelly, J.K. & Greenfield, M.D. Testing the fisherian mechanism: examining the genetic correlation between male song and female response in waxmoths. Evol Ecol 25, 307–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9421-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9421-2

Keywords

Navigation