Employment Discrimination Based on Immigration Status: Recent Cases Involving H-1B Visas
- Stan Malos
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The worldwide economic downturn has seen a reversal in previous trends toward offshore staffing and an increase in protectionism toward home country labor. However, employers in the U.S. face potential legal liability if they favor American citizens over authorized foreign guest workers in layoffs, pay decisions, and other such actions. Thus far, employers have succeeded in defending most discrimination claims involving citizenship or immigration status—which often are made by out-of-work plaintiffs unable to afford legal representation—on technical grounds such as faulty pleading, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, filing with the wrong administrative agency, or mischaracterizing immigration claims as ones involving national origin status. These results notwithstanding, a closer reading of the cases suggests that substantive liability may be a matter of growing concern as plaintiffs or their counsel learn to correct such errors. The issues are important to both sides of the employment relationship in today’s global labor market; foreign guest workers will want to better understand their responsibilities and rights, while businesses will want to better manage their legal risks. Because little if any scholarly research has addressed these matters, an exploratory case law review is presented in an effort to identify trends in fact patterns that have generated such issues. Based on the results, practical recommendations are offered for improving the management of U.S. employment relationships that involve foreign guest workers.
- Cunningham-Parmeter, K. (2009). Redefining the rights of undocumented workers. The American University Law Review, 58, 1361–1415.
- Elmore, A. J. (2007). Egalitarianism and exclusion: U.S. guest worker programs and a non-subordination approach to the labor-based admission of nonprofessional foreign nationals. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21, 521–539.
- Foreign labour sparks strikes across Britain. Financial Times, February 1, 2009.
- France: A time of troubles and protest. The Economist, January 24, 2009.
- Globalisation under strain: Homeward bound. The Economist, February 7, 2009.
- H-1B visa holders must find jobs or go home. San Jose Mercury News, February 2, 2009.
- Hahm, J. S. (2000). American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 Balancing economic and labor interests under the new H-1B Visa program. Cornell Law Review, 85, 1673–1701.
- Klaeren, K. (2008). Moving toward a more protective interpretation of national origin discrimination under Title VII. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 77, 349–381.
- Robinson, A. J. (2009). Language, national origin, and employment discrimination: The importance of the EEOC guidelines. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 1513–1539.
- Rodriguez, C. M. (2007). Guest workers and integration: Toward a theory of what immigrants and Americans owe one another. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 219–231.
- White, E. B. (2007). How we treat our guests: Mobilizing employment discrimination protections in a guest worker program. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 28, 269–288.
- Andonissamy v. Hewlett-Packard, 547 F.3d 841 (7th Cir. 2008)
- Biran v. JP Morgan Chase, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17076 (S.D. N.Y. 2002)
- Ficq v. Texas Instruments, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28755 (N.D. Tex. 2004)
- Huang v. Washington Mutual Bank et al., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108020 (W.D. Wash. 2008)
- Karakozova v. University of Pittsburgh, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49027 (W.D. Penn. 2009)
- Liu v. BASF et al., 609 F. Supp. 2d 828 (S.D. Iowa, 2009)
- Ndiaye v. CVS Pharmacy, 547 F. Supp. 2d 807 (S.D. Ohio 2007)
- Olvera-Morales v. Int’l Labor Mgmt. Corp. et al., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3502 (M.D. N.C. 2008)
- Roche v. La Cie, Ltd. et al., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114500 (D. Ore. 2009)
- Shah et al. v. Wilco Systems et al., 126 F. Supp. 2d 641 (S.D. N.Y. 2000)
- Shankar v. ACS-GSI, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22390 (D. C. 2006)
- Sodipo v. Caymas Systems, U.S. Dist. LEXIS62169 (N.D. Ca 2007)
- Tseng v. Florida A&M University et al., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91129 (N.D. Fla. 2009)
- Venkatraman v. REI Systems, 417 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 2004)
- Watson v. Electronic Data Systems et al., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10954 (N.D. Tex. 2004)
- Zhang v. Honeywell Int’l, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90781; 57450 (D. Ariz. 2009; 2010)
- Employment Discrimination Based on Immigration Status: Recent Cases Involving H-1B Visas
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 23-36
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Employment discrimination
- Immigration status
- H-1B visas
- Industry Sectors
- Stan Malos (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. College of Business, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA, 95192–0070, USA