Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of school electrification on learning outcomes: a subnational level analysis of students’ pass rate in English and mathematics in Ghana

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper used district level students’ pass rate in a nationally conducted basic education certification examination to assess the effect of school electrification on learning outcomes. The results show that school electrification in addition to the traditional school-level inputs, such as class size, pupil–teacher ratio, ratio of core textbook to students, and sanitation, help to explain a significant portion of the variation in performance across districts. The analysis further showed that in districts classified as deprived, electrification of schools is a mediating factor for improving pass rate in English and mathematics. In a spatially differentiated developing country like Ghana, this finding is indicative of the need for policy congruence. Ghana has achieved substantial progress in extending electricity to many communities across the country. However, distribution and consumption of electricity is still skewed in favour of urban and affluent communities over rural deprived communities. Students’ performance in the standard national examinations follow similar skewed pattern. The results of this study suggest that electrification of schools could boost students’ performance, and the gain is more significant in deprived districts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source MoE EMIS data (2005–2015)

Fig. 2

Source (GSS 2014)

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This has, however, been attributed to disproportionate distribution of teachers.

References

  • Alazraki, R., & Haselip, J. (2007). Assessing the uptake of small-scale photovoltaic electricity production in Argentina: The PERMER project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacolod, M. P., & Tobias, J. L. (2006). Schools, school quality and achievement growth: Evidence from the Philippines. Economics of Education Review, 25, 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastakoti, B. P. (2006). The electricity-livelihood nexus: Some highlights from the Andhikhola Hydroelectric and Rural Electrification Centre (AHREC). Energy for Sustainable Development, 10(3), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtless, G. (1996). Introduction and summary. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1996). School resources and student outcomes: An overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasso, R., Fernandez, F., & Nopo, H. (2015). Electrification and educational outcomes in rural Peru. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8928, March 2015.

  • Glewwe, P., Hanushek, E., Humpage, S., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper N. 17554, October 2011.

  • Godwin, P. (2013). The dark side of education, October 8, 2013. http://www.one.org/us/2013/10/08/the-dark-side-of-education/. Accessed \(14{{\rm th}}\) Aug 2016.

  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2014). Poverty profile in Ghana—2005–2013.

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanagawa, M., & Nakata, T. (2008). Assessment of access to electricity and the socioeconomic impacts in rural areas of developing countries. Energy Policy, 36(6), 2016–2029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirubi, C., Jacobson, A., Kammen, D., & Mills, A. (2009). Community-based electric micro-grids can contribute to rural development: Evidence from Kenya. World Development, 37(7), 1208–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., & Holla, A. (2009). Improving education in the developing world: What have we learned from randomized evaluations? Annual Review of Economics, 1, 513–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2004). Results from Ghanaian junior high 2 students’ participation in TIMSS -2007 in mathematics and science. Accra.

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). Textbook development and distribution policy for pre-tertiary education. Accra: CRDD.

  • Ministry of Education. (2008). Results from Ghanaian junior high 2 students’ participation in TIMSS -2007 in mathematics and science. Accra.

  • Ministry of Education. (2013). Education sector performance report. Accra.

  • Ministry of Energy (2010). National Energy Policy. Republic of Ghana, Accra.

  • Ministry of Energy and Petroleum. (2014). Medium term expenditure framework for 2014–2016: Programme based budget estimates. Accra.

  • Pritchett, L., & Filmer, D. (1999). What education production functions really show: A positive theory of education expenditure. Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. (2014). Electricity and education: The benefits, barriers, and recommendations for achieving the electrification of primary and secondary schools. Geneva: UNDESA, UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Ryan, S. E. (2016). The geography of energy and education: Leaders, laggards, and lessons for achieving primary and secondary school electrification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 107–123.

  • World Bank & International Energy Agency. (2013). Sustainable energy for all: Global tracking framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clement Adamba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adamba, C. Effect of school electrification on learning outcomes: a subnational level analysis of students’ pass rate in English and mathematics in Ghana. Educ Res Policy Prac 17, 15–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-017-9215-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-017-9215-1

Keywords

Navigation