Robots and reality: a reply to Robert Sparrow
- Russell Blackford
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We commonly identify something seriously defective in a human life that is lived in ignorance of important but unpalatable truths. At the same time, some degree of misapprehension of reality may be necessary for individual health and success. Morally speaking, it is unclear just how insistent we should be about seeking the truth. Robert Sparrow has considered such issues in discussing the manufacture and marketing of robot ‘pets’, such as Sony’s doglike ‘AIBO’ toy and whatever more advanced devices may supersede it. Though it is not his only concern, Sparrow particularly criticizes such robot pets for their illusory appearance of being living things. He fears that some individuals will subconsciously buy into the illusion, and come to sentimentalize interactions that fail to constitute genuine relationships. In replying to Sparrow, I emphasize that this would be continuous with much of the minor sentimentality that we already indulge in from day to day. Although a disposition to seek the truth is morally virtuous, the virtue concerned must allow for at least some categories of exceptions. Despite Sparrow’s concerns about robot pets (and robotics more generally), we should be lenient about familiar, relatively benign, kinds of self-indulgence in forming beliefs about reality. Sentimentality about robot pets seems to fall within these categories. Such limited self-indulgence can co-exist with ordinary honesty and commitment to truth.
- Benson, O., & Stangroom, J. (2006). Why truth matters (pp. 164–165). London and New York: Continuum.
- Blackford, R. (2004). Try the Blue Pill: What’s wrong with life in a simulation? In M. Kapell & W. G. Doty (Eds.), Jacking into the matrix Franchise: Cultural reception and interpretation (pp. 169–182). New York: Continuum.
- Clifford, W. K. (1999) The ethics of belief. First published 1876. In The ethics of belief and other essays (pp. 70–96). Amherst: Prometheus Books.
- Glover, J. (2001). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. First published 1999 (pp. 362–363). London: Pimlico.
- Hofstadter, D. (1995). Preface 4: The ineradicable Eliza effect and its dangers. In D. Hofstadter & The Fluid Analogies Research Group, (Eds.), Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought (pp. 155–168). New York: BasicBooks.
- Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality (pp. 190–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Kant, I. (1948) Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. First published 1785 (H. J. Paton, Trans.). London: Routledge.
- Levy, N. (2004). Self-deception and moral responsibility. Ratio XVII: 294–311.
- Levy, D. (2007). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. New York: HarperCollins.
- Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.
- McMahon, J. L. (2002). Popping a bitter pill: Existential authenticity in The Matrix and Nausea. In W. Irwin (Ed.), The matrix and philosophy: Welcome to the desert of the real (pp. 166–177). Chicago: Open Court.
- Nagel, T. (1979). Death. In Mortal Questions (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia (pp. 42–45). New York: Basic Books.
- Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23–35. CrossRef
- Sparrow, R. (2002). The March of the robot dogs. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 305–318. CrossRef
- Sparrow, R. (2009). Predators or plowshares? Time to consider arms control of robotic weapons. IEEE Technology and Society, 28, 25–29. CrossRef
- Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16, 141–161. CrossRef
- Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. CrossRef
- Robots and reality: a reply to Robert Sparrow
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 14, Issue 1 , pp 41-51
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- ELIZA effect
- Ethics of belief
- Robert Nozick
- Robot pets
- The Matrix
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia