Skip to main content
Log in

Response of maize population “Longe5” to two cycles of modified S1 recurrent selection for resistance to maize weevil

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Mostch.) is one of the most damaging storage pests causing significant reductions in grain weight and quality in tropical and subtropical regions. The current study determined the effectiveness of two cycles of modified S1 recurrent selection towards the improvement of weevil resistance in the maize variety “Longe5”. Grain yield and resistance to Turcicum leaf blight, grey leaf spot and rust diseases, which occurred naturally at the time of experimentation, were also evaluated to enhance the overall worth of the maize variety. Selections were made by identifying and self-pollinating the foliar disease resistant and vigorous plants, with potentially big well-placed ears from the base population of the Longe5 (the original cycle i.e., C0), grown at the National Crops Resources Research Institute, Namulonge, in Uganda. Over 540 selfed ears were obtained from the C0 and were screened for maize weevil resistance under controlled conditions in the laboratory, after which 162 weevil resistant genotypes were selected and recombined in an isolated field to generate the C1. The second cycle (C2) was generated from the C1 in a similar procedure, by recombining 190 weevil resistant genotypes. The C0, C1, and C2 were evaluated for grain yield and reaction to foliar diseases at three locations, and the ensuing seed was screened for maize weevil resistance in the laboratory. Significant gains were obtained for maize weevil resistance. There was a reduction in grain weight loss due to maize weevil damage of 65 % in C2 and 15 % in C1. There was a 33 % reduction in the number of weevil progenies emerging in C2 and 19 % in C1 grain. Similar positive trends were realized for grain yield and resistance to foliar diseases in C1 and C2 compared to C0. The results indicate that the modified S1 recurrent selection was effective in improving Longe5 for maize weevil resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abebe F, Tefera T, Mugo S, Beyene Y, Vidal S (2009) Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Afr J Biotechnol 8:5937–5943

    Google Scholar 

  • Badu-Apraku B, Fakorede MAB, Menkir A (2009) Recurrent selection for Striga resistance in early and extra-early maize populations in west Africa. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 9:415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Dari S, Pixley KV, Setimela P (2010) Resistance of early generation maize inbred lines and their hybrids to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky). Crop Sci 50:1310–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groote H, Gunaratna N, Ergano K, Friesen D (2010) Extension and adoption of biofortified crops: quality protein maize in East Africa. Contributed Paper presented at the Joint 3rd African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) and 48th Agricultural Economists Association of South Africa (AEASA) Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, September 19–23, 2010

  • Derera J, Pixley KV, Giga DP, Makanda I (2014) Resistance of maize to the maize weevil: III. Grain weight loss assessment and implications for breeding. J Stored Prod Res 59:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhliwayo T, Pixley K (2003) Divergent selection for resistance to maize weevil in six maize populations. Crop Sci 43:2043–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Lara S, Khairallah M, Vargas M, Bergvinson D (2009) Mapping of QTL associated with maize weevil resistance in tropical maize. Crop Sci 49:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giga DP, Mutumeerwa S, Moya G, Neeley D (1991) Assessment and control of losses caused by insect pests in small farmers’ stores in Zimbabwe. Crop Prot 10:287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, p 468

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaaya AN, Warren HL, Kyamanywa S, Kyamuhangire W (2005) The effect of delayed harvest on moisture content, insect damage, molds and aflatoxin contamination of maize in Mayuge district of Uganda. J Sci Food Agric 85:2595–2599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling BL (1982) Effect of soybean mosaic virus on root volume and dry weight of soybean plants. Crop Sci 22:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Kang MS, Moreno OJ, Pollak LM (1998) Genetic variability in exotic x adapted maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm for resistance to maize weevil. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 114:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnay J (2004) The Ugandan maize industry. Paper presented at the EPAD/IGAD regional conference on “Agricultural Successes in the Greater Horn of Africa”. Nairobi, Kenya

  • Mwololo JK, Mugo S, Okori P, Tefera T, Otim M, Munyiri SW (2012) Sources of resistance to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais in tropical maize. J Agric Sci 4:206–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataky JK, Raid RN, Du Toit LJ, Schueneman TJ (1998) Disease severity and yield of sweet corn hybrids with resistance to northern leaf blight. Plant Dis 82:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS-Institute (2003) SAS system for Windows, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sone J (2001) Mold growth in maize storage as affected by compound factors: different levels of maize weevils, broken corn and foreign materials, and moisture contents. J Asia-Pac Entomol 4:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sserunkuuma D (2003) The adoption and impact of improved maize varieties in Uganda. Green revolution in Asia and its transferability in Africa. Tokyo, Japan

  • Tefera T, Mugo S, Likhayo P (2011a) Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer Prostephanus truncatus. J Agric Res 6:2249–2254

    Google Scholar 

  • Tefera T, Mugo S, Tende R, Likhayo P (2011b) Methods of screening maize for resistance to stem borers and post harvest insect pests. CIMMYT, Nairobi-Kenya, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen K, Waktole S (2013) Differential resistance of maize varieties to maize weevil (Sitophilus seamais Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) under laboratory conditions. J Entomol 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipping PW, Cornelius PL, Legg DE, Poneleit CG, Rodriguez JG (1989) Inheritance of resistance in whole kernel maize to oviposition by the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol Soc Am 82:1466–1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schoonhoven A, Horber E, Wassom CE, Mills RB (1975) Selection for resistance to the maize weevil in kernels of maize. Euphytica 24:639–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek BS, Krivanek AF, Palacios-Rojas N, Twumasi-Afriyie S, Diallo AO (2008) Breeding quality protein maize (QPM): Protocols for developing QPM cultivars. CIMMYT, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivek BS, Odong O, Njuguna J, Imanywoha J, Bigirwa G, Diallo AO (2010) Diallel analysis of grain yield and resistance to seven diseases of 12 African maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Euphytica 172:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widstrom NW, McMillian WW, Redlinger LM, Wiser WJ (1983) Dent corn inbred sources of resistance to the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Econ Entomol 76:31–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly acknowledge the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) for funding the research. The National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) of Uganda, is acknowledged for providing part of the maize germplasm lines and research facilities. CIMMYT is also acknowledged for providing part of the maize germplasm lines used in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Derera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasozi, L.C., Derera, J. & Tongoona, P. Response of maize population “Longe5” to two cycles of modified S1 recurrent selection for resistance to maize weevil. Euphytica 204, 587–598 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1341-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1341-8

Keywords

Navigation