Skip to main content
Log in

A bivariate mixed model approach for the analysis of plant survival data

Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disease resistance is often measured as plant survival, which involves taking multiple counts of plants before and after disease incidence. Often, survival data are analyzed by forming a single derived variable, namely final counts expressed as a percentage of initial counts. In this study we propose a bivariate linear mixed model approach in which the two variables are the initial and final counts. This approach is demonstrated using data from nine blackleg disease nurseries in the 2009 growing season in Australia. Replicated experiments were grown at each nursery with a mixture of commercial Australian canola cultivars and breeding lines (collectively called ‘entries’) being tested. Plant survival was determined by counting all the seedlings at emergence and then recounting the number surviving at maturity in each plot. The counts were considered as two ‘traits’, which were log transformed prior to a bivariate linear mixed model analysis. Each trait had different error variances, spatial components (both local and global) and outliers. The variance of entry effects was non-zero for both traits at all locations. The correlation of entry effects between the traits ranged from 0.218 to 0.935 across locations. Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUPs) of entry effects at both sampling times provided three possible indices for selection: (log) counts at emergence, (log) counts at maturity and the difference between these two which could be exponentiated to provide percentage survival values. Thus the bivariate mixed model approach for the analysis of plant survival data provided a more detailed picture of the impact of disease resistance compared with the univariate analysis of percentage survival data. Additionally the predicted entry effects for survival were more accurate in the bivariate analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Ellis R, Roberts E (1980) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann Bot 45(1):13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R, Hong T, Jackson M (1993) Seed production environment, time of harvest, and the potential longevity of seeds of three cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ann Bot 72(6):583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch-Savage W (1986) A study of the relationship between seedling characters and rate of germination within a seed lot. Ann Appl Biol 108(2):441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitt BDL, Brun H, Barbetti MJ, Rimmer SR (2006) World-wide importance of phoma stem canker (Leptosphaeria maculans and L. biglobosa) on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur J Plant Pathol 114(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F, Benech Arnold R, Sanchez R, Ghersa C (2000) Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crop Res 67(2):123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour A, Cullis B, Verbyla A (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2(3):269–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml-R user guide, Release 3.0. Technical report. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead

  • Khangura RK, Barbetti MJ (2001) Prevalence of blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) on canola (Brassica napus) in Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 41(1):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Barbetti MJ (2007) Soilborne ascospores and pycnidiospores of Leptosphaeria maculans can contribute significantly to blackleg disease epidemiology in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in Western Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 36(5):439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcroft S (2009) Blackleg rating protocols. Technical report. Marcroft Grains Pathology, Horsham

  • Mrode R, Thompson R (2005) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Punithalingam E, Holliday P (1972) Leptosphaeria maculans [descriptions of fungi and bacteria]. IMI Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria (34):Sheet331

  • Qiao C, Basford K, DeLacy I, Cooper M (2000) Evaluation of experimental designs and spatial analyses in wheat breeding trials. TAG Theor Appl Genet 100(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivasithamparam K, Barbetti MJ, Li H (2005) Recurring challenges from a necrotrophic fungal plant pathogen: a case study with Leptosphaeria maculans (causal agent of blackleg disease in Brassicas) in Western Australia. Ann Bot 96(3):363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith H (1957) Interpretation of adjusted treatment means and regressions in analysis of covariance. Biometrics 13(3):282–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Lim P, Cullis B (2006) The design and analysis of multi-phase plant breeding experiments. J Agric Sci 144(05):393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowski MR, Scott ES, Ramsey MD (2006) Survival of Leptosphaeria maculans in soil on residues of Brassica napus in South Australia. Plant Pathol 55(2):200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Meyer K (1986) A review of theoretical aspects in the estimation of breeding values for multi-trait selection. Livest Prod Sci 15(4):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart N (1982) Adjustment in covariance when one factor affects the covariate. Biometrics 38(3):651–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West JS, Kharbanda PD, Barbetti MJ, Fitt BDL (2001) Epidemiology and management of Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) on oilseed rape in Australia, Canada and Europe. Plant Pathol 50(1):10–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Blackleg Committee for the use of the 2009 Australian National Blackleg Resistance Rating data and Steve Marcroft and Chris Lisle for valued help. The authors would also like thank the referees for helpful comments which have greatly improved the manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Grains Research and Development Corporation of Australia (GRDC) in various aspects of this research. Aanandini Ganesalingam acknowledges Bayer CropScience for a PhD scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aanandini Ganesalingam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganesalingam, A., Smith, A.B., Beeck, C.P. et al. A bivariate mixed model approach for the analysis of plant survival data. Euphytica 190, 371–383 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0791-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0791-0

Keywords

Navigation