Abstract
The African stem borer, Busseola fusca Fuller, is one of the most devastating insect pests of maize in tropical environments. Understanding of combining ability and heterosis may be useful for designing insect resistant hybrids. However, among the adapted maize inbred lines used in this study, the combining ability and heterotic orientation for grain yield and borer resistance is not known. The objective of this study was to determine combining ability and heterotic orientation of maize inbred lines under B. fusca infestation. Sixty six inbred lines were crossed to two single cross testers from CIMMYT in accordance with the line × tester mating scheme. The 132 three-way testcross hybrids and four checks were evaluated at two locations in Kenya. Data were analysed using PROC GLM of SAS statistical package. The genotypes × environment interactions were significant, therefore the two test locations were considered as ideal environments for genotype comparison. General combining ability effects were significant for B. fusca stem borer resistance and grain yield, suggesting a preponderance of the additive gene effects for borer resistance traits. Specific combining ability effects were significant for B. fusca borer resistance traits and grain yield indicating that non-additive effects were also influential. Based on grain yield heterosis data at Embu, 22 lines were allocated to group A, 18 to group B and 8 to group AB, while at Kakamega, 24 lines were oriented to group A, 13 to group B and 9 to group AB, whilst the remainder could not be classified. Based on the SCA effects, at Embu, 20 lines revealed positive SCA effects with both testers and were considered to be AB-oriented; while 12 and 7 lines were oriented towards A and B, respectively. A similar trend was observed at Kakamega but only one line exhibited positive SCA effects for grain yield with both testers, while the remainder had negative SCA effects. The identified lines and heterotic groups may be used by maize programmes that emphasize stem borer resistance in hybrids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adijah AM, Kathuri NJ, Odero-Wanga D, Shivoga WA (2011) Challenges facing smallscale maize farmers in western province of Kenya in the agricultural reform era. Am J Exp Agric 1:466–476
Beyene Y, Mugo S, Gakunga J, Karaya H, Mutinda CJM, Tefera T, Njoka S, Chepkesis D, Shuma JM, Tende R (2011) Combining ability of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines resistant to stem borers. Afr J Biotechnol 10:4759–4766
Brooks S, Thompson J, Odame H, Kibaara B, Nderitu S, Karin F, Millstone E (2009) Environmental change and maize innovation in Kenya: exploring pathways in and out of maize. University of Sussex: STEPS Centre, Brighton
Butrón A, Sandoya G, Revilla P, Malvar RA (2009) Genetics of resistance to the pink stem borer (Sesamia nonagrioides) in maize (Zea mays). Ann Appl Biol 154:205–217. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00284.x
CIMMYT (1989) Toward insect resistant maize for the third world In: Proceedings of the international symposium on methodologies for developing host plant resistance to maize insects. CIMMYT, Mexico, p 175
CIMMYT (2001) Maize inbred lines released by CIMMYT: a compilation of 454 CIMMYT maize lines (CMLs), CML1-CML454, August 2001. CIMMYT, Mexico
Dabholkar AR (1992) Elements of biometrical genetics. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 187–214
De Groote H, Owuor G, Odendo MJO, Muhammad L, Wanyama J (2003) What happened to the maize revolution in Kenya? FASID conference: green revolution in Asia and its transferability to Africa II. Durban, August 2003
De Groote H, Bett C, Ouma J.O, Odendo M, Mose L, Wekesa, E (2004) Direct estimation of maize crop losses due to stem borers in Kenya, preliminary results from 2000 and 2001. In: Friesen DK, Palmer AFE (eds) Integrated approaches to higher maize productivity in the new millennium: proceedings of the 7th eastern and southern africa regional maize conference. CIMMYT, Nairobi, 11–15 February 2002, pp 401–406
East EM (1909) Inbreeding in corn. In: Connecticut Agricultural Experiments Station Report, pp 419–428
Fato P, Derera J, Tongoona P, Makanda I, Sibiya J (2012) Heterotic orientation of tropical maize inbred lines towards populations ZM523 and Suwan-1 under downy mildew infestation. Euphytica 187:381–392
Fehr WR (1987) Heterosis. In: Fehr WR (ed) Principles of cultivar development: volume 1 theory and technique. Macmillan Publishing, New York
Guimaraes LJM, Miranda GV, DeLima RO, Maia C, Oliveira Rd, Souza AVd (2012) Performance of testers with different genetic structure for evaluation of maize inbred lines. Ciencia Rural 42:770–776
Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KD (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 463–565
Jaetzold R, Schmidt H (1982) Farm management handbook of Kenya. Natural conditions and farm management information. Part A, B and C. Ministry of Agriculture, NAirobi
Kanagarasu S, Nallathambi G, Ganesan KN (2010) Combining ability analysis for yield and its component traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Electron J Plant Breed 1(4):915–920
Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. Chapman and Hall Ltd, Wiley, London
Liberatore KL, Jiang K, Zamir D, Lippman ZB (2013) Heterosis: the case for single-gene overdominance polyploid and hybrid genomics. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 137–152
Mailafiya DM, Le Ru PB, Kairu EW, Dupas S, Calatayud PA (2011) Parasitism of lepidopterous stem borers in cultivated and natural habitats. J Insect Sci 11:1–20
Morais AA, Pinheiro JB (2012) Breeding for Resistance to Insect Pests. In: Fritsche-Neto R, Borém A (eds) Plant breeding for biotic stress resistance. Springer, Berlin, pp 103–125
Mugo S, De Groote H, Bergvinson D, Mulaa M, Songa JM, Gichuki S (2005) Developing Bt maize for resource poor farmers—recent advances in the IRMA project. Afr J Biotechnol 4:1490–1504
Ong’amo GO, Le Ru PB, Campagne P, Branca A, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Silvain J (2012) Genetic diversity and population structure of Busseola segeta Bowden (Lepidotera; Noctuidae) in Guieo-Congolian Rainforest Relic Area, Kenya. Insects 3:1156–1170
Sanghera GS, Husaain W (2012) Heterosis and combining ability estimates usinng line × tester analysis to develop rice hybrids for temperate conditions. Notulae Scintia Biologicae 4(3):131–142
Sasson A (2012) Food security for Africa: an urgent global challenge. Agric Food Secur 1:1–16
Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:71–88
Sharma H, Dhillon M, Pampapathy G, Reddy B (2007) Inheritance of resistance to spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus in sorghum, Sorghum bicolor. Euphytica 156:117–128
Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Am Breed Assoc Rep 4:296–301
Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1942) General vs specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J Am Soc Agron 34:923–932
Tefera T (2012) Post-harvest losses in African maize in the face of increasing food shortage. Food Secur 4:1–11
Udaykumar K, Wali MC, Madalageri D, Malakannavar L, Gangashetty P (2013) Combining ability studies for yield and its related traits in newly derived inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Mol Plant Breed 4:71–76
Wegary D, Vivek B (2013) Association of parental genetic distance with heterosis and specific combining ability in quality protein maize. Euphytica 191:205–216
Acknowledgments
Thanks to The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) for financial support during the research, CIMMYT, Kenya for hosting and for providing me with the germplasm, Director, KALRO for granting me study leave, and for providing the research facilities at Embu, Kakamega, Kiboko and Biotechnology Centre during the research period.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mwimali, M., Derera, J., Tongoona, P. et al. Combining ability for stem borer resistance and heterotic orientation of maize inbred lines using CIMMYT single cross testers under Busseola fusca infestation. Euphytica 208, 323–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1602-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1602-1