Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns and trends in achievement gaps in Malaysian Secondary Schools (1999–2011): gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational inequality is a highly debated yet empirically understudied topic in Malaysia. This paper examines the patterns and trends of academic achievement gaps by student social groups in Malaysia, drawing upon nationally representative data for the most recent four cohorts (1999, 2003, 2007, and 2011) of eighth-grade Malaysian students from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Results show that while the achievement gaps by gender (female vs. male) and ethnicity (Malay vs. non-Malay) existed at various time points and have changed over time, the magnitudes of change were small. Most alarmingly, the achievement gaps both in math and in science between students from high and low socioeconomic families have rapidly widened and became more prominent than gender and ethnicity gaps in recent years. If this trend continues, it will have dire consequences for economic equality and social stability in the society. To reduce educational achievement gaps, policymakers and educators should play a more active role in supporting academically disadvantaged students, especially those who are from underprivileged backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some other dimensions for identifying achievement gaps are geographical (e.g., urbanicity, regions) or political (e.g., immigration status).

  2. These studies generally concluded that in terms of educational attainment in secondary and post-secondary schools, a Malay advantage trend emerged when comparing birth cohorts across multiple decades pre- and post-independence of Malaysia (Lillard and Willis 1994; Pong 1993, 1995). Furthermore, Pong (1993) found that within Malay group the gender and socioeconomic gaps in educational attainment closed but within non-Malay group they persisted and even widened in some cases.

  3. Two additional proxies of family socioeconomic status, number of books at home and home possessions, were used for the same analysis in this paper. The findings yield similar patterns to the results using parental education as a proxy of socioeconomic status reported in this paper.

  4. According to the report Population Distribution and Basic Demographic Characteristics 2010 (Census 2010) released by the Malaysian Department of Statistics (2014), Malay group accounts for about 58 % of teenagers aged 10–14 in the country. The calculations of Malay students in our sample based on the measure of “frequency of use of language of test at home” yield slightly higher percentages at the similar age, but the numbers are quite close to those reported in the Census 2010. It gives us more confidence that our ethnicity identification strategy is reasonable.

References

  • Bedard, K., & Ferrall, C. (2003). Wage and test score dispersion: Some international evidence. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F., & Kahn, L. (2005). Do cognitive test scores explain higher US wage inequality? Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 184–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Luijkx, R. (2007). Social mobility and education: A comparative analysis of period and cohort trends in Britain and Germany. In S. Scherer, R. Pollak, G. Otte, & M. Gangl (Eds.), From origin to destination: Trends and mechanisms in social stratification research (pp. 102–124). New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. K. (2007). Making ethnic citizens: The politics and practice of education in Malaysia. International Journal of Development, 27(3), 318–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, A. K. (2014, aPRIL). Changes in socioeconomic achievement gaps in international comparison, 1964–2012. Paper presented at the 2014 American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Clark, J. L. (Ed.). (2014). Closing the achievement gap from an international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1968). The concept of equality of educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, F., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, G. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2010). Understanding health differences by education. Journal of Health Economics, 29(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. G., & Gignoux, J. (2014). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity. World Bank Economic Review, 28(2), 210–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, D. (2004). Understanding the Black–White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2007). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40-year retrospective. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, & M. Duru-Bellat (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality: Theory and policy (pp. 23–47). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2010). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillygus, D. S. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political behavior. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. (1988). More universalism, less structural mobility: The American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1358–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, N. A. (2009). Understanding the gap in mathematics achievement of Malaysian students. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, N. A., & Awang, H. (2007). Differentials in mathematics achievement among eighth-grade students in Malaysia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, N. A., & Awang, H. (2009). Mathematics achievement among Malaysian students: What they can learn from Singapore. International Education Studies, 2(1), 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, N. A., & Awang, H. (2012). Student factors and mathematics achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenayathulla, H. B. (2013). Household expenditures on private tutoring emerging evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(4), 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R., & Katz, R. (1983). Overcoming ethnic inequalities: Lessons from Malaysia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(3), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. A., & Willis, R. J. (1994). Intergenerational educational mobility: Effects of family and state in Malaysia. Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 1126–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach, J., & Bakker, M. (Eds.). (2002). Reducing inequalities in health: A European perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madeira, R. A., & Rangel, M. A. (2014). Racial achievement gaps in another America: Discussing schooling outcomes and affirmative action in Brazil. In J. V. Clark (Ed.), Closing the achievement gap from an international perspective (pp. 127–160). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, K., & Waldfogel, J. (Eds.). (2008). Steady gains and stalled progress: Inequality and the Black–White test score Gap. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H. (1848). Horace Mann on education and national welfare. Twelfth Annual Report of Horace Mann as Secretary of Massachusetts State Board of Education. Retrieved from http://www.tncrimlaw.com/civil_bible/horace_mann.htm.

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadpour, E. (2012). A multilevel study on trends in Malaysian secondary school students’ science achievement and associated school and student predictors. Science Education, 96(6), 1013–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. T., Lay, Y. F., Areepattamannil, S., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2012). Relationship between affect and achievement in science and mathematics in Malaysia and Singapore. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pong, S. L. (1993). Preferential policies and secondary school attainment in peninsular Malaysia. Sociology of Education, 66(4), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pong, S. L. (1995). Access to education in Peninsular Malaysia: Ethnicity, social class, and gender. Compare, 25(3), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children (pp. 91–115). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw, G. K. (2015). Family and school factors relating to academic achievement gaps in Malaysia. In S. H. Ngu (Ed.), Essays in 2014 Malaysia Chinese Education Conference: Challenges and Reforms (pp. 241–263). Malaysia: Merdeka University Berhad, LLG Cultural Development Centre, Centre for Malaysian Chinese Studies.

  • Singh, J. S., & Mukherjee, H. (1993). Education and national integration in Malaysia: Stocktaking after thirty years of independence. International Journal of Educational Development, 13(2), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, K. W. (1984). Education as a vehicle for reducing economic inequality. In S. H. Ali (Ed.), Ethnicity, class and development: Malaysia (pp. 224–264). Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Sains Sosial Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2011). PISA 2009 Plus results : Performance of 15-year-olds in reading, mathematics and science for 10 additional participants. Melbourne: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guan Kung Saw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saw, G.K. Patterns and trends in achievement gaps in Malaysian Secondary Schools (1999–2011): gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educ Res Policy Prac 15, 41–54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9175-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9175-2

Keywords

Navigation